Trends in the use of electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation: influence of major trials and guidelines on clinical practice
Alegret et al. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders 2012, 12:42
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2261/12/42
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Open Access
Trends in the use of electrical cardioversion for
atrial fibrillation: influence of major trials and
guidelines on clinical practice
Josep M Alegret1*, Xavier Viñolas2, César Romero-Menor3, Silvia Pons4, Roger Villuendas5, Naiara Calvo6,
Jordi Pérez-Rodon7, Xavier Sabaté8 and REVERCAT study investigators
Abstract
Background: The purpose of the present study was to assess the trends in the use of ECV following published
studies that had compared rhythm and rate control strategies on atrial fibrillation (AF), and the recommendations
included in the current clinical practice guidelines.
Methods: The REVERCAT is a population-based assessment of the use of electrical cardioversion (ECV) in treating
persistent AF in Catalonia (Spain). The initial survey was conducted in 2003 and the follow-up in 2010.
Results: We observed a decrease of 9% in the absolute numbers of ECV performed (436 in 2003 vs. 397 in 2010).
This is equivalent to 27% when considering population increases over this period. The patients treated with ECV in
2010 were younger, had a lower prevalence of previous embolism, a higher prevalence of diabetes, and increased
body weight. Underlying heart disease factors indicated, in 2010, a higher proportion of NYHA ≥ II and left
ventricular ejection fraction <30%. We observed a reduction in the number of ECV performed in 16 of the 27 (67%)
participating hospitals. However, there was an increase of 14% in the number of procedures performed in tertiary
hospitals, and was related to the increasing use of ECV as a bridge to AF ablation. Considering the initial number of
patients treated with ECV, the rate of sinus rhythm at 3 months was almost unchanged (58% in 2003 vs. 57% in
2010; p = 0.9) despite the greater use of biphasic energy in 2010 and a similar prescription of anti-arrhythmic drugs.
Conclusions: Although we observed a decrease in the number of ECVs performed over the 7 year period between
the two studies, this technique remains a common option for treating patients with persistent AF. The change in
the characteristics of candidate patients did not translate into better outcomes.
Keywords: Atrial fibrillation, Electrical cardioversion, Rhythm control, Rate control, Follow-up
Background
The REVERCAT study (REgistre sobre la cardioVERSió
elèctrica a CATalunya; Registry of Electrical Cardioversion in Catalonia) is a multi-center study involving 27
participating hospitals. The recording of characteristics
of electrical cardioversion (ECV) was intended to evaluate the use of the technique in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) in current clinical practice in Catalonia
(Spain). The initial study was conducted at the start of
* Correspondence:
1
Secció de Cardiologia, Hospital Universitari de Sant Joan, Institut
d’Investigacions Sanitàries Pere Virgili, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, C/Dr.
Laporte, s/n, Reus 43205, Spain
Full list of author information is available at the end of the article
2003. The current re-evaluation was conducted early in
2010 and, over these past 7 years, there have been a few
studies published, and subsequent guidelines generated,
which described the lack of a clear benefit of rhythm control vs. rate control strategies in patients with AF [1-3].
The purpose of the present study was to compare the frequency and characteristics of patients treated with ECV
between the years 2003 and 2010; the objective being to
assess the impact of major clinical trials and recommendations included in the current clinical practice guidelines.
Methods
The REVERCAT study was set-up to record, prospectively, all patients with persistent AF who were
© 2012 Alegret et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and
reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Alegret et al. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders 2012, 12:42
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2261/12/42
considered candidates for ECV. There were 27 participating hospitals which are representative of the whole of
Catalonia (an Autonomous Community in NE Spain)
(Table 1).
The area of Catalonia is 31,930 km2 and the population was 6,506,000 inhabitants in 2003 and 7,512,000
inhabitants in 2010, all of whom have the right to
health-care provision under the publicly-funded
National Health Service. The hospitals participating in
the present study attend to approximately 90% of this
population. The initial registry was set-up between 1st
February and 30th October 2003. The present study was
conducted between 1st February and 30th October 2010,
the purpose being to assess the changes in the use of
ECV in clinical practice in Catalonia. The patients
included in the study to have ECV applied were all those
who met the criteria of being ≥18 years of age, with AF
Table 1 List of investigators and centers participating in
the REVERCAT study
Clinical Investigatora
Affiliation
X Sabaté
H.U. de Bellvitge, Hospitalet de Llobregat
R Serrat
H del Mar
A Sualís
H de Mataró
F Planas
H. de Badalona
G Vazquez
H. Comarcal de la Selva, Blanes
J Escudero
H Mútua de Terrassa
X Abardia/C Barberà
Clínica Ponent, Lleida
L Guillamon
H. Parc Taulí, Sabadell
L Mont/N Calvo
H. Clínic, Barcelona
J Sadurní
H. General de Vic
S Pons
H de Barcelona
A Descalzi
H. Comarcal Alt Penedés, Vilafranca del Penedés
N Batalla
H. Sagrat Cor, Barcelona
E Sanz/S Serrano
H.U. Joan XXIII, Tarragona
J Pérez-Rodon
H.G.U. Vall d’ Hebrón, Barcelona
E Rodríguez-Font
H. Sta Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona
F Freire
H. de Palamós, Palamós
M Vilaseca
H de Calella, Calella
C Romero
H. Sant Boi de Llobregat
I Duran
H.U. Sant Joan de Reus
J Tomàs
H.U. Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida
I Lechuga
H. Verge de la Cinta, Tortosa
R Villuendas
H. Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona
A Jaber
H. de Terrassa
I Romeo
H. d’Igualada
R Canals
H. Comarcal de Mollet
M Paz
H de Figueras
a
Collaborators in Pubmed.
Page 2 of 6
duration >7 days, and with no precipitating conditions
including hyperthyroidism, fever, cardiac surgery and
pericarditis. Successful ECV was considered when sinus
rhythm (SR) was achieved, and excluded patients with
immediate relapse. A clinical and ECG follow-up was
performed at 3 months post-ECV. Patients were considered to have maintained SR at 3 months if there had not
been a relapse of persistent AF and, as well, the ECG at
3 months of follow-up showed SR. The information
recorded included clinical data, treatment, echocardiography data, and procedure variables. We compared all
these variables in the two surveys conducted 7 years
apart. The principal investigator in each hospital was the
same in both surveys in 21 of the 27 participating
hospitals.
The study received approval (...truncated)