Natural Polyphenols for Prevention and Treatment of Cancer
nutrients
Review
Natural Polyphenols for Prevention and Treatment
of Cancer
Yue Zhou 1 , Jie Zheng 1 , Ya Li 1 , Dong-Ping Xu 1 , Sha Li 2 , Yu-Ming Chen 1 and Hua-Bin Li 1,3, *
1
2
3
*
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Food, Nutrition and Health, School of Public Health,
Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China; (Y.Z.);
(J.Z.); (Y.L.); (D.-P.X.);
(Y.-M.C.)
School of Chinese Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China;
South China Sea Bioresource Exploitation and Utilization Collaborative Innovation Center,
Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510006, China
Correspondence: ; Tel.: +86-20-8733-2391
Received: 15 June 2016; Accepted: 12 August 2016; Published: 22 August 2016
Abstract: There is much epidemiological evidence that a diet rich in fruits and vegetables could lower
the risk of certain cancers. The effect has been attributed, in part, to natural polyphenols. Besides,
numerous studies have demonstrated that natural polyphenols could be used for the prevention and
treatment of cancer. Potential mechanisms included antioxidant, anti-inflammation as well as the
modulation of multiple molecular events involved in carcinogenesis. The current review summarized
the anticancer efficacy of major polyphenol classes (flavonoids, phenolic acids, lignans and stilbenes)
and discussed the potential mechanisms of action, which were based on epidemiological, in vitro,
in vivo and clinical studies within the past five years.
Keywords: polyphenol; flavonoid; anticancer; antioxidant; anti-inflammation
1. Introduction
Globally, there were approximately 14.1 million new cancer cases in 2012, and the number was
estimated to reach 25 million in 2032. Aside from the high incidence, cancer is also one of the leading
causes of death. In 2012 alone, there were about 8.2 million cancer-related deaths, which were mainly
attributed to lung, gastric, colorectal, liver, breast, prostate and cervical cancer [1]. The situation urges
the research of cancer prevention and treatment. In the last two decades, the anticancer effects of natural
polyphenols have become a hot topic in many laboratories. Meanwhile, polyphenols are potential
candidates for the discovery of anticancer drugs. Polyphenols are defined as compounds having at least
one aromatic ring with one or more hydroxyl functional groups attached. Natural polyphenols refer
to a large group of plant secondary metabolites ranging from small molecules to highly polymerized
compounds [2]. Polyphenols are widely present in foods and beverages of plant origins (e.g., fruits,
vegetables, spices, soy, nuts, tea and wine) [3–5]. Based on chemical structures, natural polyphenols
can be divided into five classes, including flavonoids, phenolic acids, lignans, stilbenes and other
polyphenols. Flavonoids and phenolic acids are the most common classes, and account for about 60%
and 30% of all natural polyphenols, respectively (Table 1) [6]. A plethora of studies have documented
the anticancer effects of natural polyphenols [7–11]. Noteworthy examples include anthocyanins from
blueberries, epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) from green tea, resveratrol from red wine and isoflavones
from soy. The anticancer efficacy of natural polyphenols has largely been attributed to their potent
antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities as well as their abilities to modulate molecular targets and
signaling pathways, which were associated with cell survival, proliferation, differentiation, migration,
angiogenesis, hormone activities, detoxification enzymes, immune responses, etc. [12,13].
Nutrients 2016, 8, 515; doi:10.3390/nu8080515
www.mdpi.com/journal/nutrients
Nutrients 2016, 8, 515
2 of 35
The present review summarized recent discoveries about the anti-carcinogenic properties of
natural polyphenols and discussed the mechanisms of action, which were based on evidence from
epidemiological studies, laboratory experiments and clinical trials.
Table 1. The classification of natural polyphenols.
Classification
Representative Members
Major Dietary Sources
anthocyanins
delphinidin, pelargonidin,
cyanidin, malvidin
berries, grapes, cherries,
plums, pomegranates
flavanols
epicatechin, epigallocatechin,
EGCG, procyanidins
apples, pears, legumes, tea,
cocoa, wine
flavanones
hesperidin, naringenin
citrus fruits
flavones
apigenin, chrysin, luteolin,
parsley, celery, orange,
onions, tea, honey, spices
flavonols
quercetin, kaempferol, myricetin,
isorhamnetin, galangin
berries, apples, broccoli,
beans, tea
genistein, daidzein
soy
hydroxybenoic acid
ellagic acid, gallic acid
pomegranate, grapes,
berries, walnuts, chocolate,
wine, green tea
hydroxycinnamic acid
ferulic acid, chlorogenic acid
coffee, cereal grains
lignans
sesamin, secoisolariciresinol
diglucoside
flaxseeds, sesame
stilbenes
resveratrol, pterostilbene,
piceatannol
grapes, berries, red wine
flavonoids
isoflavonoids
phenolic acids
2. Epidemiological Studies
Evidence from epidemiological studies is inconsistent, especially when considering the results of
prospective cohort studies (Table 2). A case-control study in Canada reported favorable effects of a high
dietary intake of total flavonoids on lung cancer risks [14]. Apart from this, in a Korean study, for
women, the intake of total flavonoids, as well as flavones and anthocyanidins, was inversely associated
with the risk of gastric cancer [15]. However, another study in America found no significant association
between flavonoids intake and the incidence or survival of gastric cancer [16]. For colorectal cancer,
a meta-analysis showed protective roles of high dietary isoflavone intake [17]. Besides, a Spanish
case-control study suggested that the dietary intake of total flavonoids (especially certain subclasses)
and lignans might decrease colorectal cancer risks [18]. However, large prospective cohorts showed that
high habitual consumption of flavonoids could not protect against colorectal cancer [19]. In addition,
the Fukuoka study reported no association between total dietary polyphenols and colorectal cancer
risks [20]. For hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer
and Nutrition suggested that a high intake of dietary flavanols, but not total flavonoids, might
modestly decrease HCC risks [21,22]. In addition, according to a meta-analysis, the risk of breast
cancer was reduced in women with a high intake of flavonols and flavones [23]. Studies also suggested
that soy isoflavone intake reduced breast cancer risk for Asian women, which was more potent
for post-menopausal women (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.28–0.78) than for premenopausal women (OR 0.63,
95% CI 0.50–0.80). However, for women in Western countries, no significant association could be
found, which might due to low levels of isoflavone consumption in the Western population [24,25].
In addition, the estrogen receptor (ER) status might modify the association. For example, a U.S.
prospective cohort study showe (...truncated)