Breathing maneuvers may elicit a stronger myocardial vascular response than clinical adenosine protocols
Fischer et al. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic
Resonance 2014, 16(Suppl 1):P49
http://www.jcmr-online.com/content/16/S1/P49
POSTER PRESENTATION
Open Access
Breathing maneuvers may elicit a stronger
myocardial vascular response than
clinical adenosine protocols
Kady Fischer1*, Dominik P Guensch1,2, Matthias G Friedrich1
From 17th Annual SCMR Scientific Sessions
New Orleans, LA, USA. 16-19 January 2014
Background
Adenosine is one of the currently used agents for
pharmacological vasodilation protocols used in imaging
myocardial perfusion deficits. Yet, its clinical utility is
limited by cost, need for i.v. access, and by side effects
such as dyspnea and AV block, requiring the presence
of a trained physician during administration. Recently,
breath holds have been proposed as a potential alternative to adenosine administration; yet, the vasodilatory response has not been compared with adenosine
as a standard vasodilatory agent. We investigated the
use of breath-holds to induce vasodilation in healthy
volunteers in direct comparison to the reference adenosine using oxygenation-sensitive (OS)-CMR, which
allows for non-invasive monitoring of changes in myocardial tissue oxygenation. We combined a period of
hyperventilation with a long voluntary breath-hold to
maximize the range of the inducible vasodilatory
response.
Methods
We studied 19 healthy volunteers (mean age 43 ± 4 y)
using a clinical 3T MRI system. OS-CMR images were
acquired in one mid-ventricular short axis slice using an
ECG-triggered balanced SSFP sequence. Volunteers
hyperventilated for 60 s aiming for a rate of 40 breaths/
min followed by a maximal long breath-hold at endexpiration (HVBH). OS-CMR images were acquired
continuously throughout the long breath-hold at an
acquisition rate of 1 measurement every 4 heart beats
until the participant voluntarily commenced breathing.
Single measurement acquisitions were obtained for a
1
Philippa & Marvin Carsley CMR-Centre at the Montreal Heart Institute,
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Full list of author information is available at the end of the article
baseline image and during (3.5 minutes after start) adenosine infusion (140 μg/kg/min, i.v.). Systolic images
were analyzed for the global myocardial signal intensity
(SI) change in comparison to baseline, expressed as %
change. The breath hold was assessed at two time
points; the end of the breath-hold and the when the
maximal SI occurred. On a questionnaire, volunteers
ranked the maneuvers based on difficulty to perform.
Results
The mean duration of the HVBH was 74 s (± 7 s) with a
final change in SI of 12.8%* (± 2.0), but a peak SI of
18.1%* (± 3.9) was reached after 41 s (± 4). In comparison, the change after adenosine was significant but
yielded a change of 2.8%(± 1.2)* only. Both the final and
peak SI values were significantly greater than adenosine
(*p < 0.05, n = 19). There was not a significant difference in difficulty between the two maneuvers from the
questionnaire but 5 volunteers experienced adverse
effects with the HVBH that all disappeared with normal
breathing, whereas 11 volunteers (58%) experienced
adverse effects from adenosine, with 3 saying the effects
persisted even after the drug was stopped.
Conclusions
A breathing maneuver combining hyperventilation with
a long breath-hold may elicit a stronger vasodilatory
response than a standard clinical infusion of adenosine
and may be a simpler, cheaper, and more effective
approach to assess the vascular response in patients
with suspected coronary artery disease.
Funding
Funding is provided by the Montreal Heart Institute
Foundation and the Canadian Foundation for Innovation.
© 2014 Fischer et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons
Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in
any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://
creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Fischer et al. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic
Resonance 2014, 16(Suppl 1):P49
http://www.jcmr-online.com/content/16/S1/P49
Page 2 of 2
Figure 1 The %-change SI over the time duration of the long
breath-hold plotted with non-linear regression and 95%
confidence intervals (n = 19). The range displayed in green
demonstrates the mean peak SI and mean time this was achieved.
Figure 2 Mean ± SEM %-change OS-SI from the peak of the
HVBH, the end of the HVBH and adenosine (*p < 0.05, n = 19).
Adenosine was significantly lower then both breath-hold data
points (# < 0.05).
Authors’ details
1
Philippa & Marvin Carsley CMR-Centre at the Montreal Heart Institute,
Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 2Department Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,
Inselspital Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Published: 16 January 2014
doi:10.1186/1532-429X-16-S1-P49
Cite this article as: Fischer et al.: Breathing maneuvers may elicit a
stronger myocardial vascular response than clinical adenosine
protocols. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2014 16(Suppl 1):
P49.
Submit your next manuscript to BioMed Central
and take full advantage of:
• Convenient online submission
• Thorough peer review
• No space constraints or color figure charges
• Immediate publication on acceptance
• Inclusion in PubMed, CAS, Scopus and Google Scholar
• Research which is freely available for redistribution
Submit your manuscript at
www.biomedcentral.com/submit
(...truncated)