Abnormal N400 Semantic Priming Effect May Reflect Psychopathological Processes in Schizophrenia: A Twin Study
Hindawi
Schizophrenia Research and Treatment
Volume 2017, Article ID 7163198, 10 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7163198
Research Article
Abnormal N400 Semantic Priming Effect May Reflect
Psychopathological Processes in Schizophrenia: A Twin Study
Anuradha Sharma,1 Heinrich Sauer,2 Holger Hill,3 Claudia Kaufmann,4
Stephan Bender,5 and Matthias Weisbrod1,6
1
Research Group Neurocognition, Department of General Psychiatry, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine,
Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
2
Department of Psychiatry, University of Jena, Jena, Germany
3
Institute of Sports and Sports Science, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany
4
Department of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
5
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
6
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, SRH Hospital Karlsbad-Langensteinbach, Karlsbad, Germany
Correspondence should be addressed to Anuradha Sharma;
Received 28 November 2016; Revised 22 May 2017; Accepted 13 June 2017; Published 28 August 2017
Academic Editor: Markus Jäger
Copyright © 2017 Anuradha Sharma et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution
License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly
cited.
Objective. Activation of semantic networks is indexed by the N400 effect. We used a twin study design to investigate whether
N400 effect abnormalities reflect genetic/trait liability or are related to psychopathological processes in schizophrenia. Methods.
We employed robust linear regression to compare N400 and behavioral priming effects across 36 monozygotic twin pairs (6
pairs concordant for schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder, 11 discordant pairs, and 19 healthy control pairs) performing a lexical
decision task. Moreover, we examined the correlation between Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) score and the N400 effect and
the influence of medication status on this effect. Results. Regression yielded a significant main effect of group on the N400 effect
only in the direct priming condition (𝑝 = 0.003). Indirect condition and behavioral priming effect showed no significant effect
of group. Planned contrasts with the control group as a reference group revealed that affected concordant twins had significantly
reduced N400 effect compared to controls, and discordant affected twins had a statistical trend for reduced N400 effect compared
to controls. The unaffected twins did not differ significantly from the controls. There was a trend for correlation between reduced
N400 effect and higher BPRS scores, and the N400 effect did not differ significantly between medicated and unmedicated patients.
Conclusions. Reduced N400 effect may reflect disease-specific processes in schizophrenia implicating frontotemporal brain network
in schizophrenia pathology.
1. Introduction
Language impairment is considered as one of the hallmark
symptoms of schizophrenia. Abnormal semantic priming
has been reported in schizophrenia patients in various
studies that have used different measures and experimental
paradigms [1–4]. Semantic priming refers to the facilitated
processing of a target stimulus when it is preceded by
a semantically related stimulus or context. Traditionally,
semantic priming studies in schizophrenia have used reduction in reaction times in primed trials as an index of semantic
priming (e.g., [5, 6]). However, more recently, priming studies
in schizophrenia have focused on the N400 [7–10] which
is a negative-going event-related potential (ERP) peaking
at centroparietal scalp sites around 400 ms after the target
stimuli that are not primed by the preceding context. N400
was first identified by Kutas and Hillyard as an ERP reflecting
semantic association between words elicited 400 ms after
the presentation of unexpected endings of sentences [11, 12]
and has been researched extensively in the following years
(reviewed, e.g., in [13]). Although originally observed in the
context of sentences with unpredictable endings, N400 can
2
also be evoked by isolated words, for example, the target
word in a lexical decision task, and the amplitude of the
N400 is considerably modified by the semantic relatedness
of a previously presented word (prime) [13, 14]. Targets that
have been primed by the preceding context show a reduced
(less negative/more positive) N400 and this reduction, called
the N400 effect, has been attributed to the activation of
related semantic networks by the prime leading to facilitated
processing of the target [15].
Although many studies have found the N400 effect to
be abnormal in schizophrenia, the question of whether these
abnormalities reflect trait markers of schizophrenia or rather
reflect disease-related processes is unclear. Studies that have
addressed this issue in a family design [16–19] have used
different paradigms to evaluate N400 abnormalities in firstdegree family members of schizophrenia patients and have
reported inconsistent results. Kimble et al. (2000) [16] found
the N400 effect in a sentence paradigm to be reduced in high
schizotypy individuals but not in unaffected family members
of schizophrenia patients. Kiang et al. (2014) [18] reported
no differences between healthy controls and unaffected firstdegree relatives of schizophrenia patients for the N400 effect;
Guerra et al. (2009) [17], on the other hand, found a reduced
N400 effect also in unaffected first-degree family members
of patients. Pfeifer et al. (2012) [19] reported an abnormal
N400 effect only for the indirect semantic condition in
schizophrenia patients compared to healthy controls but
failed to find differences between unaffected siblings and
controls. Two studies looking at effects of medication have
reported only limited effects of medication on the N400
amplitude during word recognition [20] and N400 priming
effect in a lexical decision task [21] in schizophrenia patients.
A useful alternative approach to examine this issue is to
compare monozygotic twins concordant and discordant for
schizophrenia with healthy twin pairs. Unlike first-degree
relatives (who share only 50% of their genetic material),
monozygotic twins share 100% of their genes and differences
in phenotypic traits can be attributed to differential environmental exposure and/or disease or epigenetic processes.
Although different more complex models may be employed
to address the question of genetic versus environmental
processes, the twin study design provides enough theoretical
grounding and power for qualitative modeling of these effects
and has been employed widely across heritability studies
(e.g., [22]). We compared the N400 effect across a group
of monozygotic twin pairs concordant and discordant for
schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder and healthy control
pairs as they performed a lexical decision task (other data
fr (...truncated)