Predictors of Nodal Metastasis in Cutaneous Head and Neck Cancers
Current Oncology Reports
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-022-01249-5
HEAD AND NECK CANCERS (EY HANNA, SECTION EDITOR)
Predictors of Nodal Metastasis in Cutaneous Head and Neck Cancers
Albert Y. Han1,2,3 · Maie A. St. John1,2,3
Accepted: 15 May 2021
© The Author(s) 2022
Abstract
Purpose of Review The complex and varied drainage patterns in the head and neck present a challenge in the regional control
of cutaneous neoplasms. Lymph node involvement significantly diminishes survival, often warranting more aggressive treatment. Here, we review the risk factors associated with lymphatic metastasis, in the context of the evolving role of sentinel
lymph node biopsy.
Recent Findings In cutaneous head and neck melanomas, tumor thickness, age, size, mitosis, ulceration, and specific histology have been associated with lymph node metastasis (LNM). In head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas,
tumor thickness, size, perineural invasion, and immunosuppression are all risk factors for nodal metastasis. The risk factors
for lymph node involvement in Merkel cell carcinoma are not yet fully defined, but emerging evidence indicates that tumor
thickness and size may be associated with regional metastasis.
Summary The specific factors that predict a greater risk of LNM for cutaneous head and neck cancers generally include
depth of invasion, tumor size, mitotic rate, ulceration, immunosuppression, and other histopathological factors.
Keywords Cutaneous cancer · Squamous cell carcinoma · Melanoma · Regional metastasis · Parotid metastasis
Introduction
Cutaneous neoplasms are clinically categorized into melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancers. Non-melanoma
skin cancers include cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma
(cSCC), basal cell carcinoma (BCC), Merkel cell carcinoma
(MCC), and other less common tumors including sarcomas
and adnexal tumors. BCC typically undergoes localized
slow growth and rarely metastasizes, but cSCC, melanoma,
and other malignancies often spread to regional and distant
sites, which can significantly impact the clinical course of
the disease and patient outcomes. The exact incidence of
This article is part of the Topical collection on Head and Neck
Cancers.
* Maie A. St. John
1
Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University
of California Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA, USA
2
UCLA Head and Neck Cancer Program, UCLA Medical
Center, 10833 Le Conte Ave, 62‑132 CHS, Los Angeles,
CA 90095, USA
3
Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, UCLA Medical
Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
cSCC is unknown as cSCCs are often excluded in national
tumor registries. However, a recent estimate indicated a
global prevalence of 3.1 million cases of malignant melanoma and 2.2 million cases of cSCC in 2015 [1]. Despite
the relatively small surface area of the head and neck region,
approximately 60-70% of cSCCs [2] and 20% of cutaneous
melanomas [3] arise in the head and neck.
Cutaneous cancers of the head and neck often spread via
the lymphatic system toward the neck, frequently involving the intraparotid lymph nodes depending on the location of the primary tumor. The drainage pattern in the head
and neck assumes a general division between the anterior
and posterior skin zones with a proposed watershed zone in
between (Fig. 1) [4]. The posterior head and neck regions
drain to the occipital, postauricular, cervical level V, and
supraclavicular fossa. In contrast, the anterior head and neck
regions drain to the anterior cervical chains, as well as the
parotid and preauricular nodes [5]. Approximately 20–40%
of head and neck neoplasms spread to lymph nodes outside
of clinically predicted levels [6, 7]. When using a sentinel
lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in the head and neck or trunk
regions, preoperative lymphoscintigraphy or SPECT/CT is
recommended to guide the location of interval (in-transit)
nodes that might harbor disease [8]. Although not yet the
13
Vol.:(0123456789)
Current Oncology Reports
indicators, along with recurrence number and grade, that
accurately identified patients with cSCC of the ear who
might benefit from neck dissection.
Tumor Size
Fig. 1 Predicted pattern of metastasis of head and neck cutaneous
melanoma proposed by O’Brien et al. The orange area represents
the “watershed area” from which unpredictable drainage can occur (
Adapted from O’Brien et al. American Journal of Surgery) [4]
standard of care, the literature supports the use of SPECT/
CT as it has been found to increase the SLN yield, resulting
in a greater ability to detect metastatic involvement [9].
Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma
of the Head and Neck
The prognosis for patients with cSCC of the head and neck
(cSCCHN) is excellent when diagnosed early. However, a
subset of these patients develops lymph node metastasis
(LNM) and ultimately experiences poorer outcomes. LNM
develops in 5% of patients after resection of the primary
lesion [10]. If found at presentation or after treatment, LNM
is associated with a higher 5-year mortality [11]. Involvement of the lymph nodes also increases the likelihood of
recurrence to approximately 51% and decreases the 3-year
disease-specific survival to 52%, even with adjuvant treatment [12]. Therefore, understanding the risk factors for
metastasis in cSCCHN is critical for early identification
of patients who need more aggressive, often multimodal,
management.
Depth of Invasion
Tumor depth of invasion (DOI) has been consistently
reported as a risk factor for metastasis whether measured
in Breslow thickness or histological depth [13]. The relative risk is higher for patients with tumors with a DOI cutoff of > 2 mm [14]. In one recent study, no metastasis was
observed for superficial lesions with DOIs of less than
2 mm [10]. Tumor invasion beyond subcutaneous fat was
associated with nodal metastasis (subhazard ratio 7.2) [15].
In a prediction model proposed by Wermker et al. [16],
tumor depth and invasion of cartilage were two of the four
13
A tumor size greater than 20 mm was associated with disease progression, including regional metastasis [13]. For
the current eighth edition staging system developed by the
American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC), the primary
tumor staging is determined by the dimensions of the tumor:
T1 (2 cm or less in diameter) and T2 (greater than 2 cm but
less than or equal to 4 cm). Tumor size is often associated
with LNMs and worse survival with discrete cutoffs (e.g.
greater than 20 mm in the greatest dimension) or as a continuous variable [17, 18, 19, 20]. Tumor size was also an
independent predictor of nodal metastasis (> 20 mm) with
a HR of 2.22 [10]. In a large study of 6,000 patients in New
Zealand, tumor size as a continuous was a prognosticator
of LNM with HR 1.41 (p < 0.0001) [21]. Alternative measurements of the tumor size, such as tumor volume greater
than 2,500 mm, were significantly associated with LNMs
as well [22].
Subsite
Certain sites of the head and neck appear to be associated
more with LNMs. During development, t (...truncated)