Amphetamine and Methamphetamine Increase NMDAR-GluN2B Synaptic Currents in Midbrain Dopamine Neurons
Neuropsychopharmacology (2017) 42, 1539–1547
© 2017 American College of Neuropsychopharmacology. All rights reserved 0893-133X/17
www.neuropsychopharmacology.org
Amphetamine and Methamphetamine Increase
NMDAR-GluN2B Synaptic Currents in Midbrain
Dopamine Neurons
Ming-Hua Li1, Suzanne M Underhill2, Cheryl Reed3, Tamara J Phillips3,4, Susan G Amara2 and
Susan L Ingram*,1
1
Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA; 2National Institute of Mental Health, National
Institutes of Health, Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Neurobiology, Bethesda, MD, USA; 3Department of Behavioral Neuroscience, Oregon
Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA; 4VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA
The psychostimulants amphetamine (AMPH) and methamphetamine (MA) are widely abused illicit drugs. Here we show that both
psychostimulants acutely increase NMDA receptor (NMDAR)-mediated synaptic currents and decrease AMPA receptor (AMPAR)/
NMDAR ratios in midbrain dopamine neurons. The potentiation depends on the transport of AMPH into the cell by the dopamine
transporter. NMDAR-GluN2B receptor inhibitors, ifenprodil, RO 25-6981, and RO 04-5595, inhibit the potentiation without affecting
basal-evoked NMDA currents, indicating that NMDAR-GluN2B receptors are activated by AMPH. A selective peptide inhibitor of AMPHdependent trafficking of the neuronal excitatory amino acid transporter 3 (EAAT3) blocks potentiation, suggesting that EAAT3
internalization increases extracellular glutamate concentrations and activates GluN2B-containing NMDARs. Experiments with the usedependent NMDAR blocker, MK-801, indicate that potentiated NMDARs reside on the plasma membrane and are not inserted de novo. In
behavioral studies, GluN2B inhibitors reduce MA-mediated locomotor activity, without affecting basal activity. These results reveal an
important interaction between dopamine and glutamatergic signaling in midbrain dopamine neurons in response to acute administration of
psychostimulants.
Neuropsychopharmacology (2017) 42, 1539–1547; doi:10.1038/npp.2016.278; published online 18 January 2017
INTRODUCTION
Repeated use of the psychostimulants amphetamine (AMPH)
and methamphetamine (MA) leads to long-term adaptations
in the central nervous system, including locomotor sensitization (Karler et al, 1989; Kelly et al, 2008) that can be observed
following a single injection of AMPH (Vanderschuren et al,
1999). The cellular mechanisms underlying sensitization are
not well understood, but AMPH or MA administration is
associated with increased dopamine and glutamate release in
midbrain areas (Lominac et al, 2012; Vanderschuren et al,
1999; Wolf et al, 2000; Zhang et al, 2001), suggesting an
intricate interplay between these two neurotransmitter
systems in midbrain circuits. Indeed, locomotor sensitization
can be blocked with NMDA receptor (NMDAR) antagonists
(Karler et al, 1989; Yap et al, 2005), implying that NMDARs
have an important role in synaptic plasticity induced by
psychostimulants.
*Correspondence: Dr SL Ingram, Department of Neurological Surgery,
Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU), 3181 SW Sam Jackson
Park Road, Portland, OR 97239, USA, Tel: 503 494 1220, Fax: 503 494
2664, E-mail:
Received 29 August 2016; revised 29 November 2016; accepted 11
December 2016; accepted article preview online 15 December 2016
AMPH and MA have multiple actions on dopamine neurons;
they are substrates for the dopamine transporter (DAT) and
vesicular monoamine transporter (Sulzer, 2011) and induce
trafficking of DAT (Johnson et al, 2005; Kahlig et al, 2006;
Saunders et al, 2000). We recently showed that AMPH also
induces trafficking of the neuronal excitatory amino acid
transporter 3 (EAAT3) from the plasma membrane of
dopamine neurons (Underhill et al, 2014). This family of
glutamate transporters includes five isoforms that regulate
the temporal and spatial influence of glutamate at the synapse
and protect neurons from glutamate excitotoxicity. In general,
EAAT isoforms 1 and 2 are found predominantly in
astrocytes, EAAT3 in neurons, EAAT4 in cerebellar Purkinje
cells, and EAAT5 expression is restricted to the retina (Danbolt,
2001). EAAT3 trafficking increased NMDAR synaptic currents
in mouse dopamine neurons localized to both the substantia
nigra pars compacta (SNc) and ventral tegmental area
(Underhill et al, 2014). Here, we further explore the effects of
AMPH and MA on glutamatergic synaptic currents in SNc
dopamine neurons. We show that AMPH superfusion
potentiates NMDAR-mediated synaptic currents and that the
potentiation is dependent on the activation of NMDARs
containing GluN2B subunits. Further, activation of NMDARGluN2B subunits contributes to locomotor stimulation induced
by acute administration of MA.
AMPH increases NMDAR-GluN2B EPSCs
M-H Li et al
1540
Figure 1 Amphetamine (AMPH) increases NMDA receptor (NMDAR) excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) in substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc)
dopamine neurons. (a) Isolated NMDAR responses were significantly potentiated by AMPH (n = 14), but AMPA receptor (AMPAR) EPSCs were unaffected
(n = 8). (b) To determine AMPAR/NMDAR ratios, evoked AMPAR and NMDAR EPSC amplitudes were measured at +40 mV at the peak and 40 ms later,
respectively. AMPAR/NMDAR ratios were significantly decreased after superfusion of AMPH (10 μM) for 20 min (n = 7). (c) The potentiation by AMPH was
observed in cells expressing a hyperpolarization-activated current (Ih). (d) No potentiation occurred in Ih negative SNc neurons. *po0.05.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Approvals
All procedures were performed in strict accordance with the
Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals as adopted
and promulgated by the National Institutes of Health and
approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use
Committees of Oregon Health & Science University and
the VA Portland Health Care System.
In Vitro Studies
Rats. Postnatal days 25–45 male Sprague–Dawley rats
were used for all electrophysiology experiments. Midbrain
horizontal slices were prepared and the electrophysiological
and biochemical experiments performed as described previously (Underhill et al, 2014). Detailed methods and
chemicals used are described in Supplementary Materials
and Methods.
Data analysis. All data are reported as mean ± SEM.
Student’s t-test and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were
used where appropriate. The criterion for significance was
set at po0.05.
Behavioral Study
Adult (73–118 days old) male and female MA low drinking
mice from the MA Abuse Research Center Animal Core
within the VA Portland Health Care System animal facility
were used for this study. Locomotor activity testing was
performed on 3 consecutive days to allow for habituation to
Neuropsychopharmacology
handling and injection (Day 1), collection of baseline activity
data (Day 2), and collection of data after drug treatment
(Day 3). RO 04-5595 (RO) HCl (Abcam, Cambridge, MA)
and (+)MA HCl (Sigma, St Loui (...truncated)