The Impact of Olfactory Dysfunction on the Psychological Status and Quality of Life of Patients with Nasal Obstruction and Septal Deviation
THIEME
Original Research
The Impact of Olfactory Dysfunction on the
Psychological Status and Quality of Life of Patients
with Nasal Obstruction and Septal Deviation
Konstantinos Valsamidis1
Athanasia Printza1
1 1st Otolaryngology Department, Medical school, Aristotle
University of Thessaloniki, AHEPA Hospital, 54124, Thessaloniki,
Greece
Jannis Constantinidis1
Stefanos Triaridis1
Address for correspondence Stefanos Triaridis MD, MsC, PhD, 1st
Otolaryngology Department, Medical school, Aristotle University of
Thessaloniki, AHEPA Hospital, 54124, Thessaloniki, Greece
(e-mail: ).
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2020;24(2):e237–e246.
Abstract
Keywords
► olfactory dysfunction
► septoplasty
► anxiety
► emotional status
► quality of life
► olfaction test
received
August 5, 2019
accepted
December 3, 2019
published online
February 27, 2020
Introduction Olfactory dysfunction may be present in patients with nasal obstruction
and septal deviation. The impact of olfactory dysfunction on the psychological profile
and quality of life (QoL) of these patients remains unexplored.
Objective The present study aimed to investigate the emotional status and QoL of
patients with olfactory dysfunction and septal deviation and to identify predictors
associated with clinically significant improvement of psychological status and QoL,
focusing mainly on the role of olfactory recovery after septoplasty.
Methods The olfactory function was quantitatively assessed using the ‘‘Sniffin’
sticks’’ test (Burghart Messtechnik GmbH, Wedel, Germany) in 60 patients and 25
controls enrolled in this prospective study. The participants completed validated
questionnaires specific for general health (Short Form-36), nasal-symptom related
QoL (SinoNasal Outcome Test-22), olfaction-associated QoL (Questionnaire of Olfactory Deficits) and for assessing their psychological state (Short Anxiety Screening Test
and Beck Depression Inventory) preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively. The
patients used the Glasgow Benefit Inventory to evaluate their personal benefit after
septoplasty with.
Results Septoplasty led to significantly improved olfactory function. Patients with
olfactory impairment had significantly lower nasal-symptom related QoL, higher stress
levels, and more depressive mood compared with normosmics and controls before and
after septoplasty. Postoperatively, personal benefit from surgery was higher in
normosmic patients. Improvement of nasal-symptom related QoL was significantly
associated with higher likelihood of clinically significant improvement of patients’
psychological profile and more personal benefit from surgery. Olfactory dysfunction
was negatively correlated with the emotional status of the patients.
Conclusion Olfactory dysfunction appears to significantly affect the psychological
status of patients with nasal obstruction, and olfactory recovery improves the patients’
perception of personal benefit from septoplasty.
DOI https://doi.org/
10.1055/s-0040-1701269.
ISSN 1809-9777.
Copyright © 2020 by Thieme Revinter
Publicações Ltda, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
237
238
The Impact of Olfactory Dysfunction on Psychological Status and Quality of Life
Introduction
Olfactory dysfunction due to decreased nasal airflow is a
common symptom among patients with nasal obstruction
related to nasal septal deviation.1 Olfactory disorders may
have a significant negative impact on different areas of daily
life, including food appreciation, safety (detection of environmental hazards, such as smoke, fire, gas, and spoiled
food), personal hygiene, and social communication. Especially in the case of individuals whose professions depend
on a well-functioning sense of smell, such as cooks, wine
tasters, perfumers, or firemen, olfactory deficits can be
catastrophic.2 Therefore, olfactory impairment due to septal
deviation, although underestimated by patients and overlooked by doctors,3 may substantially affect the quality of
life (QoL) of patients and potentially be associated to mental
health.2,4–6 Nasal septoplasty is the standard treatment of
nasal septal deviation because it usually produces an
improvement of nasal airflow and resolution of nasal
obstruction symptoms.7–10 To date, there are a few studies
evaluating the effects of septal surgery on olfactory function.1,11–18 However, the impact of olfactory impairment
due to septal deviation on the nasal-symptom related and
general QoL of the patients has not been adequately
addressed in the literature. In addition, although there are
studies investigating predictive factors for QoL outcomes
after septoplasty,19–25 there is no data available to the
relevance of the olfactory function specifically to patients’
psychological status (anxiety and depression symptoms)
and its effect on their satisfaction with the surgical
procedure and postoperative QoL recovery. The use of
standardized olfactory tests, validated olfaction-specific
questionnaires, and mental health psychometric instruments allows a clearer delineation of the psychological
profile and evaluation of olfaction of the patients as a codeterminant for QoL and emotional status after septoplasty.
The clinical importance is that these data may enable
otorhinolaryngologists to better assess their patients and
inform them about the anticipated benefit for their QoL
after septoplasty.
The aim of the present prospective study was to assess the
emotional status and QoL outcomes of patients with olfactory
dysfunction and nasal obstruction symptoms who undergo
septoplasty. Additionally, the study explored differences in
QoL and psychological status between normosmic patients
and those with olfactory deficits and investigated the prognostic value of demographic and clinical characteristics for
clinically significant improvement of QoL, anxiety symptoms,
and emotional status of patients with olfactory dysfunction.
Materials and Methods
This was a prospective observational study. Sixty adult
patients with nasal obstruction due to nasal septal deviation
were studied. The diagnosis of septal deviation was established
based on clinical examination and nasal endoscopy. Twentyfive healthy individuals, who had neither nasal obstruction nor
septal deviation, were recruited as controls. All the enrolled
International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology
Vol. 24
No. 2/2020
Valsamidis et al.
participants signed the informed consent. The study protocol
was performed according to the Declaration of Helsinki and
was approved by the local institutional review board (decision
no 3525/10.02.2016).
Adult patients younger than 65 years with nasal septal
deviation, diagnosed by means of clinical examination and
presence of symptoms of nasal obstruction for at least
6 months, were included in the study. Patients were excluded
if they met any of the exclusion criteria, such as chronic
rhinosinusitis, with or without nasal polyposis; allergic rhinitis; previous nasal surgical procedure; sinonasal malignancy;
perforation of the nasal septum; nasal valve collapse; cr (...truncated)