Distribution of clinical isolates of Candida spp. and antifungal susceptibility of high biofilm-forming Candida isolates
Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 51(5):644-650, Sep-Oct, 2018
doi: 10.1590/0037-8682-0136-2018
Major Article
Distribution of clinical isolates of Candida spp. and
antifungal susceptibility of high
biofilm-forming Candida isolates
Gulcan Sahal[1] and Isil Seyis Bilkay[1]
[1]. Biotechnology Section, Department of Biology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Abstract
Introduction: The increase in the incidence of fungal infections, especially those caused by Candida albicans and other Candida
species, necessitates the understanding and treatment of Candida-associated infections. In this study, we aimed to investigate
the identification, distribution, and biofilm formation ability of different clinical Candida isolates and evaluate the distribution
and antifungal susceptibilities of high biofilm-forming (HBF) Candida isolates. Methods: For identification, carbohydrate
fermentation, carbohydrate assimilation, and ChromAgar tests were used. Biofilm formation was assessed using crystal violet
binding assay, while the susceptibility to antifungal agents was determined using ATBTM Fungus 3 test kits. Results: The majority
of Candida species were C. parapsilosis (31.3%; 31/99) and C. tropicalis (30.3%; 30/99). C. tropicalis was found to be the most
frequently isolated species among all HBF Candida species. HBF Candida isolates were more frequently isolated from vaginal
swab (35.7%; 10/28), tracheal aspirate (17.9%; 5/28), and urine (17.9%; 5/28). The majority of tested isolates were resistant to
itraconazole and voriconazole, whereas no isolate was deemed resistant to 5-flucytosine. Conclusions: C. tropicalis displays the
highest biofilm formation ability among all the Candida species evaluated, and HBF Candida isolates were more frequently seen
in vaginal swab, tracheal aspirate, and urine samples. Our findings revealed that 5-flucytosine is the most efficient antifungal
agent against HBF Candida isolates.
Keywords: Antifungal resistance. Biofilm formation. Candida albicans. Non-Candida albicans.
Candida Species. 5-Flucytosine
INTRODUCTION
Candida species are natural colonizers of gastrointestinal
and urogenital tracts and known to reside as commensals in
the oral and conjunctival flora of the healthy human body1.
These organisms are known as opportunistic pathogens that
may cause various infections ranging from oral candidiasis
and esophagitis to hospital-acquired blood stream infections2-4.
Although Candida albicans has been reported as the most
predominant Candida species that frequently causes invasive
fungal infections, a significant increase in non-C. albicans
Candida (NCAC) species such as Candida glabrata, Candida
krusei, Candida tropicalis, and Candida parapsilosis in human
candidiasis has also been indicated over the last decade2,4,5.
The increase in the occurrences of all NCAC species as
pathogens has led to improvements in diagnostic methods that
can sensitively differentiate between NCAC and C. albicans5.
Corresponding author: Dr. Gulcan Sahal.
e-mail:
Received 22 April 2018
Accepted 7 August 2018
644
On the other hand, the widespread use of a broad range of
medical implant devices and an increase in patients that receive
immunosuppressive therapy have led to the colonization of
different Candida species and various Candida infections2,6.
Biofilm formation is one of the most important reasons involved
in the transformation of Candida species into important
human pathogens6. Biofilm formation is responsible for many
problems, as it avoids penetration and diffusion of various
antimicrobial agents, causes generation of biofilm cells that
have physiological and metabolic alterations, and provides a
suitable environment for horizontal gene transfer mechanisms,
which play an important role in antimicrobial resistance7,8. As
biofilm environments are suitable for the acquisition of new
traits via horizontal gene transfer9, investigation of the antifungal
resistance of Candida isolates with biofilm formation ability
and determination of effective antifungal agents against these
isolates are necessary to prevent biofilm-associated Candida
infections. In this study, we aimed to identify different clinical
Candida isolates, determine their biofilm formation ability, and
investigate the susceptibility of high biofilm-forming (HBF)
Candida isolates to antifungal agents.
Sahal G and Bilkay IS - Candida distribution and susceptibility
agar medium (Difco™). The sterile carbohydrate discs were
placed onto the agar plates and the plates were incubated at
37°C for 48h. Assimilation of any carbohydrate was considered
as positive with a presence of a growth zone around the
carbohydrate disc. A total of 99 Candida isolates were identified
according to their positive/negative carbohydrate assimilation
test results, as presented in Table 14,11-15.
METHODS
Microorganisms
We evaluated 99 clinical Candida isolates that were
randomly collected from patients treated at two different
hospitals in Ankara, Turkey, between July 2005 and March
2014. Collected isolates were inoculated into the brain heart
infusion (BHI) broth (Lab M Ltd, Lancashire, UK) media
supplemented with 10% glycerol and stored at -20°C for use in
further experiments.
Growths on chromagar media
Each Candida isolate was inoculated into CHROMagar™
Candida medium; (CAC, Becton Dickinson, Heidelberg,
Germany), which is designed to identify different Candida
species based on their colony colors and morphologies. All
plates were incubated at 37°C for 48h and visually observed
after incubation. A total of 99 Candida isolates were identified
according to their colony morphologies on CHROMAgar™
Candida medium. In CHROMAgar™ Candida medium, smooth
colonies that appear light to medium green were considered as
C. albicans; while dark blue to metallic blue smooth colonies
were considered as C. tropicalis. Pink colonies with a whitish
rough border were deemed as C. krusei, whereas pink-lavender
smooth colonies were considered as C. glabrata. In addition,
pink-salmon smooth colonies were deemed as Candida kefyr,
while white-pale pink smooth colonies were considered as C.
parapsilosis4,11,15.
Identification tests
Colony morphologies and microscopic images of collected
isolates were examined. By visual inspections, cells and colonies
suspected to be Candida were subjected to carbohydrate
fermentation, carbohydrate assimilation, and ChromAgar tests.
Carbohydrate fermentation tests
Carbohydrate fermentation tests were performed as per
the method described by Bhavan10, with some modifications.
Briefly, nutrient broth media supplemented with 1% (v/v)
bromothymol blue as a pH indicator and carbohydrates such as
glucose, galactose, lactose, maltose, and sucrose were separately
prepared. A total of 10μL of each Candida isolate suspended
in McFarland 0.5 standard in 5mL of saline buffer was added
into 96 wells containing 100μL of different carbohydrate media.
The plates were incubated at 37°C for 48h. Fermentation of any
carbohydrate was considere (...truncated)