Quantifying the prevalence of (non)-response to fertilizers in sub-Saharan Africa using on-farm trial data
Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-021-10174-1
(0123456789().,-volV)
( 01234567
89().,-volV)
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Quantifying the prevalence of (non)-response to fertilizers
in sub-Saharan Africa using on-farm trial data
Generose Nziguheba
. Joost van Heerwaarden . Bernard Vanlauwe
Received: 5 March 2021 / Accepted: 20 September 2021
Ó The Author(s) 2021
Abstract Poor and variable crop responses to fertilizer applications constitute a production risk and may
pose a barrier to fertilizer adoption in sub-Saharan
Africa (SSA). Attempts to measure response variability and quantify the prevalence of non-response
empirically are complicated by the fact that data from
on-farm fertilizer trials generally include diverse
nutrients and do not include on-site replications. The
first aspect limits the extent to which different studies
can be combined and compared, while the second does
not allow to distinguish actual field-level response
variability from experimental error and other residual
variations. In this study, we assembled datasets from
41 on-farm fertilizer response trials on cereals and
legumes across 11 countries, representing different
nutrient applications, to assess response variability
and quantify the frequency of occurrence of non-
response to fertilizers. Using two approaches to
account for residual variation, we estimated nonresponse, defined here as a zero agronomic response to
fertilizer in a given year, to be relatively rare, affecting
0–1 and 7–16% of fields on average for cereals and
legumes respectively. The magnitude of response
could not be explained by climatic and selected topsoil
variables, suggesting that much of the observed
variation may relate to unpredictable seasonal and/or
local conditions. This implies that, despite demonstrable spatial bias in our sample of trials, the
estimated proportion of non-response may be representative for other agro-ecologies across SSA. Under
the latter assumption, we estimated that roughly
260,000 ha of cereals and 3,240,000 ha of legumes
could be expected to be non-responsive in any
particular year.
Supplementary Information The online version contains
supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/
s10705-021-10174-1.
Keywords Absolute response Cereals Fertilizer
intensity based-response Legumes
Representativeness
G. Nziguheba (&) B. Vanlauwe
Central Africa hub coordination office, International
Institute of Tropical Agriculture,
P O Box 30772-00100, Nairobi, Kenya
e-mail:
J. van Heerwaarden (&)
Plant Production Systems, Mathematical and Statistical
Methods, Wageningen University, P.O .Box 430,
6700. AK Wageningen, The Netherlands
e-mail:
Introduction
Low agricultural productivity, recurrent food shortages and high prevalence of food insecurity in subSaharan Africa (SSA) have led to repeated calls to
intensify agriculture, with a particular focus on
123
Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst
addressing the widespread soil fertility depletion in
agricultural lands (UN Millennium project 2005;
Sanchez 2010; Shapouri et al. 2010; Andriesse and
Giller 2015; Binswanger-Mkhize and Savastano
2017). Sustainable agricultural intensification is
viewed as a prerequisite for combatting food insecurity and reversing the trend of natural resource
degradation (Tittonell and Giller 2013; Vanlauwe
et al. 2014; Zurek et al. 2015), and an increased use of
mineral fertilizers is considered to be an essential part
of the solution (IFDC 2006; Sanchez 2010; Holden
2018). Despite efforts to enhance the use of fertilizers
in the region (Druilhe and Barreiro-Hurle 2012; Jayne
et al. 2018), average application rates remain very low,
with recent studies reporting an average fertilizer use
around 14 kg ha-1 (Bonilla Cedrez et al. 2020),
though there is a wide variability between countries,
with averages of some countries surpassing
50 kg ha-1 (Liverpool-Tasie et al. 2017; Sheahan
and Barret 2017). While the accessibility to fertilizers
remains a main constraint to the widespread use of
fertilizers by smallholder farmers, the production risk
associated with poor crop responses caused by variable weather conditions (Mafongoya et al 2007) and/
or by local edaphic constraints (e.g. limited soil
rootable zone or water holding capacity and soil
organic matter) i.e. the so-called non-responsive soils
(Vanlauwe et al. 2010), could discourage farmers to
invest in fertilizers (Holden 2018; Schut and Giller
2020). A lack of crop response to the application of
fertilizers represents an obvious economic loss to
farmers and, if enduring, may make fertilizer application unattractive to farmers and potentially harmful to
the environment. Determining the rate of incidence of
non-response to fertilizer is needed to understand the
magnitude of the problem, and this requires on-farm
observations on the variability in yield responses.
While there is a diverse literature reporting on
response variability observed in on-farm trials performed at different spatial scales across SSA (Tittonel
et al. 2007; Kihara et al. 2016; Zingore et al. 2007;
Ronner et al. 2016; Njoroge et al. 2017; Ichami et al.
2019; Roobroeck et al. 2021; Garba et al. 2018;
Wortmann et al. 2017), few quantify the proportion of
fields that fail to show an appreciable response in a
given year. Two methodological issues make the
quantification of non-response in on-farm data more
challenging than it may seem. First, quantifying
inadequate yield response in a dataset on fertilizer
123
responses requires a measure against which observations can be compared. For single nutrient fertilizers,
the agronomic efficiency (AE), the amount of extra
produce per quantity of nutrient applied, which is
commonly reported while assessing response to inputs
(Olk et al. 1999; Ngome et al. 2013; Kaizzi et al. 2012;
Vanlauwe et al. 2016; Kamanga et al. 2014; Xu et al.
2014; Adiele et al. 2020) provides such a measure.
However, an equivalent metric does not exist for
multi-nutrient fertilizers which are typically used in
on-farm trials and by farmers in SSA, often with
varying rates for the different nutrients, and which are
expected to illicit different yield responses to the same
total amount of fertilizer. One solution is to restrict
comparisons to cases where the same fertilizer is
applied, but this obviously limits the scope and
applicability of such analyses, given that various
types of fertilizers are used in SSA. Another option is
to look at economic efficiencies only, since these can
be calculated on any type of fertilizer (Jayne and
Rashid 2013), but the variation in response is then
determined to a large extent by differences in input
prices (Bonilla Cedrez et al. 2020), which can vary
over space and time, therefore requiring additional
estimates of agronomic response for proper interpretation and translation to current conditions.
The second issue relates to the lack of on-site
replication that tends to characterize on-farm trials
(Bielders and Gérard 2015; Njoroge e (...truncated)