Evaluation and implementation of a mannequin-based surgical simulator for margin-involving eyelid laceration repair – a pilot study
Zhao et al. BMC Medical Education
(2021) 21:170
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02600-3
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Open Access
Evaluation and implementation of a
mannequin-based surgical simulator for
margin-involving eyelid laceration repair –
a pilot study
Jiawei Zhao1, Meleha Ahmad1, Emily W. Gower2, Roxana Fu3, Fasika A. Woreta1 and Shannath L. Merbs4*
Abstract
Background: Repair of margin-involving eyelid lacerations is a challenge for beginning ophthalmology residents,
yet no commercially-available simulation models exist for learning this skill. The objective of the study was to
modify a mannequin-based surgical simulator originally developed for trachomatous trichiasis surgery training to
teach margin-involving eyelid laceration repair and to evaluate its success within a residency wet-lab environment.
Methods: We modified a previously developed mannequin-based training system for trachomatous trichiasis
surgery into a simulator for margin-involving eyelid laceration repair. Six ophthalmology residents from a tertiary
care academic institution performed at least one simulated margin-involving eyelid laceration repair using the
surgical simulator between September 2019 and March 2020. Each session was video recorded. Two oculoplastic
surgeons reviewed the videos in a blinded fashion to assess surgical proficiency using a standardized grading
system. Participants were surveyed on their comfort level with eyelid laceration repair pre- and post-completion of
simulation. They were also queried on their perceived usefulness of the surgical simulator compared to past
methods and experiences.
Results: Six residents completed 11 simulation surgeries. For three residents who completed more than one
session, a slight increase in their skills assessment score and a decrease in operative time over two to three
simulation sessions were found. Self-reported comfort level with margin-involving eyelid laceration repairs was
significantly higher post-simulation compared to pre-simulation (p = 0.02). Residents ranked the usefulness of our
surgical simulator higher than past methods such as fruit peels, surgical skill boards, gloves, and pig feet (p = 0.03)
but lower than operating room experience (p = 0.02). Residents perceived the surgical simulator to be as useful as
cadaver head and emergency department/consult experience.
(Continued on next page)
* Correspondence:
4
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Maryland
School of Medicine, 419 W. Redwood St., Suite 420, Baltimore, MD 21201,
USA
Full list of author information is available at the end of the article
© The Author(s). 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License,
which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give
appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if
changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons
licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons
licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain
permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the
data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Zhao et al. BMC Medical Education
(2021) 21:170
Page 2 of 8
(Continued from previous page)
Conclusions: We developed a surgical simulator for teaching eyelid laceration repair and showed its utility in
developing trainees’ surgical skills. Our surgical simulator was rated to be as useful as a cadaver head but is more
readily available and cost effective.
Keywords: Surgical simulator, Resident education, Surgical training, Eyelid laceration repair, Oculoplastic surgery,
Ophthalmology
Background
Surgical training across multiple specialties, including
ophthalmology, has traditionally been based on an apprenticeship model, resulting in significant variability in
a trainee’s experience and exposure to different procedures. There has also been a decrease in resident autonomy as rules for ensuring patient safety have increased
[1]. A growing number of simulation-based models have
become available in ophthalmology allowing for the
training and assessment of procedural skills without associated patient risk [2, 3].
Eyelid lacerations associated with ocular and periocular trauma often occur outside of regular clinic
hours, when residents take primary call. Therefore, it
is important for an ophthalmology resident to be proficient at eyelid laceration repairs early during their
training. Eyelid laceration repair has been prioritized
as one of the top 10 procedures that should be practiced in a simulation-based manner to achieve proficiency before working with actual patients [4].
Lacerations involving the eyelid margin are particularly challenging to repair, and they require a complex, layered closure with several different suture
materials. Familiarity with the steps of the technique
and an appreciation for the feel of the tissues involved can help the ophthalmology resident achieve a
well-reconstructed eyelid that is both functional and
aesthetic.
Very few simulation models exist for teaching oculoplastics procedures. Cadaver-based models are advantageous because of their fidelity and realism, but they have
limited applications due to low availability and high cost
[5, 6]. A surgical skill board has been employed to teach
simple wound closure in a 1-day surgical course run by
Moorfields Eye Hospital [7]. Animal models, such as pig
eyelid [8] and split pig-head models [9], have been used
to teach eyelid laceration repair. However, there can be
inconsistency in the quality of the animal tissue and important anatomic differences when compared to the human eyelid.
The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a
cost-effective and reproducible surgical simulator to
teach margin-involving eyelid laceration repair. In
addition, we investigated the implementation of the
simulator within a wet lab training environment.
Methods
All study procedures were approved by the Institutional
Review Board of the Johns Hopkins University School of
Medicine and adhered to the requirements of the Health
Insurance Portability and Accountability Act.
Mannequin-based simulator
A mannequin-based training system called the Human
Eyelid Analog Device for Surgical Training and skills
Reinforcement in Trichiasis (HEAD START, Ho’s Art
LLC, Yadkinville, NC) was previously developed for
trachomatous trichiasis surgery training [10]. The mannequin head is made out of (...truncated)