Impact of vitamin D on immune function: lessons learned from genome-wide analysis
REVIEW ARTICLE
published: 21 April 2014
doi: 10.3389/fphys.2014.00151
Impact of vitamin D on immune function: lessons learned
from genome-wide analysis
Rene F. Chun 1 , Philip T. Liu 1 , Robert L. Modlin 2 , John S. Adams 1 and Martin Hewison 1*
1
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopedic Hospital Research Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles,
Los Angeles, CA, USA
2
Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Edited by:
Carsten Carlberg, University of
Eastern Finland, Finland
Reviewed by:
Dieter Steinhilber, Goethe
Universitat, Germany
Mieke Verstuyf, Katholieke
Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
*Correspondence:
Martin Hewison, Orthopedic
Hospital Research Center, 615
Charles E. Young Drive South, Room
410D, Los Angeles, CA 90095-7358,
USA
e-mail:
Immunomodulatory responses to the active form of vitamin D (1,25-dihydroxyvitamin
D, 1,25D) have been recognized for many years, but it is only in the last 5 years
that the potential role of this in normal human immune function has been recognized.
Genome-wide analyses have played a pivotal role in redefining our perspective on vitamin
D and immunity. The description of increased vitamin D receptor (VDR) and 1α-hydroxylase
(CYP27B1) expression in macrophages following a pathogen challenge, has underlined
the importance of intracrine vitamin D as key mediator of innate immune function. It
is now clear that both macrophages and dendritic cells (DCs) are able to respond to
25-hydroxyvitamin D (25D), the major circulating vitamin D metabolite, thereby providing
a link between the function of these cells and the variations in vitamin D status common
to many humans. The identification of hundreds of primary 1,25D target genes in immune
cells has also provided new insight into the role of vitamin D in the adaptive immune
system, such as the modulation of antigen-presentation and T cells proliferation and
phenotype, with the over-arching effects being to suppress inflammation and promote
immune tolerance. In macrophages 1,25D promotes antimicrobial responses through
the induction of antibacterial proteins, and stimulation of autophagy and autophagosome
activity. In this way variations in 25D levels have the potential to influence both innate
and adaptive immune responses. More recent genome-wide analyses have highlighted
how cytokine signaling pathways can influence the intracrine vitamin D system and either
enhance or abrogate responses to 25D. The current review will discuss the impact of
intracrine vitamin D metabolism on both innate and adaptive immunity, whilst introducing
the concept of disease-specific corruption of vitamin D metabolism and how this may alter
the requirements for vitamin D in maintaining a healthy immune system in humans.
Keywords: macrophage, dendritic cell, intracrine, antigen-presentation, antibacterial, CYP27B1, VDR
INTRODUCTION
Amongst the many reported extra-skeletal effects of vitamin D, its
ability to regulate immunity through effects on both the innate
and adaptive systems has received considerable attention. This
stems in part from homage to studies carried out more than a century ago by a then relatively unknown scientist, Dr. Nils Finsen. In
1903 Dr. Finsen won the Nobel Prize for Medicine or Physiology
for showing that he could cure the epidermal form of tuberculosis (TB), lupus vulgaris, using concentrated light irradiation
(Moller et al., 2005). The subsequent discovery that exposure to
ultra-violet light promotes epidermal synthesis of vitamin D led
to further studies describing the successful use of oral vitamin
D supplementation to treat lupus vulgaris, and other mycobacterial infections such as leprosy (Airey, 1946; Herrera, 1949). The
advent of antibiotic therapies for infectious diseases appeared to
have consigned these studies to the history books. However, in
2006 the work of Finsen returned to center stage as a consequence
of a series of genome-wide analyses that revealed pathogeninduction of an intracrine vitamin D system in monocytes (Liu
et al., 2006), and an associated mechanism for anti-mycobacterial
www.frontiersin.org
actions of vitamin D (Wang et al., 2004), whilst also shedding light
on how these responses may vary according to the vitamin D “status” of any given individual. With increasing awareness of vitamin
D-deficiency across the globe (Holick, 2007), and ongoing discussions concerning the physiological and clinical relevance of this
(Holick et al., 2011; Ross et al., 2011), these genome-wide analyses have played a pivotal role in defining our new perspective on
non-classical vitamin D physiology. The current review will detail
these developments and how they have helped to define a role for
vitamin D in normal immune function.
ANTIBACTERIAL RESPONSES TO VITAMIN D
Despite its early use in the treatment of mycobacterial diseases such as TB and leprosy (Airey, 1946; Herrera, 1949), the
immunomodulatory actions of vitamin D did not become clear
until much later. Elucidation of this important non-classical
action of vitamin D stemmed from two key observations. Firstly,
most proliferating cells within the immune system express the
nuclear receptor for active 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25D)—
the vitamin D receptor (VDR). Initial studies focused on 1,25D
April 2014 | Volume 5 | Article 151 | 1
Chun et al.
binding capacity in cells from the adaptive immune system such
as T and B lymphocytes (T and B cells) (Bhalla et al., 1983;
Provvedini et al., 1983), with subsequent reports describing specific intracellular binding of 1,25D in cells from the innate
immune system such as monocytes/macrophages (Kreutz et al.,
1993), dendritic cells (DC) (Brennan et al., 1987), neutrophils
(Takahashi et al., 2002), and monocytic cell lines (Mangelsdorf
et al., 1984). The functional significance of these data was not
immediately clear but, nevertheless, it was assumed that VDRexpressing immune cells were able to respond the circulating
active 1,25D in a similar fashion to classical vitamin D target
tissues such as the intestine, kidney, and bone. However, this
assumption was challenged by the second major observation linking vitamin D and the immunity, namely the discovery of active
vitamin D metabolism by cells from the immune system.
Elevated serum levels of 1,25D reported for some patients with
the granulomatous disease sarcoidosis were shown to be due to
conversion of pro-hormone 25D to 1,25D by tissue and systemic
macrophages in these patients (Barbour et al., 1981; Adams et al.,
1983). Similar observations for other inflammatory and granulomatous diseases (Kallas et al., 2010) suggested that immune
activity of the enzyme that catalyzes metabolism of 25D to 1,25D,
25-hydroxyvitamin D-1α-hydroxylase (1α-hydroxylase) was a
disease-related phenomenon. However, other studies, in vitro,
highlighting the potential for macrophage 1α-hydroxylase a (...truncated)