Correction to: Hepcidin Mediates Transcriptional Changes in Ferroportin mRNA in Differentiated Neuronal-like PC12 Cells Subjected to Iron Challenge
Molecular Neurobiology
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-018-1282-7
CORRECTION
Correction to: Hepcidin Mediates Transcriptional Changes in Ferroportin
mRNA in Differentiated Neuronal-like PC12 Cells Subjected
to Iron Challenge
Steinunn Sara Helgudottir 1 & Jacek Lichota 1 & Annette Burkhart 1 & Torben Moos 1
# Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018
Correction to: Mol Neurobiol
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-018-1241-3
The original version of this article unfortunately contained
mistakes on Figs. 1, 2, and 7 as some of the data were not
visible. With this, the correct images are hereby published.
In Table 4 footnote, "Forty millimolar40 mM" should be
changed two times to "Forty millimolar (40mM)". Also layout
of Tables 2 - 4 were changed as per request of authors.
Corrected Tables are presented herewith.
The online version of the original article can be found at https://doi.org/
10.1007/s12035-018-1241-3
* Torben Moos
1
Laboratory of Neurobiology, Biomedicine Group, Department of
Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Fr. Bajers Vej
3B, 1.216, DK-9220 Aalborg East, Denmark
Mol Neurobiol
Fig. 1 a–d Growth properties of PC12 cells before (a) and after receiving
50 ng/mLNGF-β for 1, 3, and 6 daysDIV(b–d). Eighty to ninety percent
of the cells display differentiated morphology after 6 DIV. e–h Areas
marked with respective squares in a–d shown in higher magnification
obtained by computed enlargement. The PC12 cells differentiate into
cells with morphological changes corresponding to neurons with
polygonal cell bodies and extended cellular processes with several
branches sharing the morphology of mature neurites. Scale bar = 200 μm
Fig. 2 a–b Confocal images of differentiated PC12 cells after 6 days of
treatment with NGF-β revealing protein expression and cellular
localization of Tubb4b (a, d) (green) and ferroportin (b, e) (red). Nuclei
are counterstained with DAPI (blue). d–e Areas marked with respective
squares in a–c shown in higher magnification obtained by computed
enlargement. The extended processes of the differentiated PC12 cells
are clearly seen in these high-power magnifications. c, f Merged photos.
Scale bar = 20 μm
Mol Neurobiol
Fig. 7 Overview of our hypothesis regarding the action of hepcidin on
Fpn mRNA in NGF-β differentiated PC12 cells depending on the iron
status. (Left) In iron overload, a strong upregulation of Fpn mRNA is
mediated by hepcidin. This could lead to increase translation of Fpn
mRNA and hence more ferroportin protein (yellow dots) in spite
hepcidin also provokes a degradation of the ferroportin when present in
the cellular membrane. A raised cytosolic appearance of ferroportin may
Table 2
nonetheless aid capture of excess iron and prevent ROS-mediated
damage caused by unbound intracellular iron. (Right) In cellular iron
deficiency, hepcidin mediates a decrease in Fpn mRNA expression,
which lowers the translational and presence of ferroportin protein
(yellow dots) in the cellular membrane. In turn, this increases the
survival of the cell by retaining iron intracellularly to facilitate its
availability
Primers used for RT-qPCR
Target
Forward primer
Reverse primer
Fth
Ftl
Hdac1
GACCACCGCGTCTCCCTCGC
TGACGTGGCTTTGGAAGGCG
GCTGAGGAGATGACCAAG
CAGGGCCACATCATCCCGGTC
GATGGCTTCTGCACATCCTGG
GTGGACAACTGACAGAAC
Phf8
CCAGAAAGCAAAGCTCAA
GCACTGTCTACCTTCTTC
Tet1
GAGTCTTCACCATGACAC
GGACATGAATTCTTAGAACTATC
Table 3 The expression of Fpn mRNA after treatment with various concentrations of FAC in combination with a fixed concentration of hepcidin.
Values below 1 indicate downregulation of Fpn mRNA expression, and values above 1 the reverse.
Treatment group
Ratio (treatment/control)
Effect on Fpn mRNA
Significance
FAC 10 mM
FAC 20 mM
FAC 30 mM
FAC 6 mM + 1.0 μM hepcidin
FAC 20 mM + 1.0 μM hepcidin
FAC 20 mM + 1.0 μM hepcidin/FAC 20 mM
0.889
1.49
5.97
14.122
95.14
93.92
(↓)
(↑)
(↑)
(↑)
↑
↑
n.s
n.s
n.s
n.s
***
***
The expression of Fpn after treatment with FAC is normalized to that of the control group receiving no treatment, whereas the expression of Fpn after
treatment with FAC in combination with hepcidin is normalized to the group receiving 1.0 μM hepcidin. Effects presented in brackets display tendency
without significance. Combining 20 mM FAC and 1.0 μM hepcidin upregulates the expression of Fpn, approximately times 90. A comparison between
the treatments with 20 mM FAC and 20 mM FAC in combination with 1.0 μM hepcidin, measured as the ratio of expression, demonstrates a significant
increase mediated by hepcidin to the two situations with identical concentrations of FAC. Significance: ***p = 0.0001–-0.001, n.s. not significant.
Mol Neurobiol
Table 4
The expression of Fpn mRNA after treatment with 40 mM DFO in combination with 2.3 μM hepcidin.
Treatment group
Ratio (treatment/control)
Effect on Fpn mRNA
Significance
DFO 40 mM
8.81
↑
*
DFO 40 mM + 2.3 μM hepcidin
0.42
↓
n.s.
20.63
↑
**
DFO 40 mM/DFO 40 mM +2.3 μM hepcidin
Values below 1 indicate a downregulation of Fpn mRNA expression, and values above 1 the reverse. The expression of Fpn after treatment with DFO is
normalized to that of the control group receiving no treatment, whereas the expression of Fpn after treatment with DFO in combination with hepcidin is
normalized to the group receiving 2.3 μM hepcidin. Forty millimolar (40mM) DFO upregulates Fpn significantly. Forty millimolar (40mM) DFO
combined with 2.3 μM hepcidin results in downregulation of Fpn mRNA. A comparison between the treatments with (40mM) DFO and (40mM) DFO +
2.3 μM hepcidin, measured as the ratio of expression, reveals strong upregulation of Fpn mRNA in the single treatment group without hepcidin with an
approximately 20 times higher expression. Significance: *p = 0.01–-0.05, ** p = 0.001–-0.01, n.s. not significant.
(...truncated)