Advances in genetic manipulation of obligate intracellular bacterial pathogens
Review Article
published: 02 May 2011
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00097
Advances in genetic manipulation of obligate intracellular
bacterial pathogens
Paul A. Beare1, Kelsi M. Sandoz2, Anders Omsland1, Daniel D. Rockey2 and Robert A. Heinzen1*
Coxiella Pathogenesis Section, Laboratory of Intracellular Parasites, Rocky Mountain Laboratories, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National
Institutes of Health, Hamilton, MT, USA
2
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA
1
Edited by:
Rey Carabeo, Imperial College London,
UK
Reviewed by:
Mikhail A. Gavrilin, Ohio State
University, USA
Andres Vazquez-Torres, University of
Colorado Medical School, USA
*Correspondence:
Robert A. Heinzen, Rocky Mountain
Laboratories, Laboratory of Intracellular
Parasites, 903 South Fourth Street,
Hamilton, MT 59840, USA.
e-mail:
Infections by obligate intracellular bacterial pathogens result in significant morbidity and mortality
worldwide. These bacteria include Chlamydia spp., which causes millions of cases of sexually
transmitted disease and blinding trachoma annually, and members of the α-proteobacterial
genera Anaplasma, Ehrlichia, Orientia, and Rickettsia, agents of serious human illnesses including
epidemic typhus. Coxiella burnetii, the agent of human Q fever, has also been considered
a prototypical obligate intracellular bacterium, but recent host cell-free (axenic) growth has
rescued it from obligatism. The historic genetic intractability of obligate intracellular bacteria has
severely limited molecular dissection of their unique lifestyles and virulence factors involved in
pathogenesis. Host cell restricted growth is a significant barrier to genetic transformation that
can make simple procedures for free-living bacteria, such as cloning, exceedingly difficult. Low
transformation efficiency requiring long-term culture in host cells to expand small transformant
populations is another obstacle. Despite numerous technical limitations, the last decade has
witnessed significant gains in genetic manipulation of obligate intracellular bacteria including
allelic exchange. Continued development of genetic tools should soon enable routine mutation
and complementation strategies for virulence factor discovery and stimulate renewed interest
in these refractory pathogens. In this review, we discuss the technical challenges associated
with genetic transformation of obligate intracellular bacteria and highlight advances made with
individual genera.
Keywords: transposon mutagenesis, electroporation, antibiotic selection, allelic exchange, genetic transformation,
virulence factor, shuttle vector, complementation
Introduction
Obligate intracellular bacterial pathogens are an understudied
but significant group of human disease agents. These bacteria are
thought to have emerged from ancestral non-pathogens through
a pathoadaptive evolutionary process that involves significant
genome reduction (Pallen and Wren, 2007). Ongoing gene loss
in obligate intracellular bacteria is indicated by the presence of
pseudogenes whose functions are often compensated for by the
host cell. Some obligate intracellular bacteria, such as Rickettsia
prowazekii and Chlamydia trachomatis, appear in the final stages of
host cell adaptation, having cleared most pseudogenes from their
respective genomes (Andersson and Andersson, 1999). Relative
to these bacteria, Coxiella burnetii has a sophisticated genome
with central metabolic pathways largely intact, suggesting a more
recent adaptation to an obligate intracellular lifestyle (Seshadri
et al., 2003).
Despite dramatically reduced genomes relative to most freeliving bacterial pathogens, obligate intracellular bacterial pathogens still retain potent pathogenetic potential that can manifest
in infections ranging from asymptomatic to fulminating and
deadly (Walker, 1989; Maurin and Raoult, 1999). Unfortunately,
the historic lack of genetic tools for obligates has severely limited
molecular dissection of mechanisms associated with intracellular
parasitism and animal pathogenesis. Many genes encoding putative
www.frontiersin.org
virulence factors have been revealed by pathogen genome sequences
(Andersson et al., 1998; Seshadri et al., 2003). However, because
methods for site-specific gene inactivation and complementation
are lacking, molecular Koch’s postulates (Falkow, 2004) have been
impossible to fulfill for these genes. Consequently, gene function
and regulation have often been explored using heterologous expression in surrogate hosts (Whitworth et al., 2005; Raghavan et al.,
2008; Voth et al., 2009).
In this review, we discuss the experimental hurdles associated
with developing genetic transformation systems for obligate intracellular bacteria and review the genetic tools that are currently
available.
Technical considerations in transforming obligate
intracellular bacteria
A pathogen’s obligate reliance on a eukaryotic host cell for
growth complicates several steps in genetic transformation that
are easily conducted with free-living bacteria. Nonetheless, by
employing tenacity and attention to detail, several investigators
have overcome technical hurdles to establish at least rudimentary genetic systems for most pathogenic obligate intracellular
bacteria. In this section, we highlight the special experimental
considerations associated with genetic transformation systems
of these bacteria.
May 2011 | Volume 2 | Article 97 | 1
Beare et al.
Bacterial purification
Before any genetic transformation procedure, obligate intracellular bacteria must be purified to some extent from host cells and
concentrated to high density in a viable form. Depending on the
degree of purity, the procedure can involve several centrifugation
steps that take nearly a full day to complete (Shannon and Heinzen,
2007). For organisms that grow to low density in host cells, such as
spotted fever group (SFG) rickettsia, yields can be poor and allow
for only a few electroporation experiments (Kleba et al., 2010). To
ensure utmost viability, some obligate intracellular bacteria are
electroporated immediately after purification (Qin et al., 2004),
thereby eliminating the convenience of storing purified bacteria for
subsequent transformation experiments. Several low ionic strength
electroporation buffers have been used, ranging from distilled water
(Binet and Maurelli, 2009) to buffers containing osmoprotectants
such as sucrose and glycerol (Beare et al., 2009). Organisms are
washed several times in buffers and resuspended at high density
(approx. 1010 bacteria per ml) prior to electroporation.
A consideration when purifying obligate intracellular bacteria
for transformation experiments is that many display developmental forms that may be differentially infective and/or receptive
to electroporation. For example, the large reticulate cell (RC) of
Anaplasma phagocytophilum may be more amenable to electroporation than the smaller dense-cored cell (DC) with (...truncated)