Press Coverage of Internal Divisions Over Reform Judaism, 1905-1920: A Classic Tale of the American Progressive Movement

Historical Perspectives: Santa Clara University Undergraduate Journal of History, Series II, Dec 2017

By Katherine Porter, Published on 02/02/18

Press Coverage of Internal Divisions Over Reform Judaism, 1905-1920: A Classic Tale of the American Progressive Movement

Historical Perspectives: Santa Clara University Undergraduate Journal of History, Series II Volume 22 Article 11 2017 Press Coverage of Internal Divisions Over Reform Judaism, 1905-1920: A Classic Tale of the American Progressive Movement Katherine Porter Santa Clara Univeristy, Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.scu.edu/historical-perspectives Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Porter, Katherine (2017) "Press Coverage of Internal Divisions Over Reform Judaism, 1905-1920: A Classic Tale of the American Progressive Movement," Historical Perspectives: Santa Clara University Undergraduate Journal of History, Series II: Vol. 22 , Article 11. Available at: https://scholarcommons.scu.edu/historical-perspectives/vol22/iss1/11 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Historical Perspectives: Santa Clara University Undergraduate Journal of History, Series II by an authorized editor of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact . Porter: Press Coverage of Internal Divisions Over Reform Judaism, 1905-1920 Press Coverage of Internal Divisions Over Reform Judaism, 19051920: A Classic Tale of the American Progressive Movement Katherine Porter In 2017, anti-Semitism is alive and well, as Jewish cemeteries are vandalized and Jewish community centers around the country are terrorized by an increasing number of bomb threats.1 Over the course of history, Jews have been persecuted and discriminated against as “others” socially, economically, and politically. There is a distinct and enduring identity that comes with being Jewish, however in the last few centuries, Jews around the world have made a clear effort to prove that they are as much a citizen of their home country as they are Jewish, demonstrating their civic pride and inclusivity. Although modern, racial anti-Semitism was a generally new idea during the Progressive Era, Jews worldwide had already experienced different types of discrimination and knew of its damaging effects. Many Jews sought to prove their ability to adapt to a new society by showing the flexibility of their faith. In the new, quickly changing society, every aspect of life needed to be reconsidered and adjusted to maximize acculturation. Reformers sought a variety of ways to modify Judaism so that it fit better within American society and its ideals. Some modifications were simple, such as shortening a prayer, while others were much more complicated and controversial, such as dismantling kosher dietary laws. These efforts generated much debate among American Jews and rabbinical leaders, often making headlines. Dana Evan Kaplan, a Reform rabbi, has written extensively about Reform Judaism, focusing on the need for a central theological belief in order to sustain the reform movement. Another prominent scholar is Michael A. Meyer, who has dedicated his life’s work to Reform Judaism, writing Response to Modernity: A History of the Reform Movement in Judaism, a comprehensive history demonstrating Judaism’s growth and detailing triumphs and failures within the context of the greater world. This paper focuses specifically on the disunity within American Reform Judaism during the Progressive Era through the lens of popular press coverage. Analysis of contemporary accounts in the New York Times, America's newspaper of record, on 1 Eric Levenson and Anne Claire Stapleton, "Fear Grows in Jewish Community after 100 Bomb Threats at Jewish Centers," CNN, 13 Mar. 2017. Historical Perspectives, Series II, Volume XXII, 2017 Published by Scholar Commons, 2017 1 Historical Perspectives: Santa Clara University Undergraduate Journal of History, Series II, Vol. 22 [2017], Art. 11 the internal divisions over Reform Judaism reveals both the pervasiveness and the limits of progressive reform. Reform Judaism, while strongly associated with the United States, actually has its origins in Europe. Many countries in Western and Central Europe during the late eighteenth century saw the emancipation of Jews. 2 With this new freedom, Reform Judaism originated as a German movement. Jews began focusing on establishing a national identity, as opposed to a religious one, throughout the next century. Jews saw some success as they attempted to integrate into society, although this came to an end by the early twentieth century when racial antiSemitism took a strong hold across Europe.3 Reform Judaism made its way to America before this shift in Europe, and the first reform attempt was made in 1824 in Charleston, South Carolina.4 “Reform Judaism proved especially popular in the United States after the middle of the nineteenth century, and over 90 percent of Jewish congregations were Reformed by 1880.”5 Without the same religious persecution and age-old social structures that prevailed throughout Europe, America was the perfect place to take an untraditional stance on religion.6 In 1885, Jews composed the Pittsburgh Platform. This document outlined the eight principles of Reform Judaism, which stressed universalism and optimism. 7 While other platforms would take shape up until the present day, this one served as the foundation for American Reform Judaism during the Progressive Era. With new reforms come disagreements and different perspectives, and Reform Judaism was no exception. Supporters of Reform Judaism believed in the fluidity of their faith and the necessity of progressive change to match the progressive sentiment taking place within the United States. As society moved forward and evolved, so must religion, otherwise it would get left behind. Daniel P. Hays, a prominent figure among 2 Ronnie Landau, The Nazi Holocaust (Chicago: Ivan R. Dee, 1994), 50. Ibid., 51. 4 Dana Evan Kaplan, American Reform Judaism (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2003), 9. 5 William A. Link and Susannah J. Link, eds., The Gilded Age and Progressive Era: A Documentary Reader (New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012), 169. 6 Michael A. Meyer, Response to Modernity: A History of the Reform Movement in Judaism (New York: Oxford University Press, 1988), 226. 7 “Reform Judaism: History & Overview,” Jewish Virtual Library, <http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/history-and-overview-of-reform-judaism>. 3 73 https://scholarcommons.scu.edu/historical-perspectives/vol22/iss1/11 2 Porter: Press Coverage of Internal Divisions Over Reform Judaism, 1905-1920 Reform Judaism organizations in New York, noted, “As Jews we must revere and respect the ancient history of our race, but feel that Judaism, our religion, must be progressive, a religion that assists us in our daily life, not merely a religion of the synagogue, but of the home.” 8 It was highly controversial for a religion so entrenched in tradition and history to make any changes to practices and values. However, reformers saw that the current customs within Judaism were not working for everyone. Jews either stood out too m (...truncated)


This is a preview of a remote PDF: https://scholarcommons.scu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1156&context=historical-perspectives
Article home page: https://scholarcommons.scu.edu/historical-perspectives/vol22/iss1/11

Katherine Porter. Press Coverage of Internal Divisions Over Reform Judaism, 1905-1920: A Classic Tale of the American Progressive Movement, Historical Perspectives: Santa Clara University Undergraduate Journal of History, Series II, 2017, Volume 22, Issue 1,