THE ROLE OF REGIONAL ORGANIZATIONS IN HUMANITARIAN INTERVENTION: THE CASE OF LIBERIA PEACEBUILDING OPERATION AND ECOWAS INTERVENTION

SOSYAL VE BEŞERİ BİLİMLER ARAŞTIRMALARI DERGİSİ JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES RESEARCHES Güz/Autumn 2015-Sayı/Issue 35 The Role of Regional Organizations in Humanitarian Intervention: The Case of Liberia Peacebuilding Operation and ECOWAS Intervention Burak Toygar HALİSTOPRAK İİBF Fakültesi, Uluslararası İlişkiler Bölümü Abstract Humanitarian intervention has been a controversial but also one of the most frequently used instruments of world politics. The literature on the subject is abundant of studies both written in a critical tone and also aiming at proposing a better framework for humanitarian intervention. On that sense, the identity of the intervening body is an important part of the debates on the humanitarian intervention. According to a line of argument in the literature, the interventions in which regional international organizations play significant roles give much more effective results for consolidating a long-lasting peace and security compared to the interventions conducted solely by broader international bodies. Addressing to this debate, this article focuses on the case of intervention to Liberian civil war and the role played by ECOWAS, a regional international organization established by West African countries, in this operation. Throughout the article, it is suggested that ECOWAS's regional identity facilitated the acceptance of the operation by both the peoples and the political figures in the country. With this aspect, the article underlines that the case of Liberia presents many lessons for international community in order to practice more effective and fruitful interventions. Keywords: Humanitarian intervention, peacebuilding, Liberia, regional organizations, international organizations, ECOWAS, Africa, local ownership. İnsani Müdahalede Bölgesel Kurumların Rolü: Liberya Barış inşaası Operasyonu Örneği ve ECOWAS Müdahalesi Öz İnsani müdahale dünya politikasının hem en tartışmalı hem de en sıklıkla kullanılan araçlarında biridir. Konu üzerinde gelişmiş olan yazında insani müdahaleye eleştirel yaklaşan çalışmaların yanısıra, nasıl daha iyi müdahale çerçeveleri oluşturulabileceğine odaklanan çalışmalar da bulunmaktadır. Bu anlamda, müdahale eden kurumların kimliği tartışmalarda önemli bir yer 1 SOSYAL VE BEŞERİ BİLİMLER ARAŞTIRMALARI DERGİSİ JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES RESEARCHES Güz/Autumn 2015-Sayı/Issue 35 tutmaktadır. Literatürdeki bir argümana göre, bölgesel kurumların önemli roller oynadıkları müdahale pratiklerinin, yalnızca uluslararası aktörler tarafından gerçekleştirilen müdahalelere göre, uzun süreli barış ve güvenliğin sağlanmasında daha etkin sonuçlar verdiği belirtilmektedir. Bu makale, yazında tartışılan bu konuya katkı sunmak amacıyla Liberya barışinşaası müdahalesine ve bu müdahalede Batı Africa devletleri tarafından kurulmuş bir örgüt olan ECOWAS'ın rolüne odaklanmaktadır. Makale boyunca ECOWAS'ın bölgesel kimliğinin, müdahalenin bölgede yaşayan halklar ve politik aktörler tarafından iyi karşılanmasında kolaylaştırıcı rol oynadığı tezi geliştirilmektedir. Bu yönüyle, makale Liberya örneğinin uluslararası toplumun daha iyi bir müdahale çerçevesi oluşturması için dersler içerdiğinin altı çizilmiştir. Anahtar Kelimeler: İnsani müdahale, barışinşaası, Liberya, bölgesel kurumlar, uluslararası kurumlar, ECOWAS, Afrika, yerel sahiplenme. Introduction In his very influential book, Murphy (1996) asserts that the debate on whether the international society should intervene into the domestic spheres of nation-states in order to prevent humanitarian crises such as massacres, ethnic cleansing, genocide will constitute the core of the evolving world order in twenty first century (Murphy, 1996: 3-4). Several developments that occurred in the post-Cold War era support the prediction of Murphy and many others who suggested that humanitarian intervention will be in the center of world politics. We witnessed the massacres in Somalia (Clarke and Herbst, 1996), Bosnia (Western, 2002), Kosovo (Henkin, 1999) and the interventionist reaction of the international community to these tragedies, while its ambivalent position caused much more severe violent conflicts, even genocides, in several other cases such as Rwanda and Darfur. Although the way international society reacts to such crises became subject to significant criticism, humanitarian intervention, still, appears to be an efficient tool to prevent bloodshed especially in post-colonial contexts where state collapse causes rise of violent instability. According to Murphy (1996: 2-3) "though United Nations is not a world government and though its powers and ability to generate and enforce its commands are constrained by political pressures and reliance on ad hoc economic and military actions, it nevertheless provides new opportunities for enhancing a just world order through the use of humanitarian intervention in appropriate situations." Still, not all accounts on humanitarian intervention are positive. Humanitarian intervention as a legal framework and as a political tool practiced by international community is still a controversial issue in world politics. For instance, Bellamy (2005) criticizes the framework of responsibility to protect 2 SOSYAL VE BEŞERİ BİLİMLER ARAŞTIRMALARI DERGİSİ JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES RESEARCHES Güz/Autumn 2015-Sayı/Issue 35 which is used as a justification for humanitarian intervention and argues that the efficiency of humanitarian intervention is undermined due to the delinquent and mistaken use of this framework by the international community. In a harsher critique, Nardin (2005) argues that humanitarian intervention represents a new form of imperialism and instrumentalized by the global north to exploit the global south. Despite the existence of critiques, it is still considered as a legitimate tool of responding against humanitarian crises by international society. The literature increasingly focuses on the question of how to operate humanitarian intervention in more effective ways. In this debate, the identity of the interveners is a widely discussed subject. In this regard, a line of argument in the literature emphasizes that the likelihood of extracting successful outcome from an intervention is higher if the operation is practiced by a regional international organization because the operation would not be perceived as a foreign intervention (Levitt, 1998; Sarkin, 2009). This article addresses to this debate with a specific focus on the humanitarian intervention to Liberian civil war. Throughout the article, the argument emphasizes that the intervention to Liberian civil war is considered as a success story thanks to the efficient operations practiced by Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) and its military branch Economic Community of West African States Monitoring Group (ECOMOG), which are regional international organizations formed by West African countries. The article is organized into three (...truncated)