Erratum to: The effect of a pedometer-based community walking intervention "Walking for Wellbeing in the West
Baker et al. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 2010, 7:51
http://www.ijbnpa.org/content/7/1/51
Open Access
CORRECTION
The effect of a pedometer-based community
walking intervention "Walking for Wellbeing in the
West" on physical activity levels and health
outcomes: a 12-week randomized controlled trial
Correction
Graham Baker*, Stuart R Gray, Annemarie Wright, Claire Fitzsimons, Myra Nimmo, Ruth Lowry, Nanette Mutrie for the
Scottish Physical Activity Research Collaboration (SPARColl)
Correction
Since publication of our article[1] we have found some
imputation errors in the main text and Table Four (Table
1) and Table Five (Table 2) corresponding to the 12-week
results. The corrections are as follows:
In the results section of the manuscript the median differences presented in the text for the Wilcoxon's signedrank tests in the intervention group should be,
1. Leisure minutes walked: "60" not "100"
2. Weekday sitting: "- 300" not "1200"
3. Weekend sitting: "- 120" not "360"
4. Total sitting: "- 300" not "1680"
In the results section of the manuscript the median difference presented for the Mann Whitney U test at week
12 between groups should be,
1. Total minutes walked: "135" not "57.5"
As a consequence of the amendment to the median leisure minutes walked in the intervention group the following sentence from the discussion should be corrected as
follows:
Original Sentence
"The increase observed in the step-count data was supported by the self-reported results of the IPAQ; a significant increase in reported minutes of leisure time walking
was found in the intervention group (median increase of
100 minutes per/week)."
Amended Sentence
"The increase observed in the step-count data was supported by the self-reported results of the IPAQ; a significant increase in reported minutes of leisure time walking
was found in the intervention group (median increase of
60 minutes per/week)."
Author Details
Medical Research Council Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, 4 Lilybank
Gardens, Glasgow, G12 8RZ, Scotland
Received: 26 May 2010 Accepted: 27 May 2010
Published: 27 May 2010
©
This
International
2010
article
is an
Baker
Open
is Journal
available
etAccess
al; licensee
offrom:
article
Behavioral
BioMed
http://www.ijbnpa.org/content/7/1/51
distributed
Nutrition
Central
under
and
Ltd.Physical
the terms
Activity
of the2010,
Creative
7:51Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
References
1. Baker G, Gray SR, Wright A, Fitzsimons C, Nimmo M, Lowry R, Mutrie N: The
effect of a pedometer-based community walking intervention
"Walking for Wellbeing in the West" on physical activity levels and
health outcomes: a 12-week randomized controlled trial. Int J Behav
Nutr Phys Act 2008, 5:44.
doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-7-51
Cite this article as: Baker et al., The effect of a pedometer-based community
walking intervention "Walking for Wellbeing in the West" on physical activity
levels and health outcomes: a 12-week randomized controlled trial International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 2010, 7:51
* Correspondence:
1 Medical Research Council Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, 4 Lilybank
Gardens, Glasgow, G12 8RZ, Scotland
Full list of author information is available at the end of the article
© 2010 Baker et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons
Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in
any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Baker et al. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 2010, 7:51
http://www.ijbnpa.org/content/7/1/51
Page 2 of 3
Table 1: Descriptive statistics for age, pedometer step-counts and health related outcomes at baseline and week 12 for
intervention and control group.
Intervention Group (n = 39)
Control Group (n = 40)
Baseline
Week 12
Baseline
Week 12
Age (years)
47.3 (9.3)
a
51.2 (7.9)
a
Steps/day
6802 (3212)
9977 (4669)
6924 (3201)
7078 (2911)
PANAS positive
31.2 (6.7)
33.5 (7.4)
31.7 (6.9)
31.3 (7.6)
PANAS negative
20.1 (7.2)
19.1 (6.9)
20.2 (8.1)
18.8 (7.5)
EQ-5D tariff
0.88 (0.12)
0.89 (0.11)
0.87 (0.12)
0.89 (0.12)
EQ VAS
65.4 (18.3)
69.5 (17.8)
69.8 (19.7)
70.7 (18.6)
Height (m)b
1.66 (0.08)
a
1.64 (0.08)
a
Body Mass (kg)b
78.9 (15.6)
79.1 (15.2)
79.5 (18.1)
79.5 (17.8)
BMI (kg/m2)b
28.5 (4.8)
28.6 (4.8)
29.4 (6.3)
29.5 (6.2)
Waist circumference (cm)b
89.5 (12.6)
89.8 (12.7)
90.4 (14.6)
90.9 (15.6)
Hip circumference (cm)b
108.9 (8.8)
108.5 (9.7)
110.1 (12.4)
110.2 (11.8)
Waist:Hip Ratiob
0.82 (0.08)
0.83 (0.08)
0.82 (0.09)
0.82 (0.09)
% body fatb
30.7 (4.4)
31.2 (4.9)
31.8 (5.6)
32.5 (6.3)
Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg)b
118.2 (17.9)
119.2 (17.0)
119.9 (15.9)
121.4 (15.1)
Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg)b
75.1 (11.4)
76.3 (12.2)
75.5 (11.8)
78.2 (11.8)
Heart Rate (beats.min-1)c
68.6 (7.2)
69.5 (8.3)
67.9 (8.6)
68.9 (9.0)
Total Cholesterol (mmol.l-1)c
5.4 (1.3)
5.4 (1.2)
5.5 (1.1)
5.5 (1.0)
HDL (mmol-1)c
1.3 (0.3)
1.3 (0.3)
1.4 (0.4)
1.4 (0.4)
Chol:HDL Ratioc
4.2 (1.1)
4.2 (1.1)
4.1 (1.2)
4.1 (1.3)
Values are mean (M) and standard deviation (SD).
a not measured at week 12
b anthropometric measures: (n = 37) for intervention group, (n = 39) for control group
c blood measures: (n = 32) for intervention group, (n = 34) for control group
Note: there were no significant differences between the intervention and control group for any variable at baseline
Baker et al. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 2010, 7:51
http://www.ijbnpa.org/content/7/1/51
Page 3 of 3
Table 2: Descriptive statistics for IPAQ variables at baseline and week 12.
Intervention Group (n = 39)
Control Group (n = 40)
Baseline
Week 12
Baseline
Week 12
Vigorous PA
0 (1080)
0 (1800)
0 (720)
0 (540)
Moderate PA
0 (1500)
0 (900)
0 (1500)
0 (600)
Walking
0 (1620)
0 (2520)
0 (1350)
0 (1650)
Total
0 (3000)
30 (4680)
0 (2550)
0 (2730)
Work-related PA
Transportation PA
Bicycling
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (40)
0 (40)
Walking
105 (1680)
140 (900)
80 (1680)
70 (1680)
Total
105 (1680)
140 (900)
80 (1720)
70 (1720)
0 (840)
0 (840)
0 (750)
0 (360)
Housework PA
Vigorous outside home
Moderate outside home
0 (2100)
0 (1680)
0 (1260)
0 (840)
Moderate inside home
210 (2100)
150 (840)
180 (1680)
120 (1680)
Total
360 (4200)
300 (2520)
255 (2640)
202.5 (2520)
40 (840)
100 (840)
35 (600)
16.25 (840)
Vigorous PA
0 (180)
0 (120)
0 (120)
0 (600)
Moderate PA
0 (360)
0 (60)
0 (180)
0 (180)
Total
60 (840)
120 (840)
60 (600)
60 (840)
Total Walking
225 (3360)
290 (2850)
167.5 (1740)
155 (1925)
Total Mo (...truncated)