Advances in the Application of Biomimetic Endometrium Interfaces for Uterine Bioengineering in Female Infertility
MINI REVIEW
published: 28 February 2020
doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00153
Advances in the Application of
Biomimetic Endometrium Interfaces
for Uterine Bioengineering in Female
Infertility
Qixin Han 1,2 and Yanzhi Du 1,2*
1
2
Edited by:
Francesca Taraballi,
Houston Methodist Research
Institute, United States
Reviewed by:
Stephanie Michelle Willerth,
University of Victoria, Canada
Gianluca Ciardelli,
Politecnico di Torino, Italy
Dong-Wook Han,
Pusan National University,
South Korea
*Correspondence:
Yanzhi Du
Specialty section:
This article was submitted to
Biomaterials,
a section of the journal
Frontiers in Bioengineering and
Biotechnology
Received: 20 November 2019
Accepted: 14 February 2020
Published: 28 February 2020
Citation:
Han Q and Du Y (2020) Advances
in the Application of Biomimetic
Endometrium Interfaces for Uterine
Bioengineering in Female Infertility.
Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 8:153.
doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00153
Center for Reproductive Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China,
Shanghai Key Laboratory for Assisted Reproduction and Reproductive Genetics, Shanghai, China
The Asherman’s syndrome, also known as intrauterine adhesion, often follows
endometrium injuries resulting from dilation and curettage, hysteroscopic resection,
and myomectomy as well as infection. It often leads to scarring formation and female
infertility. Pathological changes mainly include gland atrophy, lack of vascular stromal
tissues and hypoxia and anemia microenvironment in the adhesion areas. Surgical
intervention, hormone therapy and intrauterine device implantation are the present
clinical treatments for Asherman’s syndrome. However, they do not result in functional
endometrium recovery or pregnancy rate improvement. Instead, an increasing number
of researches have paid attention to the reconstruction of biomimetic endometrium
interfaces with advanced tissue engineering technology in recent decades. From
micro-scale cell sheet engineering and cell-seeded biological scaffolds to nanoscale extracellular vesicles and bioactive molecule delivery, biomimetic endometrium
interfaces not only recreate physiological multi-layered structures but also restore an
appropriate nutritional microenvironment by increasing vascularization and reducing
immune responses. This review comprehensively discusses the advances in the
application of novel biocompatible functionalized endometrium interface scaffolds for
uterine tissue regeneration in female infertility.
Keywords: endometrium interface, uterus regeneration, nano-scale, biomimetic scaffold, female infertility
INTRODUCTION
Secondary infertility is the most common type of female infertility worldwide, often because of
endometrium injuries and subsequent intrauterine adhesion (IUA). It poses a great threat to female
physical and mental health (Deans et al., 2018; Vander Borght and Wyns, 2018; Dreisler and Kjer,
2019). The uterus tissue is made up of three layers, among which the endometrium, composed
of functional and basal layers, is the inner-most layer. The functional endometrium is the site of
embryo implantation and is regulated by changes in ovarian hormones. The basal endometrium
regenerates and repairs the endometrium wound after menstruation, and forms the functional layer
again, possibly via the intrinsic endometrial cells, such as endometrial epithelial and stromal cells,
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology | www.frontiersin.org
1
February 2020 | Volume 8 | Article 153
Han and Du
Biomimetic Endometrium Interfaces for Uterine Bioengineering
endometrial stem cells and perivascular cells. They may secrete
bioactive molecules, growth factors, hormones and contribute
to angiogenesis and endometrium regeneration after uterus
injuries. The pathological changes include endometrial fibrosis
and scarring, loss or thinning of endometrium due to different
degrees of damage to the basal layer of endometrium, IUA
between anterior and posterior walls, and shrinkage of uterine
cavity (Conforti et al., 2013). Microscopic observation shows
gland atrophy, lack of vascular stromal tissues and hypoxia
and anemia microenvironment in the adhesion areas (EvansHoeker and Young, 2014; Healy et al., 2016). Present clinical
techniques, such as hormonal therapy, surgical synechiotomy
and subsequent intrauterine device (IUD) implantation, show
unsatisfactory outcomes, recurrent adhesion and secondary
infection during the treatment of IUA, also known as Asherman’s
syndrome (Cai et al., 2016, 2017; Mo et al., 2019). The surgical
synechiotomy helps surgeons release the adhesive fibrosis with
blunt-end scissors. However, the postoperative recovery shows
a huge variation among different patients due to adhesion
severity. Some of them even experienced greater adhesion
recurrence. Hormonal therapy works effectively after surgical
release of IUA. Nevertheless, it is still hard to confirm a
suitable medication dosage and route due to the short halflife period, low water solubility and big differences in response.
As for the IUDs, they only function as physical barriers.
However, they can barely induce regenerative process and thus
yield low endometrium recovery. Therefore, it is urgent and
vital to find alternative treatments for Asherman’s syndrome
(Dreisler and Kjer, 2019).
The development of biomimetic tissue engineering provides
an alternative therapy that may increase the success of
uterine regeneration and reproductive capacity (Cervelló et al.,
2015). Biomaterial is an important factor in the tissue
engineering because it can provide structural support that
mimics native endometrium tissues and uterine organs (Zhang
et al., 2020). In addition, some biomedical materials are
characterized by physical, chemical and biological properties
that are closely related to uterus regeneration. The other
two factors in the tissue engineering are supporting cells
and bioactive molecules. They both facilitate cellular and
extracellular signaling, nutrient transport, stem cell recruitment,
proliferation and differentiation. Biomaterials can release drugs,
growth factors, small molecules and other bioactive compounds
in a controlled style, with or without cell loading and
modification. Recent researches have shown that, in addition to
traditional biomaterial based uterus regeneration, combination
and modification of cells and biomaterials, such as cell
sheets, cell-scaffold interfaces, surface-functionalized scaffolds
and decellularization of biological tissues may also display
functional or structural advantages and repair injured uterus
to different extents by inducing biomimetic changes and
recreating regenerative microenvironment (Liu et al., 2019a).
Therefore, we comprehensively reviewed current advances in
the biological interactions and applications of different types
of biomimetic endometrium and uterus scaffolds for female
infertility treatment and compared their potential therapeutic
effects in this re (...truncated)