Promoting and Containing New Womanhood in the Pages of Photoplay: The Case Of “Little Mary” Pickford and Her Mediated Alter Egos on the Cusp of the Roaring Twenties
Promoting and Containing New Womanhood
in the Pages of Photoplay:
The Case Of “Little Mary” Pickford and Her Mediated
Alter Egos on the Cusp of the Roaring Twenties
Kylo-Patrick R. HART
Abstract
Actress Mary Pickford is perhaps best remembered for her silent-screen persona “Little
Mary.” But there was another important aspect to her Hollywood career that is frequently
overlooked today: Pickford’s rise to power and fame corresponded with the era of the “New
Woman” in U.S. society. This article explores the mediated construction of new
womanhood as communicated through the coverage of Pickford’s career between 1918 and
1921 in the pages of the fan magazine Photoplay. It demonstrates how Photoplay used
coverage of Pickford to promote the ideal of new womanhood until 1919, when she became
the most powerful woman in American moviemaking by co-founding United Artists with
three men. After that, at the start of the Roaring Twenties, the magazine sought to contain
new womanhood by presenting Pickford almost exclusively as a child, without continuing
to acknowledge her abilities as a savvy movie mogul and grown woman as it had regularly
done in the past—until significant changes in her personal life required another noteworthy
shift in the magazine’s coverage patterns of this star.
Keywords: fan magazine, feminism, new womanhood, Roaring Twenties, stardom
Actress Mary Pickford (1892–1979) is perhaps best remembered for her
silent-screen persona “Little Mary,” the charming, childlike, demure,
mischievous, spunky character type she played in so many of the more
than 200 movies she appeared in over the course of her career (Felder 1996:
334; Windeler 1973: 7). With her barely five-foot frame, expressive features,
and trademark curls, Pickford became widely regarded as America’s
Sweetheart after she gave up a decade-long career on the stage in 1909 and
made her transition into movies. In an era that prided itself on innocence,
Pickford emerged as the cinematic feminine ideal, the girl every young
man wanted to have—as his sister (Felder 1996: 334). She played a 12-yearProfessor and Chair Department of Film, Television and Digital Media, Texas
Christian University, USA.
31
Cultural Intertexts
Year VII Volume 10 (2020)
The Roaring (20)20s
old when she was 24 (in 1917’s The Little Princess) (Corliss 1998: 53); she was
equally convincing playing the long-suffering, poor little girl (e.g., in 1919’s
Daddy Long Legs) as the poor little rich girl (e.g., in 1917’s Rebecca of
Sunnybrook Farm). As entertainment writer Richard Corliss sums up
Pickford’s appeal to fans:
Pickford was a household goddess of the silent screen. […] She didn’t ooze
sex appeal, even of the Lolita type; in her film roles she was closer to
daughter than to sweetheart. […] Little Mary struck so deep a chord in the
new mass of moviegoers because she reflected the dreams of the
immigrant and the pain of those she called “the Great Unloved.” [...] Like
Steven Spielberg, Pickford made an art and millions from the acute
remembrance and reconfiguration of childhood. (1998: 54)
But there was another important side to Mary Pickford that is frequently
overlooked by many of her remaining fans today. While on screen Pickford
retained an innocent, childlike appeal, off screen she was regarded as a
powerful businesswoman in her own right, one who achieved complete
control over her own career— “including the contractual right of final cut
of her films, by the time she was 25 years old” (Eyman 1990: 2). “It took
longer to make one of Mary’s contracts than it did to make one of her
pictures,” producer Sam Goldwyn once remarked, attesting to the star’s
keen ability to negotiate the most favorable terms for herself in exchange
for her much-in-demand performances (Felder 1996: 334). Pickford earned
$5 a day when she started working in movies in 1909; by 1916, as a result of
her business acumen, she was earning an unprecedented $10,000 a week
(Windeler 1973: 6; Felder 1996: 334). She was a pioneer in product
endorsement with offerings ranging from Mary Pickford massage cream to
the Little Mary radiator cap (Corliss 1998: 53), as well as the first female
movie star to helm her own independent production company, Mary
Pickford Film Corporation, upon launching it with her mother in 1918
(Felder 1996: 335). The following year, when she founded United Artists
along with fellow actors Douglas Fairbanks and Charles Chaplin and
director D. W. Griffith at the age of 26, Pickford ranked among the most
powerful players Hollywood has ever encountered.
Pickford’s rise to power, fortune, and fame corresponded with the
era of the “New Woman” (Singer 1996: 177) in U.S. society, which came
into being in the years between 1880 and 1920, and it reached new heights
at the start of the Roaring Twenties, a decade filled with significant social,
cultural, and lifestyle changes for American women and others (Hourly
32
Cultural Intertexts
Year VII Volume 10 (2020)
The Roaring (20)20s
2017). During this period, new conceptions of a woman’s legitimate domain
emerged that deviated from the stringent expectations of women during
the Victorian era. As film studies scholar Ben Singer (1996: 177) has noted,
substantially reduced fertility rates and the growing range of widely
available, labor-saving products and machines provided lower-, middle-,
and upper-class women alike greater freedom to pursue activities outside
of the home. “Whereas only about 10 percent of women worked in paid
labor in 1880,” he writes, “this figure had almost doubled by 1910, or
tripled if one looks only at the urban population. By 1910, over 40 percent
of young, single women worked for several years before marriage, and the
figure was probably over 60 percent in urban areas” (Singer 1996: 177). In
addition to the workplace, Singer explains that the ongoing development of
amusement parks, department stores, movie theaters, and music halls
encouraged the increasing presence of women in the public sphere during
this period, as did enhancements in mobility enabled by electric trolleys
and the heightened popularity of bicycles as symbols of female
emancipation.
As the United States moved into modernity at the turn of the
century and beyond, the increasingly pervasive cultural image of women
as able to stand on their own began to displace outdated notions of female
dependence on men (Singer 1996: 178). The trademarks of the New Woman
included energy, independence, initiative, self-reliance, and direct
interaction in the extradomestic world; print media became preoccupied
with these attributes and their corresponding cultural construct of modern
womanhood as they continuously endeavored to articulate, caricature,
critique, define, detail, and mythologize its various dimensions (Singer
1996: 177-178). These were not always easy tasks, however. Ultimately,
popular magazines and other publications in this period ended up seeking
to contain the New Woman almost as frequently as they sought to l (...truncated)