Alt Labor? Why We Still Need Traditional Labor

Chicago-Kent Law Review Volume 95 Issue 1 The State of the Law of the New Labor Movement Article 42 9-15-2020 Alt Labor? Why We Still Need Traditional Labor Martin H. Malin Chicago-Kent College of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview Part of the Labor and Employment Law Commons Recommended Citation Martin H. Malin, Alt Labor? Why We Still Need Traditional Labor, 95 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 157 (2020). Available at: https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview/vol95/iss1/42 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons @ IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Chicago-Kent Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarly Commons @ IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. For more information, please contact , . 42394-ckt_95-1 Sheet No. 83 Side A 06/12/2020 13:18:38 7 MALIN MACRO 1 EIC 5.5 (DO NOT DELETE) 5/8/2020 10:43 PM ALT LABOR? WHY WE STILL NEED TRADITIONAL LABOR MARTIN H. MALIN * INTRODUCTION The United States’ workplace is characterized by income inequality, and there is strong evidence that the decline of collective bargaining has played a significant role in that phenomenon. 1 There is also strong evidence that U.S. workers are experiencing a significant voice gap, i.e., a significant difference between the level of influence they believe they should have with respect to conditions at their workplaces and the level of influence they actually do have.2 In a major study of workers’ perceptions of their jobs, only 40% reported they were in good jobs, where job quality was measured by ten characteristics that employees generally cite as qualities they desire in their jobs. 3 Of course, union representation and collective bargaining have been the traditional methods for providing workers a voice in their workplaces and improving the quality of their jobs. As the percentage of American workers represented by labor unions has steadily declined, 4 attention has turned to alternatives to traditional unions and collective bargaining. Labor Educator Steven Ashby describes the development: 157 06/12/2020 13:18:38 * Professor and Co-director, Institute for Law and the Workplace, Chicago-Kent College of Law, Illinois Institute of Technology. I gratefully acknowledge helpful comments from Robert Bruno and Céasar Rosado Marzán, and helpful research assistance from Chicago-Kent reference librarian Mandy Lee. 1. See Bruce Western & Jake Rosenfeld, Unions, Norms and the Rise in U.S. Wage Inequality, 76 AM. SOC. REV. 513, 513 (2011). 2. Thomas A. Kochan et al., Worker Voice in America: Is There a Gap between What Workers Expect and What They Experience?, 72 INDUS. & LAB. REL. REV. 3, 3 (2019). 3. JONATHAN ROTHWELL & STEVEN CRABTREE, NOT JUST A JOB: NEW EVIDENCE ON THE QUALITY OF WORK IN THE UNITED STATES (2019), https://www.gallup.com/file/education/267650/Not %20Just%20a%20Job%20New%20Evidence%20on%20the%20Quality%20of%20Work%20in%20the %20United%20States.pdf [https://perma.cc/2KP6-8TUC]. 4. In 2018, 10.5% of the wage and salaried workforce were members of unions and 11.7% were represented by unions, down by 0.2% from 2017. BUREAU OF LABOR STATS., NEWS RELEASE, U.S. DEP’T LABOR, https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/union2.pdf [https://perma.cc/XJ79-7CDZ]. Union density peaked at around 35% in 1945 and has declined ever since. See Kochan, supra note 2, at 4. 42394-ckt_95-1 Sheet No. 83 Side A As traditional unions have increasingly come under attack over the past several decades, new organizations labeled “alt labor” have emerged – workers’ rights organizations that have similar goals but different struc- 42394-ckt_95-1 Sheet No. 83 Side B 06/12/2020 13:18:38 7 MALIN MACRO 1 EIC 5.5 (DO NOT DELETE) 158 CHICAGO-KENT LAW REVIEW 5/8/2020 10:43 PM [Vol 95:1 tures and methods than organized labor. At the core of alt-labor are more than two hundred worker centers, which have been active for more than two decades championing the rights of mostly immigrant workers and launching a national conversation about wage theft and how to fight it. Other alt-labor formations include labor-community coalitions, immigrant community-based workers’ organizations, faith-based worker rights organizations, and worker-based racial civil rights organizations. As well, the Fight for Fifteen movement, while funded and staffed by a traditional union (the Service Employees International Union), has built a low-wage worker movement that embodies the characteristics and tactics of alt-labor groups. 5 Indeed, it appears that many have simply given up on traditional business unionism and collective bargaining. Labor economist Richard Freeman, coauthor of the enormously influential What Do Unions Do?, has written: The starting point for any realistic assessment of what labor organizations can do for American workers is recognition that the traditional union model of organizing workers through representation elections and bargaining collectively with management has reached a dead end. With private-sector union density in single digits and falling and public sector collective bargaining under attack, the only sensible answer to this chapter’s title question [what can labor organizations do for U.S. workers when unions can’t do what unions used to do?] is that unions will not accomplish much unless they find ways to have an impact on economic outcomes outside of collective bargaining. 6 06/12/2020 13:18:38 5. Steven Ashby, “Traditional” and “Alt” Labor: Comparisons, Critiques and Perspectives, 43 LAB. STUDIES J. 101, 101 (2018). 6. Richard B, Freeman, What Can Labor Organizations Do for U.S. Workers When Unions Can’t Do What They Used to Do?, in WHAT WORKS FOR WORKERS? PUBLIC POLICIES AND INNOVATIVE STRATEGIES FOR LOW-WAGE WORKERS 50, 50 (Stephanie Luce et al. eds. 2014). 7. JONATHAN ROSENBLUM, BEYOND $15: IMMIGRANT WORKERS, FAITH ACTIVISTS, AND THE REVIVAL OF THE LABOR MOVEMENT 174 (2017). 8. Id. at 174–75. 42394-ckt_95-1 Sheet No. 83 Side B Similarly, Jonathan Rosenblum, who served as director of SEIU’s Sea-Tac Airport campaign, the first successful action to gain a $15 per hour minimum wage, has written that “the union movement as it currently exists isn’t capable of building and sustaining the kind of power needed in today’s economic and political reality.”7 Rosenblum cites four reasons for his dire analysis: the continuing decline in union density, the limited vision and outmoded structure of the business unionism model, a collective bargaining model that no longer meets the needs of a growing portion of the workforce, and narrow union focus limited to workplace issues. 8 Labor Law scholars Marion Crain and Ken Matheny reacted to the Supreme Court’s 42394-ckt_95-1 Sheet No. 84 Side A 06/12/2020 13:18:38 7 MALIN MACRO 1 EIC 5.5 (DO NOT DELETE) 2020] 5/8/2020 10:43 PM ALT LABOR? 159 decision in Janus v. AFSCME Council 319 by calling for the rejection of the traditional model o (...truncated)