Repetitive Negative Thinking outperforms loneliness and lack of social connectedness as a predictor of prospective depressive symptoms in adolescents
Scandinavian Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology
Vol. 8:149-156 (2020) DOI 10.21307/sjcapp-2020-015
Research Article
Open Access
Repetitive Negative Thinking outperforms loneliness and lack of
social connectedness as a predictor of prospective depressive
symptoms in adolescents
Filip Raes¹, Margot Bastin²β, Tina Pede¹, Eline Belmans¹ Luc Goossens², Janne Vanhalst³
¹Research Unit Behaviour, Health and Psychopathology, KU Leuven, Belgium
²Research Unit School Psychology and Development in Context, KU Leuven, Belgium;
³Department of Developmental, Personality and Social Psychology, Ghent University, Belgium
*Corresponding author:
βjoint first author
Abstract
Background: Repetitive Negative Thinking (RNT) is a well-established predictor in adolescents of emotional problems, such
as depression. Surprisingly little research, however, has looked at the relative importance of RNT vs. more interpersonally
relevant variables in the context of depression, such as loneliness and lack of social connectedness.
Objective: The present study, therefore, set out to examine whether RNT is a significant predictor when taking into account
the contribution of loneliness and social connectedness.
Methods: A sample of 135 typically developing adolescents (N = 135; 79.3% girls; Mage = 17.5; range 16-21) completed
measures of depressive symptoms, RNT, loneliness and social connectedness at two time points with a 3-month interval.
Results: Results showed that above and beyond baseline depressive symptoms, RNT was the only other significant predictor
of prospective depressive symptoms.
Conclusions: According to these results, RNT seems a relatively more important factor to consider in the context of
adolescent depression than factors in the interpersonal or social context. Consequently, targeting RNT might be expected to
yield more significant gains in reducing or preventing depressive symptoms in adolescents compared to focusing on feelings
of loneliness or social connectedness – a hypothesis that remains to be tested.
Keywords: depression; Repetitive Negative Thinking; loneliness
Introduction
Knowledge about reliable risk factors for depression
is of critical importance, especially in adolescence,
given (a) the high prevalence of both clinical and
subsyndromal levels of depression in that period (1,
2) combined with (b) the well-documented
detrimental and far-reaching consequences of
adolescent depression later in life (3, 4) that even
exist for subclinical levels of depression (5). The
identification of risk factors, therefore, is crucial for
targeted prevention. An accumulating body of
research suggests that Repetitive Negative Thinking
(RNT) may be one such risk factor.
Repetitive Negative Thinking (RNT) refers to
excessive and repetitive thinking about current
concerns, problems, past experiences or worries
about the future (6, p. 192). Depressive rumination
and anxious worry are two prototypical examples of
RNT. A vast body of research has shown that RNT
is a reliable risk factor for a range of emotional
problems and disorders such as depression and
anxiety in both adults and adolescents (for reviews,
see: 6, 7, 8).
For example, in a longitudinal cohort study in 658
at-risk adolescents Wilkinson et al. (9) found that
RNT predicted both the onset of a depressive
episode and levels of depressive symptoms over a 12month interval, when controlled for baseline
symptomatology. Likewise, Bijttebier and colleagues
(10) showed that, again when controlled for baseline
symptom levels, RNT predicted prospective levels of
depressive symptoms at 3-month follow-up in 701
adolescents.
Given the above reviewed substantial evidence for
RNT as a risk factor for adolescent depression, RNT
has also become the focus of preventive
© 2020 Authors. This is an Open Access article licensed under the Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Repetitive Negative Thinking and loneliness
interventions in adolescence (e.g., 8, 11). However,
prevention programs targeting an individual or
intrapersonal risk factor such as RNT could be
criticized because they fail to take the interpersonal
or social context into account to a sufficient degree.
The same critique applies to research on RNT in
adolescent samples. Particularly in adolescence, when
forming and maintaining relationships with peers
becomes a central developmental task, peer
relationships and deficits thereof are known to affect
different aspects of psychological health, including
depressive symptoms (12). Both loneliness and lack
of connectedness could be indicators of such
problems in the relational realm. Loneliness refers to
the negative feelings that people experience when
they are dissatisfied with their social network (13).
Lack of connectedness, by contrast, refers to the
generalized and presumably deeper feeling that one
is a social outsider (14). Loneliness is known to
predict levels of and increases in symptoms of
depression in adolescents (e.g., 15). Higher scores on
measures of social connectedness, which typically
comprise both positively phrased items about
belongingness and negatively phrased items about
feeling an outsider (which are reverse coded), have
been found to be associated with lower scores for
depressive symptoms in this age group (e.g., 16).
Although loneliness and the experience of failed
belongingness, such as lack of social connectedness,
clearly are related constructs, it has been suggested
that they represent distinct psychological experiences
(17). As a result, they may differently predict
depressive symptoms. Together, it may very well be
that once these social determinants of depression are
taken into account, the role of RNT as an individual
risk factor for depression would be considerably
reduced. Or, vice versa, it may be the case that the
role of loneliness and lack of social connectedness in
the prospective prediction of depressive symptoms
diminishes once RNT is brought into the picture.
Surprisingly little research, however, has looked at
the relative importance of RNT vs. loneliness or
social connectedness in predicting depressive
symptoms in adolescents.
The present study had three main objectives. First,
we set out to replicate whether RNT is a predictor of
prospective depressive symptomatology in a group
of adolescents. Second, we checked to what extent
RNT would remain a significant predictor when
taking into account the role of loneliness and social
connectedness, given the salience of social
relationships in this developmental phase. Third, and
finally, we examined potential moderating effects
between RNT and both loneliness and
connectedness. It could be, for example, that RNT
interacts with such social factors in predicting
depressive symptoms, such that loneliness and/or
lack of connectedness would be especially
detrimental in the context of depression for
adolescents who are characterized by high levels of
RNT (cf. 18).
Method
(...truncated)