Zooplankton Community Abundance and Diversity in Dardanelle Reservoir, Arkansas, 1981-1990
Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science
Volume 46
Article 7
1992
Zooplankton Community Abundance and
Diversity in Dardanelle Reservoir, Arkansas,
1981-1990
John D. Rickett
University of Arkansas at Little Rock
Robert L. Watson
University of Arkansas at Little Rock
Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas
Part of the Fresh Water Studies Commons, Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons, and the
Water Resource Management Commons
Recommended Citation
Rickett, John D. and Watson, Robert L. (1992) "Zooplankton Community Abundance and Diversity in Dardanelle Reservoir,
Arkansas, 1981-1990," Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science: Vol. 46 , Article 7.
Available at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas/vol46/iss1/7
This article is available for use under the Creative Commons license: Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0). Users are able to
read, download, copy, print, distribute, search, link to the full texts of these articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior
permission from the publisher or the author.
This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the Arkansas Academy
of Science by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact , .
Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 46 [1992], Art. 7
JOHN D. RICKETT and ROBERT L WATSON
Biology Department
University ofArkansas at LittleRock
LittleRock, AR 72204
ABSTRACT
Zooplankton samples were collected quarterly from five stations representing the discharge bay
and four "control"or "dispersing impact" stations. Rotifers dominated all samples numerically and by
the number of taxa. All major groups (Rotifera, Cladocera, Copepoda, and Protozoa) exhibited
greatest abundances during the summer. Quarterly variations in abundance and number of taxa were
documented. Except for an increase in taxonomic analysis detail between 1981 and 1984 resulting in
several more taxa added to the list, no long-term increases, declines or repeating cycles were
apparent. Margalef's Richness Index reflected this change and showed a long-term increase with
evidence of a 5- to 6-year repeating cycle. Shannon's Heterogeneity and Pielou's Evenness Indices
showed no obvious trend or cycle. When these variables at Sta. 5 (discharge) were compared with
other stations, no significant differences (a = 0.05) were documented..
INTRODUCTION
Environmental studies on Dardanelle Reservoir have included
plankton surveys (Palko 1970; Rickett and Watson 1983a, 1983b),
surveys of radionuclides (Chittenden 1979, 1980) and general water
chemistry (Rickett and Watson 1985). Several of these studies, including
the present one, have been funded by Arkansas Power & Light Company
(presently Entergy Corporation) to determine the environmental
compatibility of the operation of Arkansas Nuclear One, a generating
of this facility
facility located on the north shore of the reservoir. Unit I
began commercial production in 197S and uses reservoir water pumped
once through for condenser cooling. Rickett and Watson (1983a)
described the general structure of the zooplankton community (taxa,
abundances and temporal variations) between 1975 and 1983.
The principal objective of this project segment has been to document
longer term impacts, ifany, of plant operation on the composition and
variations in the zooplankton community for the period 1981 through
1990. A secondary objective of this report was to review river discharge
variations and relate such variations, ifpossible, to variations in the
zooplankton community.
.
Figure 1 Dardanelle Reservoir in the vicinity of ANO with sampling sites
noted.
SITE DESCRIPTION
Dardanelle Reservoir was created on the main channel of the Arkansas
River by the Kerr-McClellan Navigation System in the early 1960s and
has been managed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Rickett and
Watson (1985) reported morphometric data on the reservoir and a general
description of watershed components. Since 1985 additional housing and
urban development have occurred north and west of the city of
Russellville, and limited development of agriculture and silviculture has
occurred elsewhere in the watershed. There have also been minor
development projects such as roads, small businesses and individual
housing units inthe watershed area.
Five stations were established to sample different general areas of the
reservoir as well as to compare four "control" stations with the discharge
station (Figure 1). The intake and upstream control stations (16 and 21,
respectively) were distanced beyond the influence of the thermal
discharge (5), whereas the mid-lake station (11) was expected to be
withinits influence. By the time discharge water reached the downstream
station (15), no residual heat was expected to remain.
METHODS
Depth-integrated zooplankton samples were collected quarterly at five
stations on the reservoir during the years 1981-1990. Two hundred liters
of water were pumped through a Wisconsin-style plankton net having 80micron mesh size, and the filtrate was preserved with Meyer's fixative.
Approximately two-thirds of the volume was taken from the surface to
0.3 m depth, whereas the remaining third was taken equally from 0.3 to
3.0 m, a depth generally representing the lower margin of the euphoric
zone. In the lab, sample aliquots were placed in a Sedgwick -Rafter
counting cell and viewed at lOOx with a Nikon inverted microscope
equipped with a mechanical stage. Organisms were identified to genus
and tabulated as number per liter.
Community structure was described by evaluating zooplankton
abundances, number of taxa, and three indices of diversity: Margalef's
Richness, Shannon's Heterogeneity and Pielou's Evenness (see Appendix
for formulae and notations). The Margalef formula compares the number
Proceedings Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 46, 1992
Published by Arkansas Academy of Science, 1992
57
57
Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 46 [1992], Art. 7
fiGoGrvoir^ /^iKcinSflS, iwO ii99U
£Oopi9riKXon /adljnuance orivi i/iv©rsiiy in l/cJiQcJiigiiG
of taxa in a sample and the total number of organisms comprising those
taxa. The Shannon index evaluates how the individuals are distributed
among the taxa, whereas the Pielou Evenness index is somewhat more
sensitive than Shannon's in that it relates the distribution if the
individuals back to the number of taxa in the sample. For all indices used,
an increase in number of taxa without changing the number of
individuals, or a decrease in the number ofindividuals or individuals per
taxon without changing the number of taxa produces a larger calculated
value, a feature which must be considered for interpretation.
b
For the mean number of organisms per station, the years 1981-1983
exhibited consistently low numbers (fewer than 1000 per liter), followed
immediately (1984) by the highest peak (...truncated)