Is serum fibrinogen an affirmative marker for vaginal delivery without PPH?
DOI -10.21276/obgyn.2020.6.2.10
ISSN Print – 2454-2334; ISSN Online – 2454-2342
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Is serum fibrinogen an affirmative marker for vaginal
delivery without PPH?
Rachna Agarwal, Neha Jaiswal, Rajarshi Kar, Alpana Singh, Himsweta Srivastava
Correspondence: Dr. Rachna Agarwal, Professor. Department of Obstetrics and
Gynaecology, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, Delhi;
Email -
Distributed under Attribution-Non Commercial – Share Alike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
ABSTRACT
Objective: This study was conducted to see whether predelivery serum fibrinogen is a positive marker for
conception ending with ‘physiological’ blood loss instead of predicting PPH. Methods: Low-risk pregnant
women after 24 weeks of gestation with singleton pregnancy were prospectively followed for spontaneous
vaginal delivery. Predelivery blood samples collected antenatally were preserved for estimation of serum
fibrinogen. We excluded patients with altered coagulation profile, anemia, thrombocytopenia, hypertension,
gestational diabetes and cholestasis. Final analysis compared fibrinogen levels in non-PPH and PPH subjects
(n=40 each). Results: The serum fibrinogen levels in non-PPH was 2.80±0.55g/L and in PPH group was
1.07±0.48g/L (p<0.001). Correlation of predelivery fibrinogen and blood loss among subjects predicted a
negative correlation (r = −0.695, p<0.001). There were no PPH cases when serum fibrinogen level was >2.63g/L
(sensitivity 82.5%, specificity 100%). Conclusions: Prenatal serum fibrinogen level above 2.6g/L is suggested
as potential alert marker for maternal well being (with non-PPH) in vaginal delivery.
Keywords: Fibrinogen, pregnancy, blood loss, PPH.
Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) remains one of the
foremost causes of maternal mortality and morbidity
throughout the world. Looking to the growing awareness
of haemostatic challenges in pregnant patients, serum
fibrinogen is one of the key hematological parameters
being investigated in relation to PPH.1-7 Fibrinogen
functions by activating platelet aggregation and initiating
fibrin polymerization. Fibrinogen levels increase with
advancing pregnancy probably because of increase in
estrogen levels.1 Fibrinogen decreases in PPH indicating
derangements in coagulation pathways.
Previous studies investigated serum fibrinogen and
PPH to establish 2-4 or refute a prediction model between
them 3, 5-7. The evidence for either hypothesis has
remained weak because of conflicting findings. We
questioned whether a pregnancy specific trigger/
hormonal disturbance influence both uterus tone and
hemostasis of terminal pregnancy. For PPH subjects with
atonic uterus, the fibrinogen levels will then be lowered
predelivery. In subjects where PPH is not present, the
fibrinogen levels will maintain a specific threshold level.
We devised this comparative study between predelivery
serum fibrinogen levels in vaginal delivery without PPH
and with PPH. We hypothesized that predelivery serum
Received: 10th September 2019. Accepted: 18th November 2019.
Agarwal R, Jaiswal N, Kar R, Singh A, Srivastava H. Is serum fibrinogen an affirmative marker for vaginal delivery without
PPH. The New Indian Journal of OBGYN. 2020; 6(2): 113-8.
The New Indian Journal of OBGYN. 2020 (January-June); 6(2)
fibrinogen be used as positive alert marker for maternal
well being and a conception ending with ‘physiological’
blood loss rather than envisage a PPH.
Methods
The study was conducted in tertiary health care
institution of a low income Indian subcontinent country in
joint collaboration with Department of Obstetrics and
Gynecology and Department of Biochemistry from
November 2016 to April 2018. Institutional Ethical
clearance and informed patient consent was obtained for
the study.
Sample size estimation
In a study by Niepraschk-von Dollen et al, predelivery
fibrinogen in severe PPH and without severe PPH, there
was a standard deviation of fibrinogen level i.e. 0.75 g/L
in control group and 0.8 g/L in severe PPH.2 Considering
α = 5% and power = 80% to estimate a difference of 0.8
units in fibrinogen levels, minimum sample of 15 cases
were required in each group.2 As prevalence of severe
PPH in our hospital and other studies is around 3% of
vaginal deliveries, for minimum 15 cases of severe PPH,
we needed 500 subjects for the study.2
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
For study enrolment, we included low-risk pregnant
women between age group 18-40 years presenting with
singleton pregnancy after 24 weeks of gestation. We
excluded patients with possible obstetric risks (altered
coagulation profile, hemoglobin <10 g/dl or
thrombocytopenia (<105/mm3), hypertension, gestational
diabetes and cholestasis. Predelivery blood samples were
collected in these subjects on admission to the delivery
suite when they presented with spontaneous labour and
preserved for biochemical analysis. The subjects were
then followed prospectively for spontaneous vaginal
delivery. Patients requiring induction of delivery,
instrumental or surgical delivery, with placental abruption
or previa, with significant genital tract trauma or requiring
manual removal of placenta were further excluded. A total
of 453 subjects underwent spontaneous vaginal delivery
and were eligible for fibrinogen estimation (figure 1). Due
to limitation of financial resources, fibrinogen was finally
estimated in 40 consecutive patients with PPH (rate
limiting parameter) and equal number of non-PPH
deliveries (random selection by computer generated
numbers).
114
Blood loss estimation
The blood loss at delivery was measured using an
impermeable collection bag placed under the patient’s
buttock and blood loss measurement was done by using a
graduated jar (episiotomy was packed separately).
Further, any sponges if used, were weighed separately
using weighing scale and corresponding blood loss added.
According to blood loss estimated, subjects were divided
into three delivery groups (WHO definition)8:
Non-PPH: Subjects with blood loss <500ml.
Mild PPH: Cases with atonic PPH 500ml and
1000ml.
Severe PPH: Cases with atonic PPH >1000ml with
sign and symptoms of shock.
All the subjects were followed up intensively and PPH
was managed as per established hospital standard
treatment protocols.
Method of serum fibrinogen estimation
2 ml of blood collected in a plain vial was allowed to
clot. It was then centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 5 minutes.
The supernatant serum was divided into two aliquots in
Eppendorf fuses and stored at -700C for further analysis.
Estimation of serum fibrinogen was done using ELISA
kit.
Statistical analysis
Normality of the data was ensured using Levene’s
variance test. All quantitative parameters were expressed
as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Non-PPH versus PPH
fibrinogen levels and mild versus severe PPH were
compared using unpaired student t test. A p ≤0.05 was
considered significant. Fibrinogen levels and association
with blood loss was determined using logistic re (...truncated)