Effect of Switchgrass Ecotype and Cultivar on Establishment, Feeding, and Development of Fall Armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)
Plant Resistance
Journal of Economic Entomology, 112(1), 2019, 440–449
doi: 10.1093/jee/toy292
Advance Access Publication Date: 22 October 2018
Research
Effect of Switchgrass Ecotype and Cultivar on
Establishment, Feeding, and Development of Fall
Armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)
Marissa K. Schuh,1,2,5 Christie A. Bahlai,3 Carolyn M. Malmstrom,4 and
Douglas A. Landis1
Subject Editor: John Trumble
Received 13 June 2018; Editorial decision 31 August 2018
Abstract
As interest in production of second-generation biofuels increases, dedicated biomass crops are likely to be called
upon to help meet feedstock demands. Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) is a North American native perennial
grass that as a candidate biomass crop, combines high biomass yields with other desirable ecosystem services. At
present, switchgrass is produced on limited acres in the United States and experiences relatively minor insect pest
problems. However, as switchgrass undergoes breeding to increase biomass yield and quality, and is grown on
more acres, insect pest pressure will probably increase.To investigate how currently available switchgrass ecotypes
and cultivars may influence herbivory by generalist insect herbivores, we performed feeding trials using neonate
and late-instar fall armyworm [Spodoptera frugiperda JE Smith (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)]. No-choice feeding
experiments were used to explore how switchgrass varieties influence larval establishment, consumption levels,
and life-history traits in contrast to a preferred host, corn (Zea mays L.). Neonate S. frugiperda consumed greater
amounts of corn than switchgrass and increased amounts of upland versus lowland ecotypes. Late-instar larvae,
which do the majority of the larval feeding, exhibited lower consumption of lowland ecotypes, which led to increased
development time and reduced pupal weights. The exception to these trends was the upland cultivar ‘Trailblazer’,
which unexpectedly performed similarly to lowland cultivars. These results suggest that both switchgrass ecotype
and cultivar can influence feeding damage by a common generalist herbivore. These findings can be used to help
inform current switchgrass planting decisions as well as future breeding efforts.
Key words: bioenergy cropping systems, switchgrass herbivory, plant breeding
Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) is a perennial C4 grass native to
much of the central and eastern United States (Casler 2012). An ecologically important prairie plant, switchgrass has also been bred for
forage production and, more recently, as a model bioenergy feedstock (Wright et al. 1993). Switchgrass has several advantages as
a biomass crop including its large native range (Parrish and Fike
2005), effective use of nutrients (McLaughlin and Walsh 1998),
and high biomass yields, even on marginal lands (Fike et al. 2006,
Schmer et al. 2008). Another benefit is that switchgrass is generally
resistant to insect herbivory, although when planted as monocultures
grasses may become more susceptible to pest outbreaks (Tscharntke
and Greiler 1995). Indeed, as more switchgrass has been planted as
part of breeding efforts in the United States, several insect pests of
switchgrass have been identified (Prasifka et al. 2010; Calles Torrez
et al. 2013, 2014). Moreover, as high-yielding cultivars of switchgrass are developed, selection for increased growth rate may lead to
reduced plant defenses (Herms and Mattson 1992). Insects that feed
on switchgrass and may emerge as pests include thrips (Thysanura;
Gottwald and Adam 1998), grasshoppers (Orthoptera; Casler et al.
2004), aphids (Aphididae; Bradshaw et al. 2010, Schrotenboer et al.
2011, Burd et al. 2012), leafhoppers (Cicadellidae; Holguin et al.
2010), and lepidopteran (Lepidoptera) larvae (Prasifka et al. 2009,
2011b; Calles Torrez et al. 2013).
An important factor in switchgrass breeding is consideration of
parental ecotype, a term used to differentiate between forms in a
species adapted to different environmental conditions (Gregor 1944,
© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America.
All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: .
440
1
Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, 578 Wilson Road, Room 204, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA, 2Current address:
Michigan State University Extension, 1040 South Winter Street, Suite 2020, Adrian, MI 49221, USA, 3Department of Biological
Sciences, Kent State University, 1275 University Esplanade, Room 209, Kent, OH 44243, USA, 4Department of Plant Biology and
Graduate Program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology, and Behavior, Michigan State University, 612 Wilson Road, Room 166, East
Lansing, MI 48824, USA, and 5Corresponding author, e-mail:
Journal of Economic Entomology, 2019, Vol. 112, No. 1
441
well known. Prasifka et al. (2009) showed that fall armyworm survived through pupation on switchgrass at rates similar to that of
Bermuda grass, a host on which fall armyworm is a known economic
pest (Leuck et al. 1968, Prasifka et al. 2009). Dowd and Johnson
(2009) showed that across six upland cultivars, neonate fall armyworm mortality during initial establishment was minimal; however,
subsequent leaf consumption varied significantly by cultivar.
Here, we use fall armyworm as a model to investigate how differences among switchgrass cultivars may influence the survival,
feeding patterns, and development of a generalist insect herbivore.
We compared rates of neonate establishment and herbivory on corn
(Zea mays L.), a known host plant for fall armyworm, versus 16
switchgrass cultivars representing a range of ecotypes and breeding
histories. We further compared developmental rates and survival of
late-instar fall armyworm on a subset of eight switchgrass cultivars.
Based on ecotype differences in leaf traits, we hypothesized that
southern lowland switchgrass, which have tougher, more structurally defended leaves, would be less favorable hosts for fall armyworm than northern upland cultivars/populations. Specifically, we
predicted that on southern lowland switchgrass fall armyworm
would consume less leaf area, develop more slowly, and experience
greater mortality.
Materials and Methods
Plants
Switchgrass cultivars for all tests were established from seed and
transplanted into the field in spring of 2014 (Table 1). Seeds were
cold stratified in distilled water at 4°C and germinated in plug trays
(X-72PS, Landmark Plastic Corp, Akron, OH) under high light conditions (16:8 [L:D] day length) in a plant growth chamber at 26°C
for 2 wk. Trays were then moved to a greenhouse until seedlings
were approximately 0.3 m tall and then acclimated to outdoor conditions in an outdoor courtyard for 1 wk. In mid-June 2014, plants
were transplanted to a field (alfisol soil, Marlette sandy loam) at the
Michigan State Entomology Farm (East Lansing, MI). The experiment was established as a randomized complete block design with
each cultivar represented by two pla (...truncated)