Analysis of KRAS, NRAS and BRAF mutational profile by combination of in-tube hybridization and universal tag-microarray in tumor tissue and plasma of colorectal cancer patients
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Analysis of KRAS, NRAS and BRAF mutational
profile by combination of in-tube
hybridization and universal tag-microarray in
tumor tissue and plasma of colorectal cancer
patients
a1111111111
a1111111111
a1111111111
a1111111111
a1111111111
Francesco Damin ID1☯*, Silvia Galbiati2☯, Nadia Soriani2, Valentina Burgio3,
Monica Ronzoni3, Maurizio Ferrari2,4,5, Marcella Chiari1
1 Istituto di Chimica del Riconoscimento Molecolare, CNR, Milano, Italy, 2 Unit of Genomic for the Diagnosis
of Human Pathologies, Division of Genetics and Cell Biology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan,
Italy, 3 Dipartimento di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy, 4 Laboratory of
Clinical Molecular Biology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy, 5 Università Vita-Salute San
Raffaele, Milan, Italy
☯ These authors contributed equally to this work.
*
OPEN ACCESS
Citation: Damin F, Galbiati S, Soriani N, Burgio V,
Ronzoni M, Ferrari M, et al. (2018) Analysis of
KRAS, NRAS and BRAF mutational profile by
combination of in-tube hybridization and universal
tag-microarray in tumor tissue and plasma of
colorectal cancer patients. PLoS ONE 13(12):
e0207876. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.
pone.0207876
Editor: Surinder K. Batra, University of Nebraska
Medical Center, UNITED STATES
Received: July 11, 2018
Accepted: November 6, 2018
Published: December 18, 2018
Copyright: © 2018 Damin et al. This is an open
access article distributed under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License, which
permits unrestricted use, distribution, and
reproduction in any medium, provided the original
author and source are credited.
Data Availability Statement: All relevant data are
within the paper and its Supporting Information
files.
Funding: This project has received funding from
the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and
innovation programme under grant agreement No
766466.
Abstract
Microarray technology fails in detecting point mutations present in a small fraction of cells
from heterogeneous tissue samples or in plasma in a background of wild-type cell-free circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). The aim of this study is to overcome the lack of sensitivity and
specificity of current microarray approaches introducing a rapid and sensitive microarraybased assay for the multiplex detection of minority mutations of oncogenes (KRAS, NRAS
and BRAF) with relevant diagnostics implications in tissue biopsies and plasma samples in
metastatic colorectal cancer patients. In our approach, either wild-type or mutated PCR fragments are hybridized in solution, in a temperature gradient, with a set of reporters with a 5’
domain, complementary to the target sequences and a 3’ domain complementary to a surface immobilized probe. Upon specific hybridization in solution, which occurs specifically
thanks to the temperature gradients, wild-type and mutated samples are captured at specific
location on the surface by hybridization of the 3’ reporter domain with its complementary
immobilized probe sequence. The most common mutations in KRAS, NRAS and BRAF
genes were detected in less than 90 minutes in tissue biopsies and plasma samples of metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Moreover, the method was able to reveal mutant alleles
representing less than 0,3% of total DNA. We demonstrated detection limits superior to
those provided by many current technologies in the detection of RAS and BRAF gene superfamily mutations, a level of sensitivity compatible with the analysis of cell free circulating
tumor DNA in liquid biopsy.
Competing interests: I have read the journal’s
policy and the authors (Francesco Damin, Silvia
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207876 December 18, 2018
1 / 15
Tissue and ctDNA genotyping by combination of in-tube hybridization and universal tag-microarray
Galbiati, Maurizio Ferrari and Marcella Chiari) of
this manuscript have the following competing
interests: they have filed one patent application
(PCT/IB2018/052219 Title: Genotyping of
mutations by combination of in-tube hybridization
and universal tag-microarray) on the method
described in this paper. This does not alter our
adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data
and materials.
Introduction
The identification of DNA variants that can cause diseases is a central aim in human genetics.
In particular, the ability to detect mutations in oncogenes facilitates early diagnosis, monitoring and treatment [1,2] of cancer. The discovery that tumor cells release DNA fragments (circulating tumor DNA -ctDNA-) in blood, urine or other body fluid samples, paves the way to a
paradigm shift in cancer diagnostics introducing the concept of liquid biopsy: a term that
refers to a novel, non-invasive technique used for detecting cancer biomarkers [3,4]. ctDNA
belongs to the pool of the total circulating cell free-DNA in blood. The mechanisms of its
release are not completely disclosed; probably it derives from apoptotic or necrotic cells as well
as from living cells through a mechanism of active secretion. ctDNA provides real-time molecular information allowing monitoring treatment response and relapsing as it contains genetic
alteration of both primary and metastatic lesions, such as point mutations, copy number variations and insertions/deletions [5,6].
Detecting mutation in ctDNA is challenging since the lower number of mutant copies of
cancer origin are masked by the large amount of wild-type DNA mostly from contaminant
leukocytes [7]. Liquid biopsy is still in its infancy and efforts will be required before the field
can mature and achieve widespread routine use in oncology clinical practice. The analysis of
low-abundance mutations requires cfDNA isolation and amplification followed by mutations
detection either in disease specific genes (PCR based sequencing) [8–12] or in multiple genes
simultaneously (next generation sequencing -NGS- multiplex testing) [13]. Droplet digital
PCR (ddPCR) is one of newly developed methods that allow for enumeration of rare mutant
variants. Based on water-emulsion droplet technology, ddPCR fractionates a DNA sample in
20.000 droplets [14]. Mutation-specific amplification of the template subsequently occurs in
each individual droplet, and counting the positive droplets gives precise, absolute target quantification as copies per milliliter of plasma. It was reported that ddPCR can detect mutant
alleles with high sensitivity (0.01–0.001%) [15]. However, with ddPCR only the genes that are
the most susceptible to mutations are analyzed, at first, giving the patient the choice of whether
to pursue additional tests based on the results. The downside of this approach to testing is it is
time and cost consuming.
Another sophisticated ctDNA based cancer test is the targeted amplicon sequencing
[16,17]. NGS in particular conditions, can reach the high sensitivity required for the analysis of
ctDNA. This technique has the potential to uncover additional actionable findings that cou (...truncated)