A Case of Hyperammonemia Associated with High Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Activity
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
Case Reports in Oncological Medicine
Volume 2016, Article ID 7510901, 4 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7510901
Case Report
A Case of Hyperammonemia Associated with High
Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Activity
Keiki Nagaharu,1 Kenji Ikemura,2 Yoshiki Yamashita,3 Hiroyasu Oda,3 Mikiya Ishihara,3
Yumiko Sugawara,3 Satoshi Tamaru,3 Toshiro Mizuno,3 and Naoyuki Katayama3
1
Department of Hematology and Oncology, Suzuka General Hospital, Yamanohana, Yasuzuka, Suzuka, Mie Prefecture 1275-53, Japan
Department of Pharmacy, Mie University Hospital, Edobashi 2-174, Tsu, Mie Prefecture 514-8507, Japan
3
Department of Hematology and Oncology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Edobashi 2-174, Tsu,
Mie Prefecture 514-8507, Japan
2
Correspondence should be addressed to Keiki Nagaharu;
Received 9 October 2015; Accepted 20 December 2015
Academic Editor: Raffaele Palmirotta
Copyright © 2016 Keiki Nagaharu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License,
which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Over the past decades, 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) has been widely used to treat several types of carcinoma, including esophageal
squamous cell carcinoma. In addition to its common side effects, including diarrhea, mucositis, neutropenia, and anemia, 5FU treatment has also been reported to cause hyperammonemia. However, the exact mechanism responsible for 5-FU-induced
hyperammonemia remains unknown. We encountered an esophageal carcinoma patient who developed hyperammonemia when
receiving 5-FU-containing chemotherapy but did not exhibit any of the other common adverse effects of 5-FU treatment. At
the onset of hyperammonemia, laboratory tests revealed high dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) activity and rapid 5-FU
clearance. Our findings suggested that 5-FU hypermetabolism may be one of the key mechanisms responsible for hyperammonemia
during 5-FU treatment.
1. Introduction
2. Case Report
In 1957, Heidelberger et al. reported the use of 5-FU as
a new antitumoral drug [1], and at present, 5-FU is one
of the most commonly used anticancer drugs around the
world. A combination of cisplatin and 5-FU is often used
for first-line chemotherapy in unresectable cases of advanced
esophageal carcinoma. As is the case for other anticancer
drugs, the most common side effects of 5-FU, such as
diarrhea, mucositis, neutropenia, and anemia, are due to its
effects on the bone marrow and gastrointestinal epithelium.
These common adverse effects are observed in more than
half of the patients treated with 5-FU-containing regimens
[2]. On the other hand, the prevalence of 5-FU-induced
hyperammonemia has been reported to range within 5.7%–
7.0% [3–5]. The exact mechanism responsible for 5-FUinduced hyperammonemia remains unknown. Herein, we
report a patient who developed recurrent hyperammonemia.
A 60-year-old man presented with a 1-month history of
progressively worsening discomfort during swallowing. His
medical history included treated gastric cancer (5 years
earlier) and emphysema. The patient reported that he had
smoked approximately 20 cigarettes per day since the age
of 20. Laboratory tests did not detect hepatic disorders or
renal problems. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed
an ulcerative lesion with elevated distinct borders in the
lower esophagus, and endoscopic ultrasound detected serosal
invasion. The lesion was diagnosed as a squamous cell
carcinoma from a biopsy. A positron emission tomography
(PET) examination confirmed lung metastasis. As a result,
the patient was clinically staged as cT3N1M1 and was treated
with 5-FU and cisplatin. However, his obstructive swallowing problems continued to worsen. We next administered
concurrent radiotherapy as a palliative treatment. The treatment regimen (FP regimen) consisted of 5-FU at a dose of
2
Case Reports in Oncological Medicine
Table 1: Laboratory findings.
[Peripheral blood]
WBC
RBC
Hb
Ht
MCV
Plt
[Coagulation test]
APTT
PT
D-dimer
[Biochemistry]
TP
Alb
AST
ALT
LDH
𝛾-GTP
T-Bil
Glu
BUN
Cre
Na
K
Cl
CRP
NH3
5-FU concentration
Day of onset
The following day
[Normal range]
8080/𝜇L
382 × 104 /𝜇L
15.3 g/dL
33.3%
87.2 fL
26.3 × 104 /𝜇L
5180/𝜇L
414 × 104 /𝜇L
12.9 g/dL
37.0%
89.4 fL
25.6 × 104 /𝜇L
3500–9000/𝜇L
376–500 × 104 /𝜇L
11.3–15.2 g/dL
33.4–44.9%
82.7–101 fL
13.0–36.9 × 104 /𝜇L
31.0 sec
14.2 sec
0.66 𝜇g/mL
6.2 g/dL
3.4 g/dL
20 IU/L
25 IU/L
182 IU/L
0.6 mg/dL
101 mg/dL
34 mg/dL
0.95 mg/dL
129 mEq/L
2.6 mEq/L
93 mEq/L
0.47 mg/dL
131 𝜇g/dL
13 ng/mL
25.0–45.0 sec
13.5–15.0 sec
<0.50 𝜇g/mL
5.6 g/dL
3.4 g/dL
20 IU/L
23 IU/L
155 IU/L
50 IU/L
0.60 mg/dL
6.5–8.5 g/dL
4.1–5.3 g/dL
10–35 IU/L
10–35 IU/L
110–225 IU/L
8–60 IU/L
0.2–1.3 mg/dL
80–120 mg/dL
9.6–22.0 mg/dL
<1.20 mg/dL
138–145 mEq/L
3.4–4.7 mEq/L
99–108 mEq/L
<0.30 mg/dL
<18 𝜇g/dL
600 ng/mL (steady state)
31 mg/dL
1.09 mg/dL
136 mEq/L
3.1 mEq/L
97 mEq/L
0.44 mg/dL
44 𝜇g/dL
<10 ng/mL
Laboratory findings revealed hyperammonemia and mild hyponatremia. Serum concentration of 5-FU was low.
800 mg/m2 on days 1–5 and cisplatin at a dose of 80 mg/m2
on day 1 and was repeated every 28 days. The patient did
not exhibit specific adverse effects during the first course
of treatment. After the completion of that, a second course
of the same regimen was started. However, the patient fell
unconscious 72 hours after the initiation of treatment.
On physical examination, he was unconscious (Glasgow
Coma Scale: E1V3M5) and afebrile and had a pulse rate of
69 bpm and a blood pressure of 111/61 mmHg. There were no
signs of mucositis. A neurological examination did not detect
paralysis or abnormal reflexes. The patient’s laboratory data
revealed hyperammonemia, mild hyponatremia, and a high
blood urea nitrogen (BUN) level. Other findings are shown
in Table 1. Radiological assessments including computed
tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
scans of the patient’s head did not detect any apparent cause
of the patient’s condition. On the following day, his condition
normalized with only normal saline hydration, and he did not
exhibit sequelae. We subsequently diagnosed the patient with
5-FU-related hyperammonemia.
Table 2: Urinary analysis of dihydrouracil and uracil.
Patient’s value
Normal range [6]
Dihydrouracil
5.325 𝜇g/mL
1.7–13.1 𝜇g/mL
Uracil
0.495 𝜇g/mL
4–30 𝜇g/mL
Ratio
10.75
0.3–0.77
Urinary DHU/U was much higher than normal. These findings supported
the high activity of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase.
At the onset of hyperammonemia, the patient’s serum
5-FU concentration during the unconscious state was significantly lower (13 ng/mL) than the normal range (500–
600 ng/mL). In 5-FU metabolism, approximately 80% of
infused 5-FU is degraded by DPD, the initial and ratelimiting enzyme in the catabolism of pyrimidine bases, and
this process produces ammonia as the end product. Due
to the rapid clearance of 5-FU, (...truncated)