The role of two different training systems in affecting carbon sequestration capability in hazelnut orchards
Energ. Ecol. Environ.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40974-020-00202-1
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
The role of two different training systems in affecting carbon
sequestration capability in hazelnut orchards
Mirko U. Granata1
1
•
Rosangela Catoni1
•
Francesco Bracco1
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Pavia, Via S. Epifanio 14, 27100 Pavia, Italy
Received: 8 June 2020 / Revised: 27 October 2020 / Accepted: 28 October 2020
The Author(s) 2020
Abstract As a part of a larger study concerning the carbon
sequestration capability by hazelnut orchards in Italy, we
analyzed the total amount of carbon dioxide (CO2)
removed over the year from the atmosphere through the net
assimilation rates in two hazelnut orchards in Piedmont
(i.e., the second region in Italy for surface and production).
In particular, considering the key role played by the
structural traits in affecting carbon sequestration potential,
we assessed the impact of two different training systems
widely diffused in the region: single trunk in orchardA and
bush-like in orchardB. The results showed that plants in
orchardA and orchardB sequestered 10.6 ± 1.8 and
25.7 ± 4.2 kg (CO2) plant-1 month-1, respectively.
Higher CO2 sequestration in the plants in orchardB was due
to their higher leaf area index relative to plants in orchardA.
The mean CO2 sequestration from orchardA and orchardB
per area was 4.25 ± 1.72 and 8.57 ± 3.41 Mg (CO2)
ha-1 month-1, respectively. We also estimated the total
amount of CO2 emission by the management over the
entire production season in 157.335 kg CO2eq ha-1 by
summing the contribution of diesel fuel, machinery and
fertilization practices and considering that the total amount
of CO2 sequestered by the two hazelnut orchards over the
entire study period was estimated in 26 Mg (CO2) ha-1 in
orchardA, and in 51 Mg (CO2) ha-1 in orchardB, they had
an effective positive role as carbon sink at this local level.
Keywords Hazelnut orchard Training systems Carbon
sequestration Leaf area index
& Rosangela Catoni
1 Introduction
In the scenario of expected climatic change (temperature
increases and water deficits) related to the greenhouse
effect, there has been an increasing interest on the carbon
(C) cycle in terrestrial ecosystems (Don et al. 2012). The
global warming is now clearly recognized as a major threat
to natural and socioeconomic systems, and the global
community is searching for cost-effective ways to slow the
build-up of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations and minimize its impact (Kirschbaum 2006). The
Kyoto protocol to the United Nations framework convention on climate change (1997) establishes the principle that
carbon sequestration can be used by participating nations to
help meet their respective net emission reduction targets
for carbon dioxide (CO2) and other greenhouse gases. In
fact, by sequestering a large amount of atmospheric C,
terrestrial ecosystems are thought to offer a mitigation
strategy for reducing global warming (Schimel et al. 2001).
Specifically, the Article 3.4 of the Kyoto Protocol recommended, among the allowed activities, forest management,
cropland management, grazing land management and revegetation (Smith 2004). In particular, among the cropland
context, orchards in comparison with annual crops have
structural characteristic allowing them to sequester significant quantities of atmospheric C for longer periods with
smaller annual fluctuations (Smaje 2015). This different
performance of the orchards is due to, on the one hand,
their long life cycle, which allows them to accumulate C in
permanent organs such as trunk, branches and roots and in
the soil through rhizo-deposition and, on the other hand, to
a low or null soil tillage, which preserves soil organic
matter from mineralization (Scandellari et al. 2016). Nevertheless, in spite of the strategic role of orchards, their C
123
M. U. Granata et al.
potential has been only partially explored, with studies
conducted regarding olive (Nardino et al. 2013; Sofo et al.
2005), palm (Navarro et al. 2008), apple (Zanotelli et al.
2015), peach (Sofo et al. 2005) and pear (Zhang et al.
2013).
The landscape of Mediterranean region is largely dominated by orchards (Aguilera et al. 2015), and one of the
most widely diffused is represented by hazelnut orchard
(Corylus avellana L). Among the Mediterranean region,
Italy is one of the major hazelnut productions worldwide,
being second only to Turkey. In Italy, the hazelnut production surface is located mainly in four regions: Lazio,
Piedmont, Campania and Sicily, covering 98% of the entire
Italian production area (Istat 2019).
The present work is part of a larger study on the carbon
sequestration capability of hazelnut orchards, which first
covered orchards in Lazio region, with data that have been
extended to include the nearby Campania region (Granata
et al. 2020). The current study is focalized on the role of
carbon sinks in hazelnut orchards in Piedmont, that based
on the latest updates on the surface devoted to this culture,
ranks as the second region in Italy for surface and production (24,555 ha and 39,997 tons, respectively, data from
Istat 2019). In Piedmont, the hazelnut cultivation became
really important and expanded in the late 1980s (Godone
et al. 2014). Over time, there has been a significant increase
in hazelnut surfaces in Piedmont, with a stronger trend than
in the rest of Italy which reflects an increased interest of
landowners toward hazelnut and its economical potential
(Valentini and Me 2002). In particular, the nut production
is based on a single cultivar ‘tonda gentile delle Langhe,’
selected directly by farmers for its good environmental
adaptability to Piedmont climate and for the excellent
quality of the kernel (Valentini et al. 2014). In Piedmont,
the traditional cultivation of this cultivar expects different
training systems in open forms such as the bush or single
trunk. In both cases, choosing the right distance between
plants is necessary to ensure adequate ventilation and
lighting as well as allowing the mechanized cultivation
practices such as pruning and harvesting. Thus, based on
the soil fertility, water availability and the training systems,
the planting distance inside the hazelnut orchards may vary
from 5 9 4 m (plant density 500 plants ha-1) to 6 9 6 m
(plant density 278 plants ha-1) (Comunità Montana Alta
Langa, 2009). The aim of this work was to analyze the CO2
sequestration capability of mature hazelnut orchards in
Piedmont in two areas where hazelnut plants were subjected to two different training systems (bush vs single
trunk), but similar in terms of plants densities (333 vs 400
plants ha-1). The objectives of the study were 1) to compare the CO2 sequestration in the two orchards with respect
to the different training systems, 2) to measure the seasonal
pattern of CO2 sequestration during the year and 3) to
123
contextualize the obtain CO2 sequestration capability in the
Italian sc (...truncated)