Diagnosis and susceptibility testing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Latin America
Diagnosis and susceptibility testing of methicillin-resistant
Staphylococcus aureus in Latin America
Abstract
Strategies to monitor and control the spread of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections are dependent on accurate and timely diagnosis of MRSA in both hospital and community settings.
In Latin America, significant diversity in diagnostic and susceptibility testing procedures exists at the regional, national and local levels. Various tests for S. aureus and MRSA are available in clinical settings, but
the application of these techniques differs between and within countries, and quality control measures
are not uniformly applied to verify diagnoses.
To optimize the diagnosis of MRSA infections across Latin America, a more consistent approach is required. This may include: adoption and appropriate adaption of specific guidelines for MRSA testing,
depending on local resources; establishment of a coordinated system for quality control; regional access
to central reference facilities; education of medical and healthcare professionals in best practices; and
development of systems to evaluate the implementation of guidelines and best practices.
Authors
Jeannete Zurita1
Carlos Mejía2
Manuel GuzmánBlanco3
on behalf of the Latin
American Working
Group on Gram
Positive Resistance.
1
Hospital Vozandes,
Quito, Ecuador.
2
Hospital Roosevelt,
Guatemala City,
Guatemala.
3
Centro Médico de
Caracas, Caracas,
Venezuela.
Keywords: MRSA, diagnosis, susceptibility testing, Latin America.
Introduction
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)
is an important cause of infections globally and
a growing problem across Latin America.1-3 Epidemiologic studies in the region have charted a
significant rise in MRSA infections both in hospital and community settings.1 A key step in the
successful treatment of these infections is early
and accurate diagnosis.
In clinical settings, diagnosis is based on a
combination of epidemiologic information, clinical symptoms and characterization of the infecting MRSA strain. The Monitoring/Surveillance
Network for Resistance to Antibiotics, set up with
the support of the Pan-American Health Organization (PAHO), provides epidemiologic information on bacterial resistance across Latin America.
In some countries, including Argentina, Chile,
Ecuador, Uruguay and Venezuela, an organized
quality control system is present to support local
surveillance, but in others, the capacity for microbiologic diagnosis is limited to a few large university hospitals in the major cities, and limited data,
especially regarding community-acquired MRSA,
are available in these regions.
Various international guidelines are available
that provide recommendations for best practices
in MRSA diagnosis and treatment. However, adoption of these recommendations can be sporadic,
especially at regional levels where resources may be
a significant limiting factor. Most guidelines provide a range of options for MRSA diagnosis that
can be adapted for different regional requirements.
However, it may not always be clear which tests are
appropriate and sufficient in specific circumstances. Additional guidance is therefore required to establish consistency of approach across the region.
Guidelines for
diagnosis of MRSA
Guideline documents have been published in a
number of countries outlining recommended
protocols and procedures for the identification of
MRSA (Table 14-9).
The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI; formerly the National Committee on
Correspondence to:
Jeannete Zurita
Directora del
Servicio de
Microbiología y
Tuberculosis
Hospital Vozandes
Villalengua Oe2-37
Quito, Ecuador
Phone:
+593-2-2262142
Fax:
+593-2-2269234
E-mail: jzurita@hcjb.
org.ec
S97
Diagnosis of MRSA in Latin America
Table 1. Guidelines for diagnosis of MRSA4-9
Source
Guidelines
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI)
Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing4
Surveillance for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus
aureus: Principles, Practices, and Challenges5
European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System (EARSS) New and updated protocols for antimicrobial susceptibility
testing of pathogens under EARSS surveillance 20056
Sociedad Española de Infectologia y
Microbiologia Clinica (SEIMC)
Protocolos de diagnostico en Microbiologia7
British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (BSAC)
BSAC standardized disc susceptibility testing method (version 7)8
Joint Working Party of the British Society for Antimicrobial
Chemotherapy, the Hospital Infection Society and the
Infection Control Nurses Association (BSAC/HIS/ICNA)
Guidelines for the laboratory diagnosis and susceptibility testing
of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)9
Clinical Laboratory Standards, NCCLS) in the USA has developed a range of best practice documents covering all aspects
of microbiologic testing, including recent publications entitled
‘Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing’4 and ‘Surveillance for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus
aureus: Principles, Practices, and Challenges’.5
The European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System (EARSS), funded by the European Commission, provides
a comprehensive surveillance and information system on the
spread of antimicrobial resistance in Europe. EARSS has published protocols for diagnostic testing of various organisms
with antibiotic resistance traits, including MRSA, VISA and
VRSA.6,10 Similarly, the Sociedad Española de Infectologia
y Microbiologia Clinica (SEIMC), based in Spain, has published recommendations for the identification of various bacterial strains with antimicrobial resistance, including MRSA.7
In the UK, the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (BSAC) published their first guidelines on microbial sensitivity testing in 1991, including minimum
inhibitory concentration (MIC) breakpoints for clinically
relevant bacteria, and more recently provided standardized methods for disc susceptibility testing for a range of
organisms, including MRSA.8 A Joint Working Party of the
BSAC, the Hospital Infection Society (HIS) and the Infection Control Nurses Association (ICNA) recently published
evidence-based guidelines on the laboratory diagnosis of
MRSA.9 These guidelines include recommendations on the
identification of MRSA and methods of susceptibility testing and screening.
Since the various guidelines differ in their scope and detail, and generally do not apply specifically to infections in
Latin America, infection control teams are advised to choose
guidelines to follow and to adapt them to their local situation, considering such factors as epidemiology, available
antibiotics and resources, likely sources of infection, and
risk factors associated with their specific patient population
S98
and environment. The CLSI guidelines are the guidelines of
choice in most Latin American countries. Evaluation of the
implementation of guidelines is also important, (...truncated)