A systematic concept analysis of ‘technology dependent’: challenging the terminology
European Journal of Pediatrics
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-020-03737-x
REVIEW
A systematic concept analysis of ‘technology dependent’:
challenging the terminology
Maria Brenner 1 & Denise Alexander 1 & Mary Brigid Quirke 1 & Jessica Eustace-Cook 2 & Piet Leroy 3 & Jay Berry 4 &
Martina Healy 5,6 & Carmel Doyle 1 & Kate Masterson 1,7
Received: 5 May 2020 / Revised: 22 June 2020 / Accepted: 9 July 2020
# The Author(s) 2020
Abstract
There are an increasing number of children who are dependent on medical technology to sustain their lives. Although significant
research on this issue is taking place, the terminology used is variable and the concept of technology dependence is ill-defined. A
systematic concept analysis was conducted examining the attributes, antecedents, and consequences of the concept of technology
dependent, as portrayed in the literature. We found that this concept refers to a wide range of clinical technology to support
biological functioning across a dependency continuum, for a range of clinical conditions. It is commonly initiated within a
complex biopsychosocial context and has wide ranging sequelae for the child and family, and health and social care delivery.
Conclusion: The term technology dependent is increasingly redundant. It objectifies a heterogenous group of children who are
assisted by a myriad of technology and who adapt to, and function with, this assistance in numerous ways.
What is Known:
• There are an increasing number of children who require medical technology to sustain their life, commonly referred to as technology dependent. This
concept analysis critically analyses the relevance of the term technology dependent which is in use for over 30 years.
What is New:
• Technology dependency refers to a wide range of clinical technology to support biological functioning across a dependency continuum, for a range of
clinical conditions. It is commonly initiated within a complex biopsychosocial context and has wide-ranging sequelae for the child and family, and
health and social care delivery.
• This term is increasingly redundant and does not serve the heterogenous group of children who are assisted by a myriad of technology and who adapt
to, and function with, this assistance in numerous ways. More appropriate child-centred terminology will be determined within the TechChild project.
Keywords Child . Complex needs . Concept analysis . Family . Technology dependence
Communicated by Daniele De Luca
* Maria Brenner
Jay Berry
Denise Alexander
Martina Healy
Mary Brigid Quirke
Carmel Doyle
Jessica Eustace-Cook
Piet Leroy
Kate Masterson
Extended author information available on the last page of the article
Eur J Pediatr
Abbreviations
ICD
Implantable cardioverter defibrillators
HRQoL Health-related quality of life
PICU
Paediatric intensive care unit
Introduction
There are an increasing number of children who require medical technology to sustain their life [1–4] and, in response, an
expanding array of medical technology available. This paper
analyses the concept of ‘technology dependent’, the term
commonly used to refer to these children. The current prevalence and rate of increase in the number of children who are
technology dependent is difficult to determine as they depend
on a number of interrelated factors including: the prevalence
of particular conditions; medical and surgical interventions
chosen; and finance and policies for care delivery across and
within countries [5–7]. The term technology dependent stems
primarily from the phrase ‘technology dependence’ which
was coined 30 years ago by the Office of Technology
Assessment (US) [8], describing ‘a medical device to compensate for the loss of a vital body function and substantial ongoing nursing care to avert death or further disability’. To the
best of our knowledge, this is the first systematic concept
analysis to examine the contemporary relevance and utility
of this terminology as it is currently portrayed in the literature.
This is important for two key reasons: the array of medical
technology now available means that the broad term of ‘technology dependent’ has the potential to conjure up a multitude
of clinical scenarios; and the objectifying nomenclature does
not reflect a child-centric approach. This paper is part of a
larger body of research, the TechChild project, funded by
the European Research Council. The purpose of this research
is to explore influences on the initiation of technology dependence required to sustain a child’s life and to identify more
appropriate child-centred terminology in an evidenced-based
manner.
An evolutionary concept analysis was employed as it seeks
to examine the cluster of key characteristics that through common use, collectively form the real definition of a concept [9].
According to Rodgers [9], it is necessary to understand the
antecedents (phenomena usually found prior to concept occurrence), the attributes of the concept, and the consequences that
follow as a result. Without a clear conceptual foundation, there
is an ambiguity which in turn can compromise the quality of
research or theory construction as the area develops [10].
Methods
Rodgers’ evolutionary method [9] was used to systematically
analyse the concept of technology dependence in the scientific
literature. This method is particularly well suited to this issue
given the changing and dynamic nature of advances in medical technology. Alternative approaches to concept analysis
are founded in a realist paradigm, in which a reductionist
approach focuses on defining a concept as a static entity.
Rodgers’ relativist stance, in comparison, seeks to identify
how a concept is portrayed in the literature using an inductive
approach, while acknowledging that any understanding of a
concept is evolutionary as it is influenced by dynamic contextual factors, which may be disciplinary, cultural, or theoretical
[9]. Rodgers’ approach to concept analysis includes a set of
core activities, which can be carried out simultaneously and
not necessarily in a linear manner (Table 1). Analysis seeks to
identify what is common, the purpose of which is to identify
data that is relevant to the attributes of the concept and its
contextual features. Thematic analysis identifies major themes
presented in the literature.
Data sources and search strategy
A three-strand approach was used to create a systematic
search. An initial scoping search was run in PubMed and
CINAHL to identify appropriate control language using
MeSH and CINAHL headings. Control language is the language of the topic established at the start of a systematic
search, against which other terms which emerge are mapped
against. This includes developing a list of synonyms and consideration of reference and non-reference words for the search.
A secondary scoping search was then conducted identifying
appropriate keywords related to the following: technology dependence, technology dependent, complex care needs, complex medica (...truncated)