Effects of Metformin Therapy on Coronary Endothelial Dysfunction in Patients With Prediabetes With Stable Angina and Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Stenosis: The CODYCE Multicenter Prospective Study
1946
Diabetes Care Volume 42, October 2019
Effects of Metformin Therapy on
Coronary Endothelial Dysfunction
in Patients With Prediabetes With
Stable Angina and Nonobstructive
Coronary Artery Stenosis: The
CODYCE Multicenter Prospective
Study
Celestino Sardu,1 Pasquale Paolisso,1
Cosimo Sacra,2 Ciro Mauro,3
Fabio Minicucci,3 Michele Portoghese,4
Maria Rosaria Rizzo,1
Michelangela Barbieri,1
Ferdinando Carlo Sasso,1
Nunzia D’Onofrio,5 Maria Luisa Balestrieri,5
Paolo Calabrò,6 Giuseppe Paolisso,1 and
Raffaele Marfella1
Diabetes Care 2019;42:1946–1955 | https://doi.org/10.2337/dc18-2356
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the effect of metformin therapy on coronary endothelial function and
major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in patients with prediabetes with stable
angina and nonobstructive coronary stenosis (NOCS).
1
CARDIOVASCULAR AND METABOLIC RISK
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
Metformin therapy may be needed to reduce coronary heart disease risk in patients
with prediabetes. A total of 258 propensity score–matched (PSM) patients with
stable angina undergoing coronary angiography were enrolled in the study. Data
from 86 PSM subjects with normoglycemia (NG), 86 PSM subjects with prediabetes
(pre-DM), and 86 PSM subjects with prediabetes treated with metformin (pre-DM
metformin) were analyzed. During coronary angiography, NOCS was categorized by
luminal stenosis <40% and fractional flow reserve >0.80. In addition, we assessed
the endothelial function, measuring coronary artery diameter of left anterior
descending coronary (LAD) at baseline and after the infusion of acetylcholine, by
means of an intracoronary Doppler guide wire. MACE, as cardiac death, myocardial
infarction, and heart failure, was evaluated at 24 months of follow-up.
RESULTS
At baseline, NG patients had a lower percentage of LAD endothelial dysfunction
compared with pre-DM patients (P < 0.05). The pre-DM patients had a higher
percentage of endothelial LAD dysfunction as compared with the pre-DM metformin patients (P < 0.05). At the 24th month of follow-up, MACE was higher in
pre-DM versus NG (P < 0.05). In pre-DM metformin patients, MACE was lower
compared with pre-DM patients (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
Metformin therapy may reduce the high risk of cardiovascular events in pre-DM
patients by reducing coronary endothelial dysfunction.
Department of Medical, Surgical, Neurological,
Metabolic and Aging Sciences, University of
Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli,” Naples, Italy
2
Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, John
Paul II Research and Care Foundation, Campobasso, Italy
3
Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Antonio Cardarelli Hospital, Naples, Italy
4
UOC Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Sassari
Hospital, Sassari, Italy
5
Department of Precision Medicine, University of
Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli,” Naples, Italy
6
Division of Clinical Cardiology, AORN Sant’Anna e
San Sebastiano, Caserta, Italy
Corresponding author: Celestino Sardu, drsarducele@
gmail.com
Received 13 November 2018 and accepted 22
January 2019
Clinical trial reg. no. NCT03553030, clinicaltrials
.gov
This article is featured in a podcast available at
http://www.diabetesjournals.org/content/diabetescore-update-podcasts.
© 2019 by the American Diabetes Association.
Readers may use this article as long as the work
is properly cited, the use is educational and not
for profit, and the work is not altered. More information is available at http://www.diabetesjournals
.org/content/license.
care.diabetesjournals.org
Prediabetes is an intermediate metabolic state between normoglycemia
and diabetes (1). Prediabetes includes
patients with impaired glucose tolerance and impaired fasting glucose and
hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) values between
5.7% and 6.4% (39–46 mmol/mol) (1).
Worldwide, more than 400 million people have prediabetes, and projections
indicate that by 2030 more than 470
million people will have prediabetes (2).
Moreover, in a recent survey based on
HbA1c results, 33.6% of outpatients (out
of 1.16 million outpatient visits analyzed)
had prediabetes (2). Intriguingly, ,1%
of those patients whose HbA1c tests
showed prediabetes were recognized
and diagnosed as such by clinicians
(1,2). To date, with a growing trend,
prediabetes affects .38% of people in
the adult population, and it is associated with an increased risk of developing
diabetes (3). Although some prospective
studies have shown that prediabetes is
associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (4,5), other studies
have not found a similar association
(6–8). However, several previous metaanalyses have led to conflicting conclusions (3,9,10), due to differences in end
point assessments and study inclusion
criteria. In this context, a very recent
study showed that prediabetes was
not associated with an increased risk
of subclinical coronary atherosclerosis
(stenosis severity $50%) evaluated
transversally by coronary computed tomographic angiography (11). Moreover,
Liu et al. (12) showed that among patients with stable, new-onset coronary
heart disease (stenosis severity $50%),
the increased cardiovascular risk in prediabetes is largely affected by the coexistence of hypertension rather than
prediabetes per se. Therefore, these
studies did not provide any evidence
about the role of prediabetes on cardiovascular outcomes in the early coronary atherosclerotic disease progression,
such as those found in nonobstructive
coronary stenosis (NOCS) (stenosis severity ,50%), or assess the specific
mechanisms transducing prediabetes environmental stimuli in coronary atherosclerotic disease progression. In this
context, the common link between prediabetes and coronary heart disease may
be represented by hyperglycemia and
insulin resistance, both leading to the
early insurgence of coronary artery
Sardu and Associates
dysfunction (13,14). Therefore, these
pathological mechanisms may cause coronary artery dysfunction also in the
absence of obstructive coronary stenosis. Recently, Sara et al. (15) showed that
patients with stable angina, stable coronary artery disease (CAD), and NOCS
have endothelial dysfunction, which is
consequently linked to an increased rate
of worse prognosis and cardiac mortality. However, a great disagreement exists
in literature about the correlation between prediabetes, endothelial dysfunction, and clinical outcomes in stable
CAD-NOCS. Thus, this study was designed
to identify differences in endothelial
coronary function, as well as major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 24
months of follow-up, between patients
with prediabetes and normoglycemic
(NG) patients with stable angina and
NOCS. In addition, American Diabetes
Association (ADA) guidelines suggest
that prediabetes be treated with hypoglycemic drugs such as metformin to
control glucose homeostasis and to reduce the risk of diabetes development
and the linked worse prognosis (16).
Intriguingly, less is known about the
effect of metformin to reduce the coronary endothelial dysfunction and the
consequent improved clinica (...truncated)