Deoxyinosine repair in nuclear extracts of human cells
Lee et al. Cell Biosci (2015) 5:52
DOI 10.1186/s13578-015-0044-8
Open Access
RESEARCH
Deoxyinosine repair in nuclear extracts
of human cells
Chia‑Chia Lee1, Ya‑Chien Yang1,2, Steven D. Goodman3, Shi Chen1, Teng‑Yung Huang1, Wern‑Cherng Cheng2,
Liang‑In Lin1,2 and Woei‑horng Fang1,2*
Abstract
Background: Deamination of adenine can occur spontaneously under physiological conditions generating the
highly mutagenic lesion, hypoxanthine. This process is enhanced by ROS from exposure of DNA to ionizing radia‑
tion, UV light, nitrous acid, or heat. Hypoxanthine in DNA can pair with cytosine which results in A:T to G:C transition
mutations after DNA replication. In Escherichia coli, deoxyinosine (hypoxanthine deoxyribonucleotide, dI) is removed
through an alternative excision repair pathway initiated by endonuclease V. However, the correction of dI in mamma‑
lian cells appears more complex and was not fully understood.
Results: All four possible dI-containing heteroduplex DNAs, including A-I, C-I, G-I, and T-I were introduced to repair
reactions containing extracts from human cells. The repair reaction requires magnesium, dNTPs, and ATP as cofac‑
tors. We found G-I was the best substrate followed by T-I, A-I and C-I, respectively. Moreover, judging from the repair
requirements and sensitivity to specific polymerase inhibitors, there were overlapping repair activities in processing
of dI in DNA. Indeed, a hereditable non-polyposis colorectal cancer cell line (HCT116) demonstrated lower dI repair
activity that was partially attributed to lack of mismatch repair.
Conclusions: A plasmid-based convenient and non-radioisotopic method was created to study dI repair in human
cells. Mutagenic dI lesions processed in vitro can be scored by restriction enzyme cleavage to evaluate the repair.
The repair assay described in this study provides a good platform for further investigation of human repair pathways
involved in dI processing and their biological significance in mutation prevention.
Keywords: Deoxyinosine repair, Mismatch repair, Human cell extracts, In vitro assay, DNA repair deficiency
Background
Deoxyinosine (hypoxanthine deoxyribonucleotide, dI) in
DNA can arise from spontaneous deamination of deoxyadenosine residue, and is also induced by ROS produced
from normal aerobic respiration. In addition, exposure
of DNA to ionizing radiation, UV light, nitrous acid, or
heat can promote the formation of dI [1, 2]. Alternatively,
dI can be introduced by misincorporation of dITP in the
nucleotide pool during replication [3, 4]. Deoxyinosine
derived from deamination of deoxyadenosine in DNA is
potentially mutagenic since it prefers to pair with dCTP
*Correspondence:
1
Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences and Medical Biotechnology,
College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, #7, Chung‑Shan South
Road, Taipei 10002, Taiwan, ROC
Full list of author information is available at the end of the article
during replication, yielding A:T to G:C transition mutations at sites of adenine deamination [5].
In mammalian cells, base excision repair (BER) was
thought to be the major pathway for dI repair. The excision of base damage is initiated by a specific DNA glycosylase: Hypoxanthine is bound and excised efficiently
by human N-methylpurine-DNA glycosylase (MPG, also
known as AAG, ANPG, APNG, or MDG) [6]. From radionucleotide incorporation fine mapping, the resulting
apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) sites are further processed by
both the short patch pathway (1-nucleotide gap filling)
with DNA polymerase (Pol) β and the long patch pathway
(2-6 nucleotide resynthesis) with Pol δ and PCNA [7].
In Escherichia coli, early studies indicated that the DNA
glycosylase encoded by alkA gene could recognize and
release hypoxanthine residues from DNA [1]. However,
© 2015 Lee et al. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided
you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate
if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/
zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Lee et al. Cell Biosci (2015) 5:52
subsequent in vivo and in vitro studies showed that DNA
glycosylase initiated BER is not the major pathway to
process dI in E. coli [8, 9]. The repair pathway initiated
by endonuclease V (EndoV, encoded by nfi gene [10]) was
shown to be the major pathway for dI processing both
in vivo and in vitro [8, 9, 11]. A mutagenesis assay also
showed that under HNO2 treatment, which will promote
hypoxanthine formation, that a nfi mutant demonstrated
over a 200-fold increase in mutation frequency, while the
alkA mutant did not significantly increase the mutation
frequency under the same experimental conditions [12].
Endonuclease V (EndoV) in E. coli is active upon DNA
exposed to UV light, OsO4, acids, or X-rays [10]. This
enzyme was later characterized as 3′-deoxyinosine endonuclease that incises the DNA at the second phosphodiester bond 3′ to the dI lesion, leaving 3′-OH and 5′-P
termini [13]. Nfi homologues from Thermotoga maritima
possess 3′-exonuclease activity that might be used for
removal of damaged bases [14], but similar exonuclease activities were not found in EndoV from E. coli and
mammalian cells. Therefore, additional enzymes are
required to excise the dI lesions in the EndoV-mediated
repair process. In our previous study, we found DNA pol
I played dual roles in both repair synthesis and using its
3′-5′ proofreading exonuclease to remove EndoV incised
dI lesion [9, 11].
A mammalian homologue of E. coli nfi gene was identified and characterized [15]. The mouse EndoV seems to
be active only on dI, while bacterial EndoV exhibits broad
substrate spectrum. Furthermore, expression of mouse
EndoV in an alkA, and nfi double mutant E. coli strain
significantly suppresses the spontaneous mutagenesis
frequency, which suggested that this eukaryotic EndoV
initiates an alternative excision repair pathway for dI correction [15]. A biochemical analysis of purified human
EndoV showed it favored dI-containing DNA but with
only a minor preference on deoxyxanthosine-containing
DNA [16]. Expression of hEndoV in E. coli cells deficient
in nfi, mug and ung genes caused 3-fold reduction in
mutation frequency [16]. However, recent reports demonstrated efficient cleavage of inosine-containing RNA by
human EndoV [17] suggesting that hEndoV may involve
in RNA editing [18]. Therefore, the full involvement of
hEndoV in dI repair in human cells is still unknown.
The major function of mismatch repair (MMR) is its
role in correction of nucleotide base misincorporation
during replication [19–21], which requires that repair be
directed to a newly synthe (...truncated)