The acetabular roof reinforcement plate for the treatment of displaced acetabular fractures in the elderly: results in 59 patients
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-03829-9
TRAUMA SURGERY
The acetabular roof reinforcement plate for the treatment of displaced
acetabular fractures in the elderly: results in 59 patients
Dietmar Krappinger1 · Herbert Resch2 · Richard A. Lindtner1 · Johannes Becker3 · Marian Mitterer2 ·
Thomas Freude2
Received: 9 November 2020 / Accepted: 8 February 2021
© The Author(s) 2021
Abstract
Introduction Open reduction and internal fixation is considered the gold standard of treatment for displaced acetabular
fractures in younger patients. For elderly patients with osteoporotic bone quality, however, primary total hip arthroplasty
(THA) with the advantage of immediate postoperative mobilization might be an option. The purpose of this study was to
evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of surgical treatment of displaced osteoporotic acetabular fractures using the
acetabular roof reinforcement plate (ARRP) combined with THA.
Materials and methods Between 2009 and 2019, 84 patients were operated using the ARRP combined with THA. Inclusion
criteria were displaced osteoporotic fractures of the acetabulum with or without previous hemi- or total hip arthroplasty, age
above 65 years, and pre-injury ability to walk at least with use of a walking frame. Of the 84 patients, 59 could be followed
up after 6 months clinically and radiographically. Forty-nine (83%) were primary fractures and 10 (17%) periprosthetic
acetabular fractures.
Results The mean age was 80.5 years (range 65–98 years). The average time from injury to surgery was 8.5 days (range
1–28). Mean time of surgery was 167 min (range 100–303 min). Immediate postoperative full weight bearing (FWB) was
allowed for 51 patients (86%). At the 6-month follow-up, all 59 patients except one showed bony healing and incorporation
of the ARRP. One case developed a non-union of the anterior column. No disruption, breakage or loosening of the ARRP
was seen. Additional CT scans performed in 18 patients confirmed bony healing. Twenty-six patients (44%) had regained
their pre-injury level of mobility. Complications requiring revision surgery occurred in 8 patients. Five of them were suffering from a prosthetic head dislocation, one from infection, one from hematoma and one from a heterotopic ossification.
Conclusions The ARRP has proven to provide sufficient primary stability to allow for immediate FWB in most cases and
represents a valuable option for the surgical management of displaced acetabular fractures in this challenging patient group.
Keywords Acetabular fracture · Osteoporosis · Elderly · Full weight bearing · Reinforcement ring · Antiprotrusion cage ·
Total hip arthroplasty
Introduction
* Thomas Freude
1
Department of Trauma Surgery, Medical University
of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
2
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Paracelsus
Medical University Salzburg, Muellner Hauptstrasse 48,
5020 Salzburg, Austria
3
Department of Trauma Surgery, BG Unfallklinik Murnau,
Murnau, Germany
Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is considered
the gold standard of treatment for displaced acetabular
fractures. The prerequisites for a favorable outcome after
ORIF, however, are anatomical reduction and maintenance
of reduction until healing. Over the last years the number of
patients with osteoporotic acetabular fractures has increased
with fractures commonly caused by low energy trauma from
a ground standing position [1, 2]. While the typical fracture pattern in younger patients involves the posterior column and posterior wall, the typical fracture pattern in older
patients involves the anterior column and the quadrilateral
13
Vol.:(0123456789)
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
plate (QLP) with concomitant medial dislocation of the femoral head [1, 3, 4]. Fractures in this age group are frequently
complex and comminuted with superomedial dome impaction and femoral head lesions [5, 6]. Whereas outcomes after
ORIF usually are satisfying in younger patients, outcomes
with ORIF alone have been mixed in elderly patients [7, 8].
Subcortical impaction makes anatomic reduction difficult to
achieve with the risk of postoperative arthritis and the necessity for secondary total hip arthroplasty (THA) [6, 9–13]. As
elderly patients often suffer from several comorbidities and
a limited physiological tolerance, a long surgical procedure
and a subsequent limited mobility due to restricted weight
bearing represent considerable health risks. Due to the special features of osteoporotic acetabular fractures, the desire
for primary implantation of a THA has increasingly arisen in
recent years [9, 11, 13–15]. The question of stable anchorage
of the implant in the fractured acetabulum was in the focus
of interest. Authors recommended a cabling reinforcement
technique [16], an antiprotrusion cage with additional plating [9, 11, 17, 18] or a two-incision approach technique [13].
The acetabular roof reinforcement plate (ARRP) presented in this study was designed with the intention to
achieve a stable fixation that allows full weight bearing
(FWB) immediately after surgery without any additional
fixation technique. The stability is achieved by an angular stable anchoring technique in the intact iliac bone. The
goal of this study is to present the clinical and radiological
results of a series of 59 patients with displaced osteoporotic
acetabular fractures who were treated with the ARRP and
hip arthroplasty.
Materials and methods
This retrospective study was approved by the local ethics
committee and no concerns were raised regarding the use
of the ARRP. From 2009 to 2019, eighty-four patients with
displaced fractures of the acetabulum were treated with the
ARRP as an antiprotrusion cage [19, 20]. Eighty-three were
acute fractures and one a non-union after open reduction
and internal fixation (ORIF). All 84 patients except 3 were
treated in two level-one trauma centers. Inclusion criteria
for the insertion of this implant were a displaced acetabular fracture with or without a previous hemi- or total hip
arthroplasty, age above 65 years, osteoporotic fracture as
identified by a low-energy trauma such as a ground-level
fall, significant marginal impaction and pre-injury ability to
walk at least with use of a walking frame.
Of the 84 patients, 11 had died due to cardiac failure
within the first 6 months after surgery. Another 13 patients
were seen only at the 3 months but not at the 6-month
follow-up visit and one patient was excluded due to failed
former osteosynthesis, leaving 59 patients for full clinical
13
and radiographical examination after 6 months (Table 1).
Thirty-four were males and 25 females. The mechanism of
injury included a simple ground level fall in 51, a level fall
(tractor, ladder) in 3, a ski accident in 3 and a bicycle accident in 2 patients.
The fractures were classified according to Letournel
and Judet [21]. Twenty-five were anterior column posterior hemitra (...truncated)