AHS VE BULANIK PROMETHEE YAKLAŞIMLARIYLA ESNEK ÜRETİM SİSTEMLERİ SEÇİMİ

Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Apr 2015

Selçuk Perçin, Tuba Yakıcı Ayan

Article PDF cannot be displayed. You can download it here:

http://dergipark.gov.tr/download/article-file/3932

AHS VE BULANIK PROMETHEE YAKLAŞIMLARIYLA ESNEK ÜRETİM SİSTEMLERİ SEÇİMİ

Marmara Üniversitesi øø%)'HUJLVL YIL 2010&ø/7;;,;, SAYI II, S. 555-575 $+69(%8/$1,.3520(7+((<$./$ù,0/$5,</$ (61(.h5(7ø06ø67(0/(5ø6(dø0ø 6HOoXN3(5dø1 7XED<DNÕFÕ$<$1 Özet (VQHN UHWLP VLVWHPOHUL (h6  LPDODW ILUPDODUÕQGD HVQHNOLN YH NDOLWH\L DUWÕUDQ VUHoWHNL LúL KD]ÕUOÕN ]DPDQODUÕQÕ VWRNODUÕ YH LVUDIÕ D]DOWDQ LOHUL UHWLP teknolojileridir. Bu nedenle en uygun EÜS VHoLPLILUPDODUÕQEDúDUÕVÕQGDNLHQNULWLN NRQXODUGDQ ELUL KDOLQH JHOPLúWLU (h6 VHoLPL NDUDU YHUPH VUHFLQGH oRN VD\ÕGD QLWHOYHQLFHONULWHULoHUHQoRNNULWHUOLNDUDUYHUPH d..9 SUREOHPLGLUdDOÕúPDGD EXDPDoOD(h6VHoLPLQGHX\JXODQDELOHFHNEWQOHúLNELUEXODQÕNd..9\DNODúÕPÕ |QHULOPLúYH|UQHNX\JXODPDVXQXOPXúWXU%XGR÷UXOWXGDOLWHUDWUGHQ\DUDUODQDUDN (h6 VHoLPLQL HWNLOH\HQ  DQD YH  DOW NULWHU EHOLUOHQPLúWLU 'DKD VRQUD $+6 \|QWHPLNXOODQÕODUDNWPNULWHUOHUHLOLúNLQD÷ÕUOÕNODUKHVDSODQPÕúWÕr. Bundan sonraki DúDPD EXODQÕN 3URPHWKHH \DNODúÕPÕQÕ NXOODQDUDN DOWHUQDWLI (h6¶QLQ VHoLP YH VÕUDODQPDVÕGÕU %X DPDoOD EHú (h6 DOWHUQDWLIL GH÷HUOHQGLULOPLú YH HQ X\JXQ DOWHUQDWLIVHoLOPLúWLU Anahtar Kelimeler: (VQHN hUHWLP 6LVWHPOHUL $QDOLWLN +L\HUDUúL 6üreci, %XODQÕN3URPHWKHHdRN.ULWHUOL.DUDU9HUPH d..9 FLEXIBLE MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS SELECTION USING AHP AND FUZZY PROMETHEE APPROACH Abstract Flexible manufacturing systems (FMSs) are considered to be advanced manufacturing technologies to improve flexibility and quality, reduce work-inprocess (WIP), inventory levels, manufacturing lead-times, and set up costs of a manufacturing company. Therefore, selecting the most appropriate flexible manufacturing system has emerged as the critical issue for the success of companies. FMS selection can be viewed as a multi-criteria decision making problem due to the availability of quantitative and qualitative criteria that have to be considered in the decision-making process. For these reasons, integrated fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making (FMCDM) methodology has been proposed and an illustrative example is presented. For this purpose, we have selected four main and 'Ro'U.DUDGHQL]7HNQLNhQLYHUVLWHVLøø%)øúOHWPH%|OPVSHUFLQ#NWXHGXWU <UG'Ro'U.DUDGHQL]7HNQLNhQLYHUVLWHVLøø%)(NRQRPHWUL%|OPD\DQ#NWXHGXWU 555 'Ro'U6HOoXN3(5dø1 <DUG'Ro'U7XED<$.,&,$<$1 twelve sub-criteria through literature review. Then, all the weights of criteria have been calculated by applying the AHP method. The fuzzy PPROMETHEE method is then employed to achieve the final ranking results. Five representative flexible manufacturing systems were evaluated and the most appropriate one was selected. Keywords: Flexible Manufacturing Systems, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Fuzzy Promethee, Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) *LULú .UHVHOOHúPH\OHELUOLNWHUHWLPIDDOL\HWOHULQGHUHNDEHWLQDUWPDVՁUHWLFLOHUL UQ oHúLWOHULQL DUWÕUPD\D YH WDOHS GH÷LúLNOHULQH KÕ]OD \DQÕW YHUPH\H ]RUODPÕúWÕU Esnek üretim sistemleri (Flexible Manufacturing Systems-(h6 EXDPDoODUÕ\HULQH JHWLUPHN DPDFÕ\OD JHOLúWLULOHQ LOHUL UHWLP WHNQRORMLOHULGLU (h6 URERWODU &1& WH]JkKODUÕ YH RWRPDWLN PDO]HPH WDúÕPD VLVWHPOHULQL LoHUHQ oRN VD\ÕGD ELOJLVD\DU NRQWUROO WHNQRORMLN ELOHúHQGHQ ROXúXU %X WHNQRORMLOHU DUDFÕOÕ÷Õ\OD ILUPDODU UQ oHúLWOHULQLQDUWÕUÕOPDVÕQÕNDOLWHQLQL\LOHúWLULOPHVLQLVUHoWHNLLúYHVWRNG]H\OHULQLQ GúUOPHVLQLYHKD]ÕUOÕN]DPDQODUÕQÕQD]DOWÕOPDVÕQÕVD÷ODPDNWDGÕU1. EÜS seçimi firmalar için stratejik bir karar verme problemidir. EÜS VLVWHPOHULQLQ VHoLP YH GH÷HUOHQGLULOPHVL oDOÕúPDODUÕQGD oRN VD\ÕGD NULWHU YH EX NULWHUOHUDUDVÕQGDNLLOLúNLOHULPDWHPDWLNVHOPRGHOOHU\DUGÕPÕ\ODDoÕNOD\DQoRNVD\ÕGD \|QWHP NXOODQÕOPÕúWÕU (Q L\L (h6¶QLQ VHoLOPHVL ELU GL]L NDUPDúÕN IDNW|UQ J|] |QQGH EXOXQGXUXOPDVÕQÕ JHUHNWLUHQ oRN NULWHUOL NDUDU YHUPH 0XOti Criteria Decision Making-d..9  SUREOHPLGLU *HQHO RODUDN d..9 WHNQLNOHUL oRN VD\ÕGD ELUELULQGHQ ED÷ÕPVÕ] IDNW|UQ HWNLVLQL GLNNDWH DODUDN NDUDU YHULFL\H HQ X\JXQ VHoHQH÷LQ EHOLUOHQPHVLQGH \DUGÕPFÕ RODQ \DNODúÕPODUGÕU %X \DNODúÕPODU LoHULVLQGH en popüler olanlardan birisi DQDOLWLN KL\HUDUúL VUHFL $QDO\WLc Hierarchy ProcessAHS) ve ELUGL÷HULLVHoRN|OoWOGH÷HUOHQGLUPHOHULoLQWHUFLKOLVÕUDODPD 3UHIHUHQFH ranking organization method for enrichment evaluation-Promethee) yöntemleridir. Bu yöntemlerL GL÷HU d..9 WHNQLNOHULQGHQ D\ÕUDQ ELU WDNÕP VWQONOHU YDUGÕU øON RODUDN $+6 YH 3URPHWKHH \|QWHPOHUL NDUDU YHULFLOHULQ QLWHO YH QLFHO IDNW|UOHUL ELUOLNWH GH÷HUOHQGLUGL÷L GXUXPODUGD NXOODQÕOPDNWDGÕU øNLQFL RODUDN $+6 \|QWHPL NDUDU SUREOHPLQLQ KL\HUDUúLN ELU PRGHO \DUGÕPÕ\OD LIDGH HGLOPHVL YH kriterlerin önem düzeylerinin belirlenmesinde, Promethee yöntemi ise, alternatiflerin VHoLP YH VÕUDODQPDVÕQGD NXOODQÕOPDNWDGÕU $\UÕFD EX \|QWHPOHU ELUH\ \D GD JUXS NDUDUÕQD GD\DOÕ RODUDN X\JXODQDELOPHNWH YH JHoHUlilikleri test edilebilmektedir. Bir EDúND VWQON LVH 3URPHWKHH \|QWHPLQGH NDUDU YHULFLOHULQ GH÷HUOHQGLULOHQ WP NULWHUOHULoLQIDUNOÕWHUFLKIRQNVL\RQODUÕYHWHUFLKHúLNOHULWDQÕPOD\DELOPHOHULGLU6RQ olarak bu yöntemler, karar probleminin belirsizlik LoHUGL÷L GXUXPODUGD EXODQÕN NPH WHRULVL LOH EWQOHúWLULOHELOPHNWHGLU %XODQÕN NPH WHRULVL JQON \DúDQWÕGD NDUúÕODúÕODQSUREOHPOHULQWDPRODUDNPRGHOOHQHPHGL÷LEHOLUVL]lik içeren durumlarda NXOODQÕOÕU %X WU GXUXPODUGD SUREOHPOHU X]PDQODUÕQ ELOJL YH deneyimlerinden \DUDUODQÕODUDN GLOVHO GH÷LúNHQOHU \DUGÕPÕ\OD VD\ÕVDOODúWÕUÕOÕU YH NXUXODQ PRGHOOHU 1 E.E. Karsak-O. Kuzgunkaya, “A Fuzzy Multiple Objective Programming Approach for the Selection of a Flexible Manufacturing System”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 79, No. 2, 2002, s. 101. 556 DUDFÕOÕ÷Õ\OD o|]OU %X GR÷UXOWXGD oDOÕúPDQÕQ WHPHO DPDFÕQÕ (h6¶QLQ VHoLPLQGH $+6 YH EXODQÕN 3URPHWKHH \DNODúÕPODUÕQÕQ QDVÕO ELUOLNWH NXOODQÕODELOHFH÷LQL DoÕNODPDNROXúWXUPDNWDGÕU dDOÕúPD o E|OPGHQ ROXúPDNWDGÕU dDOÕúPDGD |QFHOLNOH ILUPDODUÕQ (h6 VHoLPLQGHNXOODQGÕNODUÕNULWHUOHUYHX\JXODGÕNODUÕ\|QWHPOHUOLWHUDWUDUDúWÕUPDVÕQGDQ \DUDUODQÕODUDN WDQÕWÕODFDNWÕU dDOÕúPDQÕQ X\JXODPD NÕVPÕQGD |UQHN ELU X\Julama PRGHOL |QHULOHFHN YH |QHULOHQ PRGHO \DUGÕPÕ\OD ELU LPDODW ILUPDVÕ LoLQ HQ uygun (h6VHoLOHFHNWLUdDOÕúPDQÕQVRQXoNÕVPÕQGDLVHHOGHHGLOHQEXOJXODUWDUWÕúÕODFDNWÕU 1. EÜS Seçimini Etkileyen Kriterler (h6 VHoLPLQL HWNLOH\HQ oRN VD\ÕGD QLWHO YH QLFHO IDNW|U EXOXQPDNWDGÕU Shang ve Sueyoshi2 IDUNOÕ (h6¶QLQ HWNLQOLNOHULQL NDUúÕODúWÕUGÕ÷Õ oDOÕúPDVÕQGD EX VLVWHPOHULQVHoLPLQGH NXOODQÕODELOHFHNLNL JLUGLYH ooÕNWÕ |OoV|QHUPLúWLU%XQD J|UHVHUPD\HYHIDDOL\HWPDOL\HWOHULWRSODPÕLOHILUPDQÕQDODQLKWL\DFÕJLUGL|OoV RODUDNVUHoWHNLLúLQL\LOHúWLULOPHVLJHFLNHQLú\]GHVLYHJHUoHNOHúHQUHWLP (...truncated)


This is a preview of a remote PDF: http://dergipark.gov.tr/download/article-file/3932
Article home page: http://dergipark.gov.tr/muiibd/issue/487/4535

Selçuk Perçin, Tuba Yakıcı Ayan. AHS VE BULANIK PROMETHEE YAKLAŞIMLARIYLA ESNEK ÜRETİM SİSTEMLERİ SEÇİMİ, Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 2015, pp. 555-575, Volume 2, Issue 29,