Inversion of droplet aerosol analyzer data for long-term aerosol–cloud interaction measurements
Open Access
Atmospheric
Measurement
Techniques
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 877–886, 2014
www.atmos-meas-tech.net/7/877/2014/
doi:10.5194/amt-7-877-2014
© Author(s) 2014. CC Attribution 3.0 License.
Inversion of droplet aerosol analyzer data for long-term
aerosol–cloud interaction measurements
M. I. A. Berghof1 , G. P. Frank1 , S. Sjogren1,* , and B. G. Martinsson1
1 Department of Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
* now at: University of Applied Sciences Northwestern Switzerland, Brugg-Windisch, Switzerland
Correspondence to: M. Berghof ()
Received: 4 October 2013 – Published in Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss.: 29 November 2013
Revised: 21 February 2014 – Accepted: 25 February 2014 – Published: 4 April 2014
Abstract. The droplet aerosol analyzer (DAA) was developed to study the influence of aerosol properties on clouds. It
measures the ambient particle size of individual droplets and
interstitial particles, the size of the dry (residual) particles after the evaporation of water vapor and the number concentration of the dry (residual) particles. A method was developed
for the evaluation of DAA data to obtain the three-parameter
data set: ambient particle diameter, dry (residual) particle diameter and number concentration. First results from in-cloud
measurements performed on the summit of Mt. Brocken in
Germany are presented. Various aspects of the cloud–aerosol
data set are presented, such as the number concentration of
interstitial particles and cloud droplets, the dry residue particle size distribution, droplet size distributions, scavenging
ratios due to cloud droplet formation and size-dependent solute concentrations. This data set makes it possible to study
clouds and the influence of the aerosol population on clouds.
1
Introduction
Clouds affect the Earth’s climate in a number of ways: for example, they regulate the hydrological cycle and redistribute
energy via the transport of water vapor and latent heat in
the atmosphere. Many factors influence the macrophysics
and microphysics of clouds. The macrophysics of clouds
are affected by large-scale meteorological conditions such
as updraft velocity, turbulent mixing or atmospheric layering. Cloud droplets form by the condensation of water vapor on aerosol particles. As a consequence, the microphysical conditions are influenced by the macrophysics, the particle number concentration and size distribution, the chemical
composition, and the mixing state of the atmospheric aerosol.
The first (Twomey) indirect aerosol effect describes changes
in cloud properties induced by changes in the properties of
aerosol particles (Warner, 1968; Twomey, 1974; Albrecht,
1989; Liou and Ou, 1989; Lohmann and Feichter, 2005). It is
still being debated as to whether changes in the microphysical properties of clouds also influence the amount of clouds
and liquid water content. These changes are also associated
with changes in precipitation efficiency and thus cloud lifetime (second indirect aerosol effect; Albrecht, 1989; Stevens
and Feingold, 2009).
This work deals with an instrument, the droplet aerosol analyzer (DAA; Martinsson, 1996), developed for experimental
studies of the interaction between aerosol and clouds. This
instrument was especially developed to study the interaction
between aerosol particles and cloud/fog droplets. The DAA
measures the ambient size of individual droplets and interstitial particles, the size of the dry (residual) particles after
the evaporation of water vapor and the number concentration. This gives a unique three-parameter data set (ambient
particle diameter, dry (residual) particle diameter, and number concentration) for both cloud droplets and interstitial particles. The DAA can provide a direct relationship between
cloud droplet size and the size of its dry residue. Other instrumentation for studying clouds, such as differential mobility particle spectrometers (DMPS), optical particle counters
(OPC; Sorensen et al., 2011), the ground-based fog monitor (Spiegel et al., 2012) or the counterflow virtual impactor
(CVI) that has a variable cut-off diameter for cloud droplets
between 1 and 30 µm (Anderson et al., 1993; Noone et al.,
1988; Ogren et al., 1985; Schwarzenboeck and Heintzenberg,
Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union.
878
M. Berghof: Inversion of DAA data for long-term AIC measurements
2000), cannot provide such a relationship, even when used in
parallel.
Previous studies with the DAA include thorough intercomparisons (Cederfelt et al., 1997; Frank et al., 1998; Martinsson et al., 1999, 2000) with other cloud/aerosol instrumentation. Results from previous studies include relationships between particle and cloud number concentrations and
cloud dynamics (Martinsson et al., 1997, 1999) as well as observations of validated cloud droplet number concentrations
reaching up to 3000 cm−3 (Martinsson et al., 2000). Findings
from previous DAA studies also include that fogs in polluted
regions consisted of droplets that were not activated (Frank
et al., 1998).
In order to improve the statistical description of the aerosol
impact on cloud microstructure for different dynamical situations, long-term measurements are needed. The previous version of the DAA required daily service to ensure high-quality
data. As a result, the instrument was only used in experiments
spanning a month or less. Here we present parts of new developments of the DAA. The overall aims of the developments
are twofold: to improve the time resolution in the measurements and to prepare the instrument for unattended long-term
operation. The time resolution was improved by a factor of
2 by changing method of voltage change in the differential
mobility analyzers (DMA) used in the DAA, increasing the
number of DMAs from seven to eight where the new DMA
provides more efficient coverage in terms of electrical mobility, and by changing the DMA aerosol to sheath air flow
ratio. Methodology for long-term operation includes closedloop sheath air circulation in all DMAs, automated dryers
for cloud droplets (Sjogren et al., 2013), automatic fill of liquid consumed by the particle detectors (condensation particle
counter (CPC)), regular, remote access to operational parameters, and logging of a large number of parameters. These
developments will be presented elsewhere. First results from
measurements at Mt. Brocken (Germany) between June and
October 2010 will be shown here. These improvements mean
that large amounts of data can be produced to study the interaction between aerosols and clouds for different aerosols and
for differences in cloud dynamics. The data produced need to
be evaluated. The previous method was based on manual fit
of the DAA spectra. Here we present an automated methodology to evaluate DAA data. The routine builds on the previous, manual, unpublished method.
2
Outdoor part
Ambient conditions
Indoor part
Laboratory conditions
Inlet
BiCh
DMA 2a CPC 2a
DMA 1a BiCh
DMA 2b CPC 2b
D (...truncated)