Freedom of Religion and the Legal Status of Religion in Russia

Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe, Dec 1997

By Larisa Skuratovskaya, Published on 04/01/97

Article PDF cannot be displayed. You can download it here:

https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1743&context=ree

Freedom of Religion and the Legal Status of Religion in Russia

Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe Volume 17 | Issue 2 Article 1 4-1997 Freedom of Religion and the Legal Status of Religion in Russia Larisa Skuratovskaya Academy of Medical Science, Moscow, Russia Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/ree Part of the Christianity Commons, and the Law Commons Recommended Citation Skuratovskaya, Larisa (1997) "Freedom of Religion and the Legal Status of Religion in Russia," Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe: Vol. 17: Iss. 2, Article 1. Available at: http://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/ree/vol17/iss2/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ George Fox University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ George Fox University. FREEDOM OF RELIGION AND THE LEGAL STATUS OF RELIGION IN RUSSIA By Larisa Skuratovskaya Dr. Larisa Skuratovskaya (Russian Orthodox) is a medical doctor at the Institute of General pathology and Patho-physiology at the Academy of medical Science in Moscow, Russia. She is interested in women;s rights, anti-nuclear campaigns, religious freedom, environmental and socio-medical advocacy. This paper was written in February 1996 while she was a trainee of the Center for the Study of Human Rights, Columbia University and European Commission of Human Rights, Strassbourg, France. With Russia's accession to the Council of Europe, this pan-European organization now stretches from the Pacific Ocean in the East to the Atlantic Ocean in the West. Thus, de Gaulle's dream of a United States of Europe which seemed to be unreal became true. It is of great importance that respect of human rights is guaranteed to the citizens of the countries which are members of the Council of Europe. Relations between not only states and high contracting parties, but also between a citizen and state are regulated by laws based on international principles. Forty-eight years have gone by since the summit in The Hague took place in 1948, at which the Congress of Europe decided to establish the Council of Europe--a council of federations open to all democratic countries that respect human rights. All the states of the world closely watched the development of this international organization. Although some states already declared the guarantee of fundamental freedoms of citizens at the beginning of the eighteenth century (first on the basis of the Declaration of the United States (1776) and then France (1789)), such declarations did not have solid juridical ground, especially in Europe until the end of the World War II (the Supreme Court of the United States used to be the unique court examining cases of the violation of fundamental freedoms of citizens, providing in this way the fulfillment of law). In Rome, on November 4, 1950, in order to secure the observance of the obligations entered into by High Contracting Parties, the European Commission of Human Rights and the European Court of Human Rights were established. The Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms was signed in Rome on November 7, 1950, at the governmental level. It was based on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, approved by the General Assembly of the United Nations Organization on December 10, 1948, and entered into force on September 3, 1953. The European Convention on Human Rights established the first international system for the protection of fundamental freedoms based on law. It also contributed to the revision of state laws protected by the system of local courts. In the countries where the provisions of the Convention are not in local laws, it is extremely difficult for courts to claim their fulfillment. Reverse connection which contributes to democratic development of the state is being infringed. That is why among the requirements for new states acceding to the Council of Europe, there are conditions in the country to guarantee the observance of human rights. Before the end of the Cold War, accession of new states was relatively infrequent, but since November 1990, fourteen countries from central and eastern Europe have joined the Council of Europe, bringing the number of member states from 25 to 39. In Russia, as a republic within the Soviet Union, democratic reforms stemmed from the policy of the government headed by Mikhail Gorbachev. Soon after the beginning of the Conference for Security and Cooperation in Europe (CSCE) Summit in Vienna (November 4, 1986) the Russian Government made a sensational statement offering to hold a conference on questions of humanitarian cooperation in Moscow. It was common knowledge that human rights were being violated in the Soviet Union and that the Russian society lagged far behind in regard to democratic standards. It was a very important step demonstrating the new direction of the Soviet state's development. Five days later, Gorbachev telephoned Alexander Sakharov, who lived in exile in Gorky, and informed him that he was free and could return to Moscow. When those who met Sakharov at the railway station asked him whether he considered his liberation as a beginning of democratic reforms in the country, he answered that he would believe this when all political prisoners were released. It should be mentioned that one of the first steps of the government in this direction was the declaration of freedom of religion. The main reason for this was that freedom of religion was one of the most important rights stipulated by the CSCE. The issue of the violation of religious freedom in the USSR has been criticized by the international community more than once. Besides, it was not necessary to break structures of authority. This question had to be settled in view of the coming of the 1000th anniversary of the Russian Orthodox Church, and the far less important 70th anniversary of the "Decree on the Separation of the Church from the State and the Church from the School" which was signed by V. I. Lenin (January 23, 1918). Confirming the stability of constitutional principles, the leaders contributed to perestroika's success. At the official reception of the Patriarch and the Holy Synod of the Russian Orthodox Church on April 29, 1988, in the Kremlin, Mikhail Gorbachev confirmed the intention to protect general human values. Official bodies began to demonstrate all possible means of guaranteeing religious freedoms in the Soviet Union. Even Konstantin Kharchev, President of the Council for Religious Affairs of the Council Of Ministers of the USSR, whose name was closely associated with putting pressure on religious organizations for a quarter of a century, criticized the situation with religious groups in the USSR during his stay in the USA, and spoke about launching a new policy in connection with perestroika, establishing conditions for religious freedom. It was not surprising that such questions were raised in the (...truncated)


This is a preview of a remote PDF: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1743&context=ree
Article home page: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/ree/vol17/iss2/1

Larisa Skuratovskaya. Freedom of Religion and the Legal Status of Religion in Russia, Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe, 1997, Volume 17, Issue 2,