The prevalence and intensity of external and internal parasites in working donkeys (Equus asinus) in Egypt
Veterinary World, EISSN: 2231-0916
Available at www.veterinaryworld.org/Vol.11/September-2018/16.pdf
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Open Access
The prevalence and intensity of external and internal parasites in
working donkeys (Equus asinus) in Egypt
Marwa M. Attia1, Marwa M. Khalifa1 and Marwa Th. Atwa2
1. Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt; 2. Department of Zoology,
Faculty of Science, Al-Fayoum University, Egypt.
Corresponding author: Marwa M. Attia, e-mail:
Co-authors: MMK: , MTA:
Received: 14-05-2018, Accepted: 26-07-2018, Published online: 19-09-2018
doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2018.1298-1306 How to cite this article: Attia MM, Khalifa MM, Atwa MT (2018) The prevalence and
intensity of external and internal parasites in working donkeys (Equus asinus) in Egypt, Veterinary World, 11(9):1298-1306.
Abstract
Aim: This study aims to record and update the prevalence and intensity of external and internal parasites in working
donkeys (Equus asinus) in Egypt during the period from January to December 2017.
Materials and Methods: A total of 120 donkeys (10 donkeys each month) were examined at Giza zoo abattoir through
bimonthly visits. The examined donkeys were obtained from five governorates (Giza [20], Fayoum [40], Beni Suef [30],
Monofia [20], and Assiut [10]). The animals were grouped according to age and sex.
Results: All examined donkeys were positive with at least one internal or even external parasitic species. The overall
prevalence rate was 100%. A total of 11 helminths species (10 nematodes and 1 metacestode); 7 protozoal and 7 arthropod
species were collected. The number of each parasite and intensity of infection with regard to age and sex was recorded.
Conclusion: All examined donkeys were infected with parasites with an overall prevalence of 100%. So, we recommended
following up and continuous treatment of such diseased animal.
Keywords: arthropods, donkeys, Egypt, external parasites, helminths, internal parasites, protozoa.
Introduction
More than 40 million donkeys are distributed
throughout the world [1]. The donkey population in
Africa is estimated to be 13 million [2]. According to
the latest Food and Agriculture Organization statistics,
there are approximately 3 million working donkeys in
Egypt. The working donkeys, horses, and mules carry
out a wide range of work types. These animals are
used for transportation of passengers and goods by
carts in urban areas in the busy cities and towns.
The most important problems for equines and
donkeys in developing countries are gastrointestinal
parasitism [3]. Donkeys harbor a large number of parasites including roundworms (families: Stronglidae,
Oxyuridae, Trichostronglidae, and Ascaridae),
flatworms (Fasciolidae), and tapeworm (family:
Anoplocephalidae) which damage the intestine
depending on the species and number of parasites [3].
Infections with endoparasites cause loss of condition,
poor reproduction of animals, colic, and diarrhea [4].
Furthermore, blood protozoal diseases are one of
the important parasitic infections which affect family
Equidae in Egypt. Equine piroplasmosis is the tickborne disease caused by Theileria equi (Babesia equi)
Copyright: Attia, et al. Open Access. This article is distributed under
the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
License
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/),
which
permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any
medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original
author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons
license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons
Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/
publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this
article, unless otherwise stated.
Veterinary World, EISSN: 2231-0916
which causes abortions, loss of performance, and
death [5]. Trypanosomes are blood parasites found
in mammals including donkeys; Trypanosoma evansi
which is one of the trypanosomes infecting donkeys [6].
This study aims to record and update the prevalence and intensity of external and internal parasites in
working donkeys (Equus asinus) in Egypt during the
period from January to December 2017.
Materials and Methods
Ethical approval
This study was approved by the Ethical
Committee, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo
University with number CU/II/F/18/103.
Animals
During the period from January to December
2017, 120 donkeys (10 donkeys each month) were
examined at postmortem in Giza Zoo abattoir (Giza,
Egypt) through bimonthly visits, for the detection of
internal and external parasitic infection. The donkeys
were obtained from five governorates (Giza [20],
Fayoum [40], Beni Suef [30], Monofia [20], and Assiut
[10]). The animals were grouped according to age as
from 1 to 2 years (25), 3-5 years (35), and 6-8 years
(60), of which 90 donkeys were male and 30 were
female. The animals were field working donkeys, fed
on green ration, and never received any antiparasitic
medications. These animals send for slaughtering in
this abattoir are usually emaciated and unsuitable for
working. Each donkey was physically examined before
slaughtering, for determination of the age and sex as
well as examination of external parasites on skin.
1298
Available at www.veterinaryworld.org/Vol.11/September-2018/16.pdf
Fecal sample collection and examination
Fecal samples were collected directly from the
rectum of donkeys before slaughtering. The feces
were collected in separate polyethylene bags and
labeled for identification. Microscopic examination of
the samples was performed in the Laboratory of the
Parasitology Department in the Faculty of Veterinary
Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt. The gross
fecal examination was done for the collection of adult
nematodes and/or the gravid segment of cestodes.
Microscopic fecal examination
Direct smear method
A small amount of feces was placed on the clean
glass slide and mixed with a drop of water; a coverslip
was applied on the fecal smear and examined under
the microscope to detect and identify the parasitic
ova [7].
Floatation and sedimentation technique
Floatation technique
One g of feces was diluted with 10 ml of saturated salt solution in the test tube which was filled
to the top with the salt. A clean cover glass slip was
sideways over the top of the tube. After 10 min, the
cover was taken onto the slide and examined under
the light microscope using the magnification power
40 and 100×.
Sedimentation method
Two g of feces was dissolved in tap water in a
beaker and allowed the mixture to sediment without disturbing for 20-30 min. The supernatant was
poured off to collect the sediment for examination [7].
A small amount of the sediment was transferred to a
small Petri dish and examined under the light microscope using the magnification power 40 and 100×.
Examination of gastrointestinal samples
The samples were collected from stomach and
small and large in (...truncated)