Back to basics
RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS
© 2017 Nature America, Inc., part of Springer Nature. All rights reserved.
Back to basics
Neuroscience looks to Hydra for connections between the brain and behavior
The human brain is complicated. Billions
of neurons are linked by trillions of connections, responsible for everything from
memories to movement. Understanding
those connections is no easy task, driving
the search for evolutionarily conserved
features from simpler brains that are easier
to manipulate. Immense knowledge has
been gained from working with species
like mice and zebrafish, and invertebrates
like Drosophila and C. elegans are proving
invaluable in our understanding of how the
nervous system works. But even an organism as seemingly simple as a fly or a worm
has its neurological complexities. New
research goes back—all the way back—to
one of the very simplest animals to make a
complete map of brain activity (Curr. Biol.
27, 1–13; 2017).
Following a suggestion from Sydney
Brenner, Rafael Yuste’s lab at Columbia
University adopted the cnidarian Hydra
vulgaris as a model of the nervous system.
“You cannot go more basic than cnidarians
because the animals below them don’t have
neurons,” Yuste says, explaining that these
animals possess the simplest “brains” one
can study. Relatives of jellyfish and coral,
Hydra are freshwater polyps, named for the
tentacles resembling the mythical Greek
beast. Rather than a formal brain and nervous system, Hydra instead have a “nerve
net,” a fairly evenly spaced assemblage of
neurons that allows them to expand and
contract, hunt prey and reproduce and, in
a feat of acrobatics, somersault head-overfoot to move about. They are easy to maintain in the lab—the immortal animals are
quite hardy—but have only recently become
accessible for neuroscience research.
Two developments were needed, explains
lead author Christophe Dupré. The first
was the ability to create a transgenic Hydra
LabAnimal
a
Neuronal groups
Networks
RP1
RP2
CB
CB’
Others
200 μm
The different neuronal groups in Hydra. Image
adapted from Curr. Biol. 27, 1–13; 2017.
that expresses different fluorescent markers. That happened about a decade ago, he
says. They also needed an improved, higher
performance calcium indicator that could
capture activity at individual neurons. That
came just a few years ago with the development of molecules such as GCaMP6s.
Dupré and Yuste created a transgenic
Hydra expressing the new indicator and,
with slight modifications to their microscopy techniques, recorded neural activity
simultaneously across the entire body of
the millimeter long animals.
What they found were four distinct—and
non-overlapping—circuits, each linked to
a specific movement. One circuit elongates the animal and two others contract
it radially and longitudinally, while the
fourth, present below the tentacles, creates
a “nodding” motion. The results suggest
an answer to long-standing question about
neural circuit connectivity. “Out of a tapestry of neurons that appear to be all the same
and appear to be all connected, somehow
evolution has been able to carve out these
specific subcircuits, each of them doing a
particular behavior,” says Yuste.
Dupré and Yuste’s work in Hydra is the
first of many brain activity maps in the
works as part of the Brain Activity Map
project, an idea Yuste helped develop that
was rebranded and expanded by President
Obama as the BRAIN Initiative in 2013.
The 15-year BRAIN Initiative is currently
funding over 300 labs in the US and abroad
to develop new neuroscience methods and
techniques with the ultimate goal of imaging every spike from every neuron in the
nervous system, Yuste explains. Though
only a few years in, researchers involved
with the Initiative are advancing imaging
methods and techniques to stimulate and
manipulate neuron activity; they are also
improving the mathematics and statistics
needed to analyze the immense amounts
of data being produced and are considering how to apply all these developments to
human brains. Activity maps in more traditional models, like zebrafish and Drosophila,
are also advancing as the methods needed to
capture neuronal activity in more complex
nervous systems continue to improve.
Dupré and Yuste will continue their work
in Hydra, looking next at how the different
circuits coordinate more complex behavior
like feeding and somersaulting. The dream
is “to completely decode or reverse-engineer
its brain,” says Yuste, and be able to make
predictions about the animals’ movements.
From there, it will be a question of how
those observations translate up through the
evolutionary tree. Yuste expects to find similarities, and sees great potential in studying organisms he thinks have been underexploited (Trends Neurosci. 40, 92–105;
2017). Genome sequencing of cnidarians
has revealed more genes than expected—
Hydra contains over 20,000, many of which
appear to be conserved in other lineages.
“The game that evolution is playing is not
a game of inventing new molecules or new
genes, but combining these building blocks
into more complicated organisms,” Yuste
thinks. “That makes it really important to
study these basal metazoan animals.”
Ellen P. Neff
Volume 46, No. 6 | JUNE 2017 221
(...truncated)