Table of Content

Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review Volume 19 | Issue 1 Article 1 Table of Content Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/iplr Part of the Intellectual Property Commons Repository Citation Table of Content, 19 Marq. Intellectual Property L. Rev. (2015). Available at: http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/iplr/vol19/iss1/1 This Prefatory Matter is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Marquette Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review by an authorized administrator of Marquette Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact . MARQUETTE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW REVIEW Volume 19 Winter 2015 Number 1 2014 ANNUAL HELEN WILSON NIES LECTURE IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY THE INTENSIFYING NATIONAL INTEREST IN PATENT LITIGATION The Honorable Kathleen M. O’Malley .............................................................. 1 ARTICLES THE EU TRADEMARK REFORM PACKAGE—(TOO) BOLD A STEP AHEAD OR BACK TO STATUS QUO? Annette Kur ...................................................................................................... 15 BRANDS, MORALITY AND PUBLIC POLICY: SOME REFLECTIONS ON THE BAN ON REGISTRATION OF CONTROVERSIAL TRADEMARKS Enrico Bonadio ................................................................................................ 39 CAN THE PTO FIND ITS WAY WITH JESUS? Lee B. Burgunder ............................................................................................. 63 COMMENTS A PRESIDENTIAL REMEDY UNDER ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROL—WHY SECTION 337(J) SHOULD BE REPEALED Nicolaas T. Bressers ........................................................................................ 99 NOTICE AND SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTRATION: WHY THE COPYRIGHT OFFICE MUST UPDATE ITS POLICIES SURROUNDING AUTHOR NOTICE Erin E. Kaprelian ........................................................................................... 121 THE END OF THE “WILD WEST” FOR SOFTWARE PATENTS—DOES THE PATENTS ACT 2013 CHANGE NEW ZEALAND’S TREATMENT OF SOFTWARE PATENTS FROM PERMISSIVE TO RESTRICTIVE? Erin E. Block .................................................................................................. 141  (...truncated)