Effect of Nanoparticles on Electron and Thermoelectric Transport
0
1.Department of Electrical Engineering, University of California
, Santa Cruz,
CA 95064
,
USA
. 2.Department of Physics
,
University of California
, Santa Cruz,
CA 95064
,
USA
. 3.Electrical and Computer Engineering Department
,
University of California
, Santa Barbara,
CA 93106
,
USA
. 4.Materials Department
,
University of California
, Santa Barbara,
CA 93106, USA. 5.
1
Zebarjadi, Esfarjani, Shakouri, Bian, Bahk, Zeng, Bowers, Lu, Zide, and Gossard
Recent experimental results have shown that adding nanoparticles inside a bulk material can enhance the thermoelectric performance by reducing the thermal conductivity and increasing the Seebeck coefficient. In this paper we investigate electron scattering from nanoparticles using different models. We compare the results of the Born approximation to that of the partial-wave method for a single nanoparticle scattering. The partial-wave method is more accurate for particle sizes in the 1 nm to 5 nm range where the point scattering approximation is not valid. The two methods can have different predictions for the thermoelectric properties such as the electrical conductivity and the Seebeck coefficient. To include a random distribution of nanoparticles, we consider an effective medium for the electron scattering using the coherent potential approximation. We compare various theoretical results with the experimental data obtained with ErAs nanoparticles in an InGaAlAs matrix. Reasonably good agreement is found between the measured and theoretical electrical conductivity and Seebeck data in the 300 K to 850 K temperature range.
-
In recent years, along with advancement in
materials synthesis, it has been possible to embed
nanoparticles with controlled size in bulk materials.
Such structures can be used for various applications
such as thermoelectric power generators1 and solar
cells.2 The advantage of incorporating nanoparticles
inside thermoelectric materials is to reduce the
lattice thermal conductivity3 and enhance the Seebeck
coefficient due to electron filtering.4 Adding
nanoparticles also reduces the electrical conductivity.
Therefore the size and the material forming the
nanoparticles should be chosen in such a way that
they scatter phonons more effectively than electrons.
(Received July 8, 2008; accepted December 31, 2008;
published online January 28, 2009)
Scattering of electrons by localized defect
potentials,5 by space-charge regions,6 and by neutral
impurities7 have been widely studied. Busch and
Soukoulis8 investigated the transport of a classical
wave in a random medium composed of dielectric
spheres. They obtained the mean free path of the
transport and the energy transport velocity, which
were in agreement with the experimental results.
Sheng9 calculated the electronic transport in
granular metal films. His theory is extendable to the case of
metallic spherical nanoparticles inside a host matrix.
Kim and Majumdar10 calculated the phonon
scattering cross section of spherical nanoparticles within
the Born approximation, and found an oscillatory
behavior in the scattering cross section, presumably
due to acoustic mismatch. Recently, Faleev and
Leonard11 showed enhancement of the power factor
of semiconductors with metallic nanoinclusions at
high doping concentrations. They have used the
partial-wave technique to calculate the scattering
rates from nanoparticles; however, the results are
based on Eq. 35 in their paper, which is not correct
(see Eq. 6 of this paper). In contrast to their
prediction, we find that there is a big difference between a
well potential and a barrier potential.
In this paper, we consider finite-size
nanoparticles inside a host semiconductor and investigate the
effect of adding nanoparticles on the thermoelectric
transport using three different methods. We use the
Born approximation and the partial-wave technique
to calculate the scattering cross section and
transport properties in the dilute limit (low concentration
of nanoparticles). For higher concentrations we use
the coherent potential approximation (CPA),12,13
which is known as the best single-site
approximation for a disordered system. The predictions of
these models of thermoelectric transport are studied
in this work.
MODEL AND THEORY
Single Nanoparticle Scattering
Here we develop the theory to calculate the
scattering cross section of a single nanoparticle. The
theory is applicable to the case of any arbitrary
spherically symmetric potential.
Born Approximation
The Born approximation is based on the
perturbation theory and therefore has the intrinsic
assumption that the potential of the scatterer is
weak. This approximation works well for energies
which are several times the barrier height. For a
square barrier/well potential, the Born
approximation yields the following results for the differential
scattering cross section (r(h)), the total scattering
cross section (r), and the momentum cross section
(rm), respectively.14
g 2ka sin
rh sin hdh
cos h sin hdh
where, a is the radius of the nanoparticle, V0 is the
barrier/well height, k is the wavevector of the
incident electron, and m* is its effective mass in the host
material. As can be seen from these formulas, the
sign of the potential (barrier or well) does not
matter, and the strength of the nanoparticle potential
(and its size, in the high-energy limit) comes as a
multiplicative factor.
The Partial-Waves Method
The partial-waves method is a way to calculate
the scattering from a spherically symmetric
potential exactly. The details of the method can be found
in standard textbooks.14 The result for the total
cross section is well known. We find for the
momentum cross section the expression shown in
Eq. 6, which is in contrast to the (incorrect) results
of Faleev and Leonard.
rh k12 X1 2l 1eidl sin dlPlcos h 2;
where dl is called the phase shift of the lth partial
wave (l being the angular momentum quantum
number) and / is the wavefunction of the electron
inside the nanoparticle. For a known potential
shape and a given energy, the solution of the
Schrodinger equation can be found numerically (for
example, by the Numerov method) inside the
nanoparticle. Then yl is calculated by matching the
slope of the wavefunction at the boundary between
the nanoparticle and the host material. We use the
shooting method to find the wavefunction within the
cutoff radius of the nanoparticle. The solution is
exact and can be applied to any arbitrary
spherically symmetric potential of finite range.
Scattering from a Random Medium
In the dilute limit, when the nanoparticles are
far apart, each nanoparticle can be treated
independently; however, when the concentration of
nanoparticles increases, this approximation ceases
to be valid. We need to add the effect of the
nanoparticles volume, meaning that the electron wave
sees a random medium instead of individual
scatterers. One approach to solve such a problem is to use
an effective medium theory. Instead of a random
potential due to na (...truncated)