Importance of Facial Plastic Surgery Education in Residency: A Resident Survey
THIEME
278
Original Research
Importance of Facial Plastic Surgery Education in
Residency: A Resident Survey
Steven A. Curti1
J. Randall Jordan1
1 Department of Otolaryngology, University of Mississippi Medical
Center, Jackson, Mississippi, United States
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2020;24(3):278–281.
Abstract
Keywords
► facial plastic surgery
► residency
► survey
► education
Introduction Facial plastic and reconstructive surgery (FPRS) is a key part of the
curriculum for otolaryngology residents. It is important to gain an understanding of the
breadth of exposure and level of competence residents feel with these concepts during
their residency.
Objective To determine the level of FPRS exposure and training otolaryngology
residents receive during their residency.
Methods A survey was emailed to all Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical
Education (ACGME) accredited otolaryngology residents. The survey aimed to find the
level of exposure to FPRS procedures otolaryngology residents get and how confident
they feel with their training in cosmetic FPRS.
Results A total of 213 residents responded to the survey for an overall response rate
of 13.4%. There was an even mixture of residents from all postgraduate year (PGY)
levels, with 58% of respondents being male. Almost all (98%) of the residents felt FPRS
was important to otolaryngology residency training. Exposure to procedures varied
with 57% performing or assisting with cosmetic minor procedures, 81% performing or
assisting with cosmetic major procedures, and 93% performing or assisting with
reconstructive procedures. Only 49% of residents felt their programs either very or
somewhat adequately prepared them in cosmetic facial plastic surgery.
Conclusion There was a wide variability in the FPRS procedure exposure. Most
residents felt procedures were a vital part of otolaryngology residency training, but
not all were able to participate in them. Only half of the residents felt well-prepared in
cosmetic procedures.
Introduction
Facial plastic and reconstructive surgery (FPRS) is a broad field
encompassing both aesthetic and reconstructive surgery. All
aspects of FPRS are important in the training of otolaryngology
residents. These authors have sensed a variation in the level of
training for facial plastic and reconstructive surgery, and in
particular cosmetic procedures while in residency. In 2017,
there were > 17.5 million cosmetic procedures performed in
the United States, a number that continues to grow. There are
received
April 14, 2019
accepted
September 17, 2019
published online
December 13, 2019
Address for correspondence Steven A. Curti, MD, Department of
Otolaryngology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 North
State Street, Jackson, MS 39216, United States
(e-mail: ).
DOI https://doi.org/
10.1055/s-0039-1700584.
ISSN 1809-9777.
well-known complications to these procedures and little to no
regulation of the practitioners who preform them.1 It is
apparent that there is a need for well-trained practitioners
in cosmetic procedures.
While there is significant overlap in the cosmetic surgery
world between different medical specialties, otolaryngologists
make up a large portion of specialists who perform facial
plastic surgery.1 Although a fellowship can improve the knowledge of facial plastic surgery with specific training, the interest
in facial plastic surgery procedures continues to rise among
Copyright © 2020 by Thieme Revinter
Publicações Ltda, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Facial Plastic Surgery Education in Residency
practicing otolaryngologists and residents in training.2–5 Facial
plastic surgery continues to be a mainstay in the core curriculum as specified by the American Board of Otolaryngology and
the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education
(ACGME) for otolaryngology residency training programs. In
the past few decades, there has been a call for an increase in the
facial plastic surgery curricula.6–8
Our goal was to assess the level of training that otolaryngology residents receive in FPRS, with an emphasis on
cosmetic surgery, across the United States. We used a survey,
sent out to residents at otolaryngology residency-training
programs, to help us assess how residents perceive their
training in FPRS.
Curti, Jordan
Program Directors and Residency Coordinators via list serve
email with the assistance of the Otolaryngology Program
Directors Organization. The Program Directors and Residency Coordinators were asked to forward to all residents.
Two separate reminder emails were subsequently sent out
during the three-week period that the survey was open,
each one week apart. The survey was open from October 8,
2018 to October 31, 2018. The study was exempted by the
Institutional Review Board. The goal of the survey was to
assess resident exposure to different aspects of facial plastic
surgery and their comfort with minor and major facial
plastic surgery procedures.
Results
Methods
3. Does your residency program have a facial plastic surgery
fellowship?
A total of 213 residents responded to the survey for a
response rate of 13.38% (213/1592). The basic demographic
information can be viewed in ►Table 2.
Over three fourths (82%) of the residents responded that
they feel cosmetic minor procedures (injections, lasers,
chemical peels, etc.) are either somewhat or very important
as part of otolaryngology residency training; however, 22%
(47/211) of the residents have no exposure to such procedures in their training, and another 21% (45/211) only have
the ability to observe these procedures. Out of the respondents that participate in minor cosmetic procedures, 29%
(61/211) serve in the role of assistant surgeon, and 28%
4. How many facial plastic surgery physicians are involved
with resident education at your program?
Table 2 Demographics of survey participants
A 15-question survey was created by the authors using
Qualtrics (www.qualtrics.com). The survey can be viewed in
►Table 1. The survey was sent to all United States Otolaryngology Head and Neck surgery residency program’s
Table 1 List of Survey Questions
1. Are you Male or Female?
2. What is your PGY level?
5. Do you have the opportunity to participate in cosmetic
minor procedures (injections, lasers, chemical peels, etc.)
during your residency training?
n (%)
Total responses
213 (100)
6. Which cosmetic minor procedures have you personally
administered? (Select all that apply)
Gender
7. Do you feel cosmetic minor procedures (injections, lasers,
chemical peels, etc.) are a vital part of otolaryngology
residency training?
Male
124 (58.2)
Female
89 (41.8)
PGY level
8. Do you have the opportunity to participate in cosmetic
major procedures (facelift, rhinoplasty, blepharoplasty,
etc.) during your residency training?
1
40 (18.8)
2
38 (17.8)
9. Do you feel that cosmetic major procedures (facelift,
rhinoplasty, blepharoplasty, etc.) are a vital part of
otolaryngology residency training?
3
42 (19.7)
4
48 (22.5)
5 (...truncated)