Erratum to: The effect of a pedometer-based community walking intervention "Walking for Wellbeing in the West

International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, May 2010

Graham Baker, Stuart R Gray, Annemarie Wright, Claire Fitzsimons, Myra Nimmo, Ruth Lowry, Nanette Mutrie

Article PDF cannot be displayed. You can download it here:

https://ijbnpa.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/1479-5868-7-51

Erratum to: The effect of a pedometer-based community walking intervention "Walking for Wellbeing in the West

Baker et al. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 2010, 7:51 http://www.ijbnpa.org/content/7/1/51 Open Access CORRECTION The effect of a pedometer-based community walking intervention "Walking for Wellbeing in the West" on physical activity levels and health outcomes: a 12-week randomized controlled trial Correction Graham Baker*, Stuart R Gray, Annemarie Wright, Claire Fitzsimons, Myra Nimmo, Ruth Lowry, Nanette Mutrie for the Scottish Physical Activity Research Collaboration (SPARColl) Correction Since publication of our article[1] we have found some imputation errors in the main text and Table Four (Table 1) and Table Five (Table 2) corresponding to the 12-week results. The corrections are as follows: In the results section of the manuscript the median differences presented in the text for the Wilcoxon's signedrank tests in the intervention group should be, 1. Leisure minutes walked: "60" not "100" 2. Weekday sitting: "- 300" not "1200" 3. Weekend sitting: "- 120" not "360" 4. Total sitting: "- 300" not "1680" In the results section of the manuscript the median difference presented for the Mann Whitney U test at week 12 between groups should be, 1. Total minutes walked: "135" not "57.5" As a consequence of the amendment to the median leisure minutes walked in the intervention group the following sentence from the discussion should be corrected as follows: Original Sentence "The increase observed in the step-count data was supported by the self-reported results of the IPAQ; a significant increase in reported minutes of leisure time walking was found in the intervention group (median increase of 100 minutes per/week)." Amended Sentence "The increase observed in the step-count data was supported by the self-reported results of the IPAQ; a significant increase in reported minutes of leisure time walking was found in the intervention group (median increase of 60 minutes per/week)." Author Details Medical Research Council Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, 4 Lilybank Gardens, Glasgow, G12 8RZ, Scotland Received: 26 May 2010 Accepted: 27 May 2010 Published: 27 May 2010 © This International 2010 article is an Baker Open is Journal available etAccess al; licensee offrom: article Behavioral BioMed http://www.ijbnpa.org/content/7/1/51 distributed Nutrition Central under and Ltd.Physical the terms Activity of the2010, Creative 7:51Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. References 1. Baker G, Gray SR, Wright A, Fitzsimons C, Nimmo M, Lowry R, Mutrie N: The effect of a pedometer-based community walking intervention "Walking for Wellbeing in the West" on physical activity levels and health outcomes: a 12-week randomized controlled trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2008, 5:44. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-7-51 Cite this article as: Baker et al., The effect of a pedometer-based community walking intervention "Walking for Wellbeing in the West" on physical activity levels and health outcomes: a 12-week randomized controlled trial International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 2010, 7:51 * Correspondence: 1 Medical Research Council Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, 4 Lilybank Gardens, Glasgow, G12 8RZ, Scotland Full list of author information is available at the end of the article © 2010 Baker et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Baker et al. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 2010, 7:51 http://www.ijbnpa.org/content/7/1/51 Page 2 of 3 Table 1: Descriptive statistics for age, pedometer step-counts and health related outcomes at baseline and week 12 for intervention and control group. Intervention Group (n = 39) Control Group (n = 40) Baseline Week 12 Baseline Week 12 Age (years) 47.3 (9.3) a 51.2 (7.9) a Steps/day 6802 (3212) 9977 (4669) 6924 (3201) 7078 (2911) PANAS positive 31.2 (6.7) 33.5 (7.4) 31.7 (6.9) 31.3 (7.6) PANAS negative 20.1 (7.2) 19.1 (6.9) 20.2 (8.1) 18.8 (7.5) EQ-5D tariff 0.88 (0.12) 0.89 (0.11) 0.87 (0.12) 0.89 (0.12) EQ VAS 65.4 (18.3) 69.5 (17.8) 69.8 (19.7) 70.7 (18.6) Height (m)b 1.66 (0.08) a 1.64 (0.08) a Body Mass (kg)b 78.9 (15.6) 79.1 (15.2) 79.5 (18.1) 79.5 (17.8) BMI (kg/m2)b 28.5 (4.8) 28.6 (4.8) 29.4 (6.3) 29.5 (6.2) Waist circumference (cm)b 89.5 (12.6) 89.8 (12.7) 90.4 (14.6) 90.9 (15.6) Hip circumference (cm)b 108.9 (8.8) 108.5 (9.7) 110.1 (12.4) 110.2 (11.8) Waist:Hip Ratiob 0.82 (0.08) 0.83 (0.08) 0.82 (0.09) 0.82 (0.09) % body fatb 30.7 (4.4) 31.2 (4.9) 31.8 (5.6) 32.5 (6.3) Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg)b 118.2 (17.9) 119.2 (17.0) 119.9 (15.9) 121.4 (15.1) Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg)b 75.1 (11.4) 76.3 (12.2) 75.5 (11.8) 78.2 (11.8) Heart Rate (beats.min-1)c 68.6 (7.2) 69.5 (8.3) 67.9 (8.6) 68.9 (9.0) Total Cholesterol (mmol.l-1)c 5.4 (1.3) 5.4 (1.2) 5.5 (1.1) 5.5 (1.0) HDL (mmol-1)c 1.3 (0.3) 1.3 (0.3) 1.4 (0.4) 1.4 (0.4) Chol:HDL Ratioc 4.2 (1.1) 4.2 (1.1) 4.1 (1.2) 4.1 (1.3) Values are mean (M) and standard deviation (SD). a not measured at week 12 b anthropometric measures: (n = 37) for intervention group, (n = 39) for control group c blood measures: (n = 32) for intervention group, (n = 34) for control group Note: there were no significant differences between the intervention and control group for any variable at baseline Baker et al. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 2010, 7:51 http://www.ijbnpa.org/content/7/1/51 Page 3 of 3 Table 2: Descriptive statistics for IPAQ variables at baseline and week 12. Intervention Group (n = 39) Control Group (n = 40) Baseline Week 12 Baseline Week 12 Vigorous PA 0 (1080) 0 (1800) 0 (720) 0 (540) Moderate PA 0 (1500) 0 (900) 0 (1500) 0 (600) Walking 0 (1620) 0 (2520) 0 (1350) 0 (1650) Total 0 (3000) 30 (4680) 0 (2550) 0 (2730) Work-related PA Transportation PA Bicycling 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (40) 0 (40) Walking 105 (1680) 140 (900) 80 (1680) 70 (1680) Total 105 (1680) 140 (900) 80 (1720) 70 (1720) 0 (840) 0 (840) 0 (750) 0 (360) Housework PA Vigorous outside home Moderate outside home 0 (2100) 0 (1680) 0 (1260) 0 (840) Moderate inside home 210 (2100) 150 (840) 180 (1680) 120 (1680) Total 360 (4200) 300 (2520) 255 (2640) 202.5 (2520) 40 (840) 100 (840) 35 (600) 16.25 (840) Vigorous PA 0 (180) 0 (120) 0 (120) 0 (600) Moderate PA 0 (360) 0 (60) 0 (180) 0 (180) Total 60 (840) 120 (840) 60 (600) 60 (840) Total Walking 225 (3360) 290 (2850) 167.5 (1740) 155 (1925) Total Mo (...truncated)


This is a preview of a remote PDF: https://ijbnpa.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/1479-5868-7-51
Article home page: https://ijbnpa.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1479-5868-7-51

Graham Baker, Stuart R Gray, Annemarie Wright, Claire Fitzsimons, Myra Nimmo, Ruth Lowry, Nanette Mutrie. Erratum to: The effect of a pedometer-based community walking intervention "Walking for Wellbeing in the West, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2010, pp. 51, Volume 7, Issue 1, DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-7-51