Inter-rater agreement of an alternative guideline for the assessment of the activities of daily living in home nursing
Paquay et al. Archives of Public Health 2015, 73(Suppl 1):P44
http://www.archpublichealth.com/content/73/S1/P44
ARCHIVES OF PUBLIC HEALTH
POSTER PRESENTATION
Open Access
Inter-rater agreement of an alternative guideline
for the assessment of the activities of daily living
in home nursing
Louis Paquay1*, Lut De Prins2, Kelly Wauters2, Kristel De Vliegher1
From Methods in Epidemiology Symposium
Leuven, Belgium. 17 September 2015
Aim
To evaluate the effect of an alternative guideline on
inter-rater agreement of assessments of the activities of
daily living (ADL) performed by home care nurses and
advising nurses of health insurance organisations.
Background
High accuracy of assessments of ADL dependency is
needed for correct reimbursement of nursing care.
Health insurance organisations often report high numbers of disagreement between home care nurses and
advising nurses on the assessments of functional status
in ADL of patients receiving home nursing.
Method
A quantitative comparative field study in a stratified random sample of 612 patients receiving home nursing for
ADL deficiencies. A proportional stratification according
to mutuality membership, region (Flanders, Brussels and
the Walloon region) and the patient’s level of ADLdependency in 5 categories: minor dependency (T2 en
T7), level A, level B, level C (which is the highest level)
was performed. Home care nurses were invited by the
‘National College of Advising Physicians (NCAPh) and
the Belgian sickness funds, to participate in the study and
to perform ADL assessments according to two guidelines:
the current guideline of the Belgian Evaluation Scale
(BES) and an alternative guideline which was written by a
workgroup of the Agreement Commission for home care
nursing of the National Institute for Health and Disability
Insurance. The weighted kappa statistic (κ) (and its 95%
confidence interval) and the proportion agreement were
the main outcome measures.
Findings
Inter-rater agreement for BES total score was κ = 0.70
(0.66 - 0.74) and 63.7% proportion agreement for the current guideline; κ = 0.60 (0.55 - 0.64) and 53.8% agreement
for the alternative guideline.
Conclusion
Inter-rater agreement of assessments using the current
guideline was substantial and did not improve using the
alternative guideline. There was no evidence for adopting
the alternative guideline in legislation.
Authors’ details
1
Wit-Gele Kruis Vlaanderen, Brussels, Belgium. 2Rijksinstituut voor ziekte en
invaliditeitsverzekering, Brussels, Belgium.
Published: 17 September 2015
doi:10.1186/2049-3258-73-S1-P44
Cite this article as: Paquay et al.: Inter-rater agreement of an alternative
guideline for the assessment of the activities of daily living in home
nursing. Archives of Public Health 2015 73(Suppl 1):P44.
1
Wit-Gele Kruis Vlaanderen, Brussels, Belgium
Full list of author information is available at the end of the article
© 2015 Paquay et al. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the
original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/
zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
(...truncated)