Investigating the Quality of Commercial Beef Cattle Feeds and Feed Ingredients Used in Bangladesh
SAARC J. Agric., 18(1): 197-208 (2020)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/sja.v18i1.48393
Research Article
INVESTIGATING THE QUALITY OF COMMERCIAL
BEEF CATTLE FEEDS AND FEED INGREDIENTS
USED IN BANGLADESH
M.T. Kamal1, M.A. Hashem1*, M. Al-Mamun2, M.M. Hossain1
M.A. Razzaque3 and J.H. Ritu1
1
Department of Animal Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University
Mymensingh-2202, Bangladesh.
2
Department of Animal Nutrition, Bangladesh Agricultural University
Mymensingh-2202, Bangladesh.
3
Desert Agriculture and Ecosystem Program, Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research
Safat 13109, Kuwait
ABSTRACT
The study was undertaken to evaluate the quality of commercial beef
cattle feed and feed ingredients which are available in Bangladesh. For
this purpose, chemical analysis and in vitro digestibility (IVD) were
estimated for nine commercial feeds and different feed ingredients which
were collected from different regions. Chemical analysis of samples was
carried out in triplicate for dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP), crude
fiber (CF), ether extract (EE), ash, acid detergent fiber (ADF) and neutral
detergent fiber (NDF) content. Metabolizable energy (ME) was
calculated mathematically for feed samples by using standard formula.
The analysis revealed the difference between the manufacturer’s claim
and actual analyzed value. In commercial feeds DM content ranged from
90-92%. While CP content of commercial feeds was either lower or
higher than the written value of feed industries. In Provita feed CP
content (20.72%) was higher and Care feed had much lower CP content
(7.54%) than written value. In vitro digestibility of DM in feed ingredients
varied from 18.27 in straw to 75.77% in soybean meal. The fiber
component (NDF and ADF) was negatively correlated with IVDMD and
CP was positively correlated with IVDMD because fiber rich components
were less digestible than the non-fibrous component (protein). Analysis
of commercial feed samples revealed that the values claimed by the
manufacturers are quite different from the actual analyzed values. This is
a matter of concern and needs to be checked through better quality
control measures by systematic feed analysis and ensure that
manufacturers declare the true composition of the marketed feeds.
Keyword: Beef cattle feed, Quality, Chemical analysis, In vitro
digestibility (IVD)
*
Corresponding author:
Received: 27.04.2020
Accepted: 10.06.2020
198
Kamal et al.
INTRODUCTION
In Bangladesh, livestock sector is one of the major components of agricultural
activities and plays a crucial role in economic development by ensuring food security
and stimulating the growth of a number of subsidiary industries (Goutam et al.,
2017). Approximately 64% of the livestock farmers practiced fattening round the
year and rest of the farmers followed fattening for period of 3 months; before Eid-ulAdha (Kamal et al., 2019). Malpractice of feed adulteration and use of waste
contaminated feeds are common practices in Bangladesh. Feed shortage is the main
reason for low productivity of livestock in Bangladesh (Rahman et al., 1998; Baset et
al., 2003; Jahan et al., 2018) and at the same time farmers are not able to formulate a
balanced ration leading to loss of productivity. To fulfill the requirement of farmer
for concentrate feed, commercial feed industries are marketing the branded feeds to
cater the market demand. Ideally the role of these industries should be to provide
high quality livestock feeds to enhance production by meeting the nutrient
requirements of livestock in different stages of growth or production. The recognized
feed mills (ACI Godrej, Lal Teer, Care, Gain, Index, Soudia feed, Provita feed etc.)
as a marketing strategy display various essential nutrients percentage on the feed
package to attract/deceive the farmers. So, a question arises whether the animal feed
industries maintain the composition accurately in the feed as mentioned in the
package and the feed is free from harmful objects or they attempt to mislead the
consumer. Misleading information in the nutritional profile of feed provided by the
suppliers erodes the consumer confidence and loss of productivity.
The farmers are faced with multiple challenges regarding the poor and inconsistent
quality of commercial feeds, limited capital, and insufficient knowledge of nutritive
value of commercial feeds (Laswai and Nandonde, 2013). Commercial feed
producers tend to sell their feed by exaggerating the nutritional profile of the feed
leading to poor production performance of livestock and loss to the farmers. This
practice challenges the reliability of commercial feed quality besides effecting the
safety of feed in cattle.
It is beyond the scope of this research to provide a detailed explanation of nutritional
value of manufactured cattle feed and feed ingredients, especially because this is a
very specific subject area. Current research will lead to better understanding of the
chemical composition of the commercial feeds for beef cattle. Findings of the present
study will help the farmers of Bangladesh in understanding the quality of the
purchased commercial feeds leading to better feeding. An ideal combination of
ingredients in compounded feed ensures rational use of available resources while
meeting the nutritional requirements of the animal. So, the approach of compounded
feed can be an economic attempt for better feed production as well as increasing
productivity and nutritional status of livestock. The ultimate goal of feed analysis is
to assess the quality of beef cattle feed through nutrient composition.
QUALITY EVALUATION OF COMMERCIAL BEEF CATTLE FEEDS
199
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Experimental site
The experiment was conducted at Department of Animal Science laboratory and
Animal Nutrition Laboratory, BAU, Mymensingh.
Collection of samples
Nine (9) manufactured beef cattle feed samples (8 concentrate and a total mixed
ration) and eleven (11) feed ingredients were collected from different commercial
feed mills and feed dealers of Bangladesh. It is important that samples are true
representative of the whole that reflects of what livestock farmers are buying. Oven
dried samples were ground in a grinding machine (Cyclotec sample mill Tecator,
Sweden) by using 1.0 mm sieve for chemical analysis. The ground samples in three
replicates of around 250g each were kept in air tight zip lock bag for further chemical
analysis.
Feed quality (nutritive value) analyses: The samples were analyzed for proximate
analysis such as DM (Dry matter), CP (Crude protein) and ash following the method
of AOAC (2005). All determination was done in triplicate and the mean value was
reported. Acid detergent fiber (ADF) and Neutral detergent fiber (NDF) were
determined by following the procedures of Goering and Van Soest (1970).
In-vitro study
An in-vitro study was conducted to determine the organic matter digestibility (OMD)
and metabolizable energy (ME) contents of feedstuffs according to the methods of
Menke (...truncated)