Stereotactic/hypofractionated body radiation therapy as an effective treatment for lymph node metastases from colorectal cancer: an institutional retrospective analysis.
BJR
Received:
6 June 2017
© 2017 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology
Revised:
10 August 2017
Accepted:
23 August 2017
https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20170422
Cite this article as:
Franzese C, Fogliata A, Comito T, Tozzi A, Iftode C, Clerici E, et al. Stereotactic/hypofractionated body radiation therapy as an effective
treatment for lymph node metastases from colorectal cancer: an institutional retrospective analysis. Br J Radiol 2017; 90: 20170422.
full paper
Stereotactic/hypofractionated body radiation therapy
as an effective treatment for lymph node metastases
from colorectal cancer: an institutional retrospective
analysis
1
Ciro Franzese, MD, 1Antonella Fogliata, MSc, 1Tiziana Comito, MD, 1Angelo Tozzi, MD,
Cristina Iftode, MD, 1Elena Clerici, MD, 1Davide Franceschini, MD, 1Pierina Navarria, MD,
1
Anna Maria Ascolese, MD, 1Lucia Di Brina, MD, 1Fiorenza De Rose, MD, 1Giuseppe R D'Agostino, MD,
1,2
Luca Cozzi, PhD and 1,2Marta Scorsetti, MD,Prof
1
1
Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Humanitas Research Hospital and Cancer Center, Milan-Rozzano, Italy
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan-Rozzano, Italy
2
Address correspondence to: Antonella Fogliata
E-mail:
Objective: The colorectal cancer (CRC) might present
loco-regional recurrence, including lymph-node metastasis. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a
non-invasive and well-tolerated ablative treatment. Aim
of the present study is to evaluate efficacy and toxicity
of SBRT with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT)
in this setting.
Methods: 35 patients presenting a total of 47 nodal recurrences from CRC, treated with VMAT-SBRT from 2008
to 2015, were selected. About three fourth of the treatments delivered 45 Gy in 6 daily fractions. End-points
were the detection of toxicities, overall survival (OS),
local control (LC), disease progression free incidence
(DPFI) and disease free survival (DFS). Tumour response
was assessed according to the RECIST criteria.
Results: Only Grade 1 and 2 toxicities were recorded.
Median follow-up was 15 months (range 2–68). Local
relapse was reported in 6 patients, regional relapse in
10 patients. Complete remission was reported in 20
cases (53%), partial remission in 14 (37%). Rates of LC
at 1, 2 and 3 years were 85.3, 75.0 and 75.0%, respectively. At 1 year the actuarial OS was 100%, at 2 and
3 years was 81.4%. Median DFS was estimated in 16
months, with an incidence of 69.4, 33.3 and 19.4% at 1,
2 and 3 years, respectively.
Conclusion: The use of the VMAT-SBRT in lymph-node
recurrence of CRC could prevent severe complications
and achieve satisfying rates of disease control.
Advances in knowledge: The use of VMAT-SBRT is a
viable approach for lymph-node recurrence of CRC.
Introduction
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common
cause of cancer-related death worldwide.1 Even if the
management of CRC has continued to evolve during
the last century, approximately 20–50% of patients
will develop recurrence after definitive treatment for
primary tumour.2–4
was described as oligometastatic state for the first time by
Hellman and Weichselbaum.6 It can be considered an intermediate state between local disease and widespread disease,
and could be still amenable of a local treatment. Lateral
pelvis (LPLN) and paraortic lymph node (PALN) can be
site of metastases from CRC. While PALN are considered
as M1 stage by the American Joint Committee for Cancer
(AJCC),7 LPLN are considered regional lymph nodes.
Kobayashi et al8 demonstrated that the risk of lymph node
metastases to the LPLN is about 16.5% in T3 and 37.2%
in T4 disease. Lower is the risk of PALN, with an overall
incidence of 1.7%.9 Although liver and lung resection in
oligometastatic CRC is recognized as an effective approach,
surgical dissection of lymph node metastasis is not widely
accepted due to the lack of clinical evidence and to the high
post-operative morbidity.
The improvement of both surgical techniques and of
radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy approaches,
decreased the rate of local recurrence to 4–8%.5
However, the risk of loco-regional and distant metastases
still persist.
Recurrences from CRC often present as solitary disease or
a limited number of metastases.3 This pattern of recurrence
Franzese et al
BJR
The improvement in the last decades of the RT treatments
increased the possibility to approach on isolated metastatic
foci with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). SBRT is a
non-invasive and well-tolerated ablative treatment, and its role
in oligometastatic CRC has been extensively investigated. Hoyer
et al10 published the results of a phase II study investigating the
role of SBRT in oligometastatic CRC patients. 64 patients with a
total number of 141 lesions were enrolled (44 in the liver, 12 in
the lungs, 3 lymph nodes, 1 adrenal gland and 4 in two organs)
and after 2 years, actuarial local control (LC) was 86 and 63% in
tumour and patient based analysis, respectively.
We previously published our experience with the use SBRT and
volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for the treatment of
abdominal lymph node metastases from different histologies. We
included 71 patients with a total of 79 lesions, treated with a dose
of 45 Gy delivered in 6 daily fractions of 7.5 Gy each. In our
analysis disease control was achieved in 97.5% of the lesions with
an actuarial LC rate at 1 year of 83%.11
Few reports describe the role of SBRT specifically for the treatment of lymph node metastases in oligometastatic CRC. One of
the first data were published by Kim et al.12 They only included
7 patients with PALN recurrence, and the reported 1- and 3-year
overall survival (OS) rates were 100 and 71.4%, respectively.
Aim of the present study is to evaluate the efficacy and pattern
of toxicity of SBRT with VMAT for the treatment of lymph node
metastasis in oligometastatic CRC patients.
Table 1. Patient and treatment characteristics
No. of patients
35
No. of treatments
38
No. of lesions
47
Age
Median, range (y.o.)
66, 32–89
Sex
Male
24
Female
11
Median, range (months)
15, 2–68
Colon
26
Rectum
9
Solitary
17
Follow-up
Primary tumour
Type of nodal
metastasis
Site of nodal
metastasis
Inclusion criteria were: no more than three lymph node metastases; maximum diameter 5 cm on CT or MRI scan; no evidence
of progressive or untreated gross disease outside the lymph node;
no concurrent chemotherapy, interrupted at least 1 week before;
primary tumour was resected or under control; other sites of
metastatic disease, different from lymph node, were accepted if
amenable of ablative treatment or surgery. Minimum age 18 years
old. Patients were excluded if the lesions were bigger than 5 cm in
maximum diameter; if the lesions were treated with other local
approaches or if they had other abdominal illnesses that contraindicate RT, as inflammatory bowel disease or bowel ulcers.
Three of those patients (males) were treated for different nodal
r (...truncated)