Depositional History of the St. Joe and Boone Formations in Northern Arkansas
Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science
Volume 40
Article 22
1986
Depositional History of the St. Joe and Boone
Formations in Northern Arkansas
Phillip R. Shelby
University of Arkansas, Fayetteville
Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas
Part of the Stratigraphy Commons
Recommended Citation
Shelby, Phillip R. (1986) "Depositional History of the St. Joe and Boone Formations in Northern Arkansas," Journal of the Arkansas
Academy of Science: Vol. 40 , Article 22.
Available at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas/vol40/iss1/22
This article is available for use under the Creative Commons license: Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0). Users are able to
read, download, copy, print, distribute, search, link to the full texts of these articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior
permission from the publisher or the author.
This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the Arkansas Academy
of Science by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact , .
Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 40 [1986], Art. 22
DEPOSITIONAL HISTORY OF THE ST. JOE AND
BOONE FORMATIONS IN NORTHERN ARKANSAS
PHILLIP R. SHELBY
Department of Geology
University of Arkansas
Fayetteville, AR 72701
ABSTRACT
The Kinderhookian-Osagean (Lower Mississippian) St. Joe and Boone Limestone represent an unconformity bounded transgressive-regressive sequence widely distributed throughout the southern midcontinent. An irregular erosional surface developed on the Chattanooga Shale (Upper Devonian) or older strata.
As Mississippian Seas transgressed, they deposited a thin interval of sandstone, shale, or the two together
derived from these old beds. Carbonate deposition was initiated as grain-dominated, crinozoan-bryozoan
packstones and grainstones, with subordinate wackestones, and is essentially chert free. These carbonates,
referred to as the St. Joe Limestone, reflect a ramp across northern Arkansas that experienced condensed sedimentation and red coloration along its conditions reflected by carbonate mudstones, very
fine-grained packstones and grainstones, and penecontemperaneous chert of the overlying lower Boone
Formation. The upper Boone (Burlington-Keokuk equivalents) represents a regressive sequence that returned St. Joe-type, grain-dominated, lithologies with diagenetic chert replacement to the shelf. The regression terminated in a pronounced regional unconformity overlain by Meramecian or younger strata.
i
INTRODUCTION
DEPOSITIONAL HISTORY
Kinderhookian and Osagean rocks crop out on the southwestern flank
of the Ozark dome in southwestern Missouri, northern Arkansas, and
northeastern Oklahoma. The St. Joe and Boone Formations (and
equivalent strata) form this Lower Mississippian sequence and develop
the Springfield Plateau across this area. The Lower Mississippian interval consists of an unconformity-bounded carbonate package with
the St. Joe being predominantly chert-free and the Boone consisting
of chert-bearing carbonates* (Fig. 1).
The principal area of study include portions of northern Arkansas
extending from the Oklahoma-Arkansas border eastward as far as Stone
County, Arkansas (Fig. 2). A total of nine surface section localities were
sampled and described from this area. Additionally, data from 159 subsurface well logs were used toconstruct an isopachous map of the Boone
Formation to illustrate thickness trends throughout the region. This
investigation involves a detailed petrologic study of the St. Joe-Boone
interval, resulting inthe delineation of various carbonate facies which
ultimately gives an insight into the depositional history of the sequence.
The Kinderhookian-Osagean (Lower Mississippian) St. Joe and Boone
Formations were deposited on a broad carbonate ramp designated as
the Burlington Shelf by Lane (1978). Innorthern Arkansas, these formations represent deposition on a ramp at the southern edge of this
shelf that extended southward into siliceous sediments of the Marat honOuachita Trough.
The St. Joe and Boone Limestones represent an unconformity
bounded, transgressive-regressive sequence. As Mississippian seas transgressed, an irregular erosional surface developed on rocks of Ordovician, Silurian, and Devonian age (Thompson and Fellows, 1970). The
Bachelor Member of the St. Joe Formation represents the initial transgression of these seas and is generally recognized as a thin interval of
greenish shale, a light-colored sandstone, or the two together derived
from older strata (Post, 1982). Carbonate deposition was initiated as
grain-dominated, crinozoan-bryozoan packstones, with subordinate
grainstones and wackestones, and is essentially chert-free (Shanks, 1976)
(Fig. 3). These carbonates, referred to as the St. Joe Limestone, were
deposited in relatively shallow waters initially with gradual deepening
represented by strata of the lower Boone. In some areas, this change
is marked by carbonate mudstones and wackestones (Fig. 3). Inother
areas, such as the Buffalo River section, it is marked by an abrupt
decrease in grain-size which can be attributed to the lack of mud in
the area during this time (Figs. 3, 4). Moving up through the Boone
interval many surges of grain movement produce repeated cycles of carbonate strata. These cycles are reflected by repetition of grain sizes,
allochemical content, and facies throughout the Boone interval (Fig.
4). However, upper Boone strata generally represent shallower water
conditions than do those of the lower Boone, reflecting a regressive
sequence ending with uppermost Boone deposition. This regression
terminated in a pronounced regional unconformity overlain by Meramecian or younger strata.
MERAMECIAN OR YOUNGER STRATA
CHATTANOOGA OR
.
OLDER STRATA
Figure 1 Stratigraphic nomenclature ofLower Mississippian rocks in
Missouri, Oklahoma, and Arkansas.
Shallow Versus Deep Carbonates
Similar lithologies may be found in shallow and deep water settings
due primarily to transportation of relatively shallow water sediments
into deeper water settings. Wilson (1975) notes the documentation of
several limestone turbidite facies deposited inrelatively deep water settings. However, several characteristics may be used to differentiate between shallow and deep water carbonates.
Certain sedimentary structures are indicative of shallow marine settings, for example, the presence ofcurrent structures such as ripple marks
and low angle trough cross stratification. Although some current structures are known from both deep and shallow environments, current
activity would be much more pronounced in shallow settings, where
tidal and storm activity commonly effect bottom sediments. Mudcracks
are also common indicators of shallow water deposition. Character of
Proceedings
Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. XXXX,1986
Published by Arkansas Academy of S (...truncated)