Correction to: The Opacity of Law: On the Hidden Impact of Experts’ Opinion on Legal Decision-Making
Ó Springer Nature B.V. 2021
Law and Philosophy
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10982-021-09426-6
Correction
DAMIANO CANALE
CORRECTION TO: THE OPACITY OF LAW: ON THE HIDDEN
IMPACT OF EXPERTS’ OPINION ON LEGAL DECISION-MAKING
CORRECTION TO: LAW AND PHILOSOPHY
HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1007/S10982-021-09408-8
In the original version of the article, the example given under the
heading ‘‘IV. INFERENTIAL COMPETENCE AND REFERENTIAL
COMPETENCE’’ was published incorrectly. The corrected example
is given below:
(1) ‘Cicero’ contains six letters
(2) ‘Cicero’ and ‘Tully’ refer to the same person
Although (1) and (2) are true, the sentence
(3) ‘Tully’ contains six letters
The original article has been corrected.
Department of Legal Studies
Bocconi University, via Röntgen 1, 20136, Milan, Italy
E-mail:
Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional
claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The original article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1007/s10982-021-09408-8.
(...truncated)
