Bankruptcy & Bailouts, Subsidies & Stimulus: The Government Toolset for Responding to Market Distress
University of Chicago Legal Forum
Volume 2021
Article 17
2021
Bankruptcy & Bailouts, Subsidies & Stimulus: The Government
Toolset for Responding to Market Distress
Anthony Casey
University of Chicago
Follow this and additional works at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf
Part of the Law Commons
Recommended Citation
Casey, Anthony (2021) "Bankruptcy & Bailouts, Subsidies & Stimulus: The Government Toolset for
Responding to Market Distress," University of Chicago Legal Forum: Vol. 2021 , Article 17.
Available at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol2021/iss1/17
This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in
University of Chicago Legal Forum by an authorized editor of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please
contact .
Bankruptcy & Bailouts, Subsidies & Stimulus:
The Government Toolset for Responding to
Market Distress
Anthony J. Casey†
In the spring of 2020, as the COVID-19 pandemic shut down economies around the world, pressure arose for governments to respond to
the growing threat of pandemic-related market distress.1 In addition to
responding to the direct public health emergency, governments were
expected to stabilize markets—both financial and economic—and provide relief to those harmed by the pandemic’s market effects.
In the United States,2 the initial proposals for government action
varied in nature and focus. Some proposals targeted the financial system,3 while some targeted small businesses4 and individuals.5 Others
†
Donald M. Ephraim Professor of Law and Economics; Faculty Director of The Center on
Law and Finance. I thank Madeline Prebil and Leonor Suarez for excellent research assistance.
The Richard Weil Faculty Research Fund and the Paul H. Leffman Fund provided generous support.
1
I use the term “market distress” as a general term that includes both economic and financial
distress. The distinction between financial and economic distress, and its importance, is discussed
throughout this article.
2
I focus on the United States. While the analysis applies more generally, the specifics with
regard to institutions, existing laws, proposals, and government actions differ across jurisdictions.
3
See, e.g., Kevin P. Gallagher et al., Safety First: Expanding the Global Financial Safety Net
in
Response
to
COVID-19,
12
GLOBAL
POL’Y
140
(2021),
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1758-5899.12871 [https://perma.cc/AA33-M9FG].
4
See, e.g., Shaun Shuxun Wang, Government Support for SMEs in Response to COVID-19:
Theoretical Model Using Wang Transform (Swiss Fin. Inst. Res. Paper Series, Working Paper No.
20-59,
2020),
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3608646
[https://perma.cc/K3AS-6YHC]; Hal Scott, The Fed Needs to Move Faster, WALL ST. J. (Apr. 10,
2020),
https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-fed-needs-to-move-faster-11586557721
[https://perma.cc/ASH9-VCQZ].
5
See, e.g., Phil Lord, Incentivising Employment During the COVID-19 Pandemic, 8 THEORY
&
PRAC.
LEGIS.
355
(2020),
https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2020.1792635
[https://perma.cc/UU9J-XZDW]; Peter Conti-Brown & David Skeel, Bankruptcy and the Discount
Window (Nov. 15, 2020) (preliminary draft).
63
64
THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LEGAL FORUM
[2021
were intended to bail out large businesses6 and specific industries.7 Still
other proposals took a more institutional focus.8 In the context of bankruptcy law, many imagined building up the bankruptcy system as a primary bulwark against a seemingly imminent wave of economic and financial distress.9
With the exception of measures related to financial markets, the
actual responses formed a chaotic mix of disconnected half measures
that neither stabilized the economy nor provided meaningful relief to
those most affected.10 While that failure may be attributed in part to
general government dysfunction and legislative gridlock, a large part of
the problem arises from the lack of a clearly identified purpose and
framework to guide government responses.
To prepare for the next crisis, we must use this failure to better
understand the toolset available to governments dealing with economic
and financial threats. The main lessons to take away are that the choice
of tools deployed by governments to alleviate a crisis should depend on
the nature of the specific problem at hand and that scattershot approaches are unlikely to work.
6
See, e.g., Ken Judd & Karl Schmedders, Why the U.S. Government Needs a New Corporate
Bailout Structure—One That Doesn’t Rely on Loans, FORTUNE (Apr. 16, 2020), https://fortune.com
/2020/04/16/coronavirus-economic-impact-government-bailout-business-loans-preferred-stock/
[https://perma.cc/45FP-PGEY].
7
See, e.g., Megersa Abate et al., Government Support to Airlines in the Aftermath of the
COVID-19 Pandemic, 89 J. AIR TRANSPORT MGMT. 101931 (2020), https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969699720305147 [https://perma.cc/2EC9-UB5W] (endorsing government support for the airlines industry); see also Fabian Stephany et al., The Corisk-Index: A
Data-Mining Approach to Identify Industry-Specific Risk Assessments Related to COVID-19 in
Real-Time (Working Paper No. 2003.12432v3, 2020), https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2003.12432.html [https://perma.cc/NY5S-V9VB] (creating an online index to identify industries most in need of government support due to economic shocks from COVID-19).
8
See, e.g., Philip Rocco et al., Stuck In Neutral? Federalism, Policy Instruments, And CounterCyclical Responses to COVID-19 in the United States, 39 POL’Y & SOC’Y 458 (2020),
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14494035.2020.1783793
[https://perma.cc/6JT84PWU]; Stuti Khemani, An Opportunity to Build Legitimacy and Trust in Public Institutions in
the Time of COVID-19 (World Bank: Rsch & Pol’y, Brief No. 148256, 2020), https://ssrn.com/abstract=3602352 [https://perma.cc/DJL9-Z6FQ].
9
See, e.g., Benjamin Iverson et al., Estimating the Need for Additional Bankruptcy Judges in
Light of the COVID-19 Pandemic, 11 HARV. BUS. L. REV. ONLINE (2020), https://www.hblr.org/wpcontent/uploads/sites/18/2021/01/HBLR-Estimating-the-Need-for-Additional-Bankruptcy-JudgesProof_2.pdf [https://perma.cc/9T2J-PFUQ]; see also Robin Greenwood et al., Sizing up Corporate
Restructuring in the COVID Crisis (Nat’l Bureau of Econ. Rsch., Working Paper No. 28104, 2020),
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3731274 [https://perma.cc/TAQ7-C62G]; Edward Morrison & Andrea C.
Saavedra, Bankruptcy’s Role in the COVID-19 Crisis (Colum. L. & Econ., Working Paper No. 624,
2020), https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3567127
[https://perma.cc/JRE4KEHR].
10
I focus on the events and actions taken in 2020 at the beginning of the pandemic. The narrative of these events will necessarily become incomplete as the pandemic continues and further
government measures are adopted. For example, in 2021, the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021
provided an additional $1.9 trillion in stimulus an (...truncated)