Structure-Activity Relationships of Styrylquinoline and Styrylquinoxaline Derivatives as α-Synuclein Imaging Probes.
pubs.acs.org/acsmedchemlett
Letter
Structure−Activity Relationships of Styrylquinoline and
Styrylquinoxaline Derivatives as α‑Synuclein Imaging Probes
Kohei Nakagawa, Hiroyuki Watanabe,* Sho Kaide, and Masahiro Ono*
Cite This: ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2022, 13, 1598−1605
ACCESS
Metrics & More
Read Online
Article Recommendations
sı Supporting Information
*
ABSTRACT: Synucleinopathies are characterized by the deposition of α-synuclein
(α-syn) aggregates before the onset of clinical symptoms. Therefore, in vivo imaging of
α-syn may contribute to early diagnosis of these diseases and has attracted much
attention in recent years. However, no clinically useful probes have been reported. In
the present study, 16 quinoline/quinoxaline derivatives with different styryl and
fluorine groups were evaluated in order to develop α-syn imaging probes. Among
them, SQ3, which is a quinoline analogue with a p-(dimethylamino)styryl group and
fluoroethoxy group at the 2- and 7- positions of the skeleton, displayed moderate
selectivity for α-syn aggregates over β-amyloid (Aβ) aggregates (Ki = 230 nM), while
maintaining high binding affinity for α-syn aggregates (Ki = 39.3 nM). In a
biodistribution study, [18F]SQ3 exhibited high uptake (2.08% ID/g at 2 min after
intravenous injection) into a normal mouse brain. Taken together, we demonstrate
that [18F]SQ3 has basic properties as a lead compound for the development of a useful
α-syn imaging probe.
KEYWORDS: α-Synuclein, PET probe, Styrylquinoline, Styrylquinoxaline
I
permeability. The second problem is selectivity for α-syn
aggregates over β-amyloid (Aβ) aggregates. It is well-known
that α-syn aggregates are colocalized with Aβ�which is a
major biomarker of Alzheimer’s disease (AD)�aggregates in
some synucleinopathy patients’ brains.6 Since both proteins
form aggregates with β-sheet structures, most of the probes
with high affinity for α-syn aggregates also exhibit high affinity
for Aβ aggregates. In addition, the concentration of α-syn
aggregates is much lower than that of Aβ aggregates in the
brain.7 Taken together, α-syn imaging probes must show
selectivity for α-syn aggregates versus Aβ aggregates. Therefore, it is necessary to identify a compound showing three
properties: high binding affinity for α-syn aggregates, high
brain uptake, and selective binding for α-syn aggregates.
Various kinds of quinoline and quinoxaline analogues were
reported as amyloid imaging probes.8−13 Some reports
suggested that binding affinities for Aβ aggregates change,
depending on the position of the substitution group on the
quinoxaline scaffold.11,13 Furthermore, there was a report that
the quinoline scaffold with a styryl moiety at the 2-position
displayed a high binding affinity for α-syn aggregates ([18F]14:
n recent years, with the advent of an aging society, the
increase in the number of patients suffering from synucleinopathies, including Parkinson’s disease, dementia with Lewy
bodies, and multiple-system atrophy, has been a concern.
However, even the method of definite diagnosis has not been
established, let alone radical treatment. Abnormal depositions
of Lewy bodies, Lewy neurites, and glial cytoplasmic inclusions
are observed in the brains of patients suffering from these
diseases before the onset of clinical symptoms.1 α-Synuclein
(α-syn) aggregates are major constituents of these hallmarks
and have been gathering attention as biomarkers of synucleinopathies. However, the association between the progress of
synucleinopathies and amount of α-syn aggregates in the brain
is unclear. Therefore, in vivo imaging of α-syn is considered to
contribute to early diagnosis and elucidation of the pathophysiology of synucleinopathies.
Among several imaging methods, positron emission
tomography (PET) and single-photon emission computed
tomography (SPECT) are excellent tools for non-invasive and
quantitative imaging of biomolecules with high sensitivity.
Based on this, several kinds of nuclear medicine imaging
probes targeting α-syn aggregates have been reported over the
past few years.2−5 However, the detection of α-syn aggregates
in vivo remains elusive. There are two major problems
regarding the in vivo imaging of α-syn aggregates. The first
problem is low brain permeability. Many α-syn imaging probes
with high binding affinity for α-syn aggregates generally have a
large molecular size (molecular weight (MW) > 430) and high
lipophilicity (CLogP > 4.0), markedly decreasing brain
© 2022 American Chemical Society
Received: June 15, 2022
Accepted: September 21, 2022
Published: September 26, 2022
1598
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmedchemlett.2c00279
ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2022, 13, 1598−1605
ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters
pubs.acs.org/acsmedchemlett
Letter
Scheme 1. Synthesis Route of Quinoxaline Derivativesa
a
Reagents and conditions: (a) pyruvic aldehyde, EtOH, 25 °C; (b) p-dimethylaminobenzaldehyde, piperidine, AcOH, toluene, reflux; (c) Bu4Sn,
Pd(Ph3)4, toluene, reflux; (d) I2, CHCl3, 25 °C; (e) (1) Cu(acac)2, LiOH·H2O, N1,N2-bis(4-hydroxy-2,6-dimethylphenyl)oxalamide, dimethyl
sulfoxide (DMSO)/H2O, 80 °C, (2) 2-fluoroethyl p-toluenesulfonate, Cs2CO3, DMF, 95 °C.
Scheme 2-1. Synthesis Routes of Quinoline, Aldehyde, and Fluorine Scaffoldsa
a
Reagents and conditions: (a) ethyl vinyl ether, AcOH, 25 °C → 100 °C; (b) N-bromosuccinimide (NBS), conc. H2SO4, 25 °C; (c) NHMe2, H2O,
80 °C; (d) 1,2,3-triazole, K2CO3, DMF, 100 °C; (e) tetrabutylammonium fluoride (TBAF), tetrahydrofuran (THF), 70 °C; (f) TREAT HF, 130
°C.
inhibition constant Ki = 18 nM, dissociation constant Kd = 79
nM) in vitro.14 This report also suggested that the double bond
between quinoline and the aromatic ring may be important to
enhance the affinity for α-syn aggregates. This study was
focused on the styrylquinoline/quinoxaline backbone, and
structure−activity relationship studies were performed on 16
derivatives for the development of α-syn imaging probes.
Quinoxaline derivatives were synthesized according to
Scheme 1. After a mixture of 1 and 1′ was synthesized
according to a method reported previously,15 styrylquinoxaline
scaffolds were obtained by a condensation reaction. In the case
of 3 (ISQ), the 7-tributyltin quinoxaline scaffold was prepared
from a mixture of bromo compounds using a bromo-totributyltin exchange reaction catalyzed by Pd(0) and isolated.
Thereafter, the 7-tributyltin scaffold was reacted with I2 in
chloroform at 25 °C to give 3. In the case of 4 (SQ1) and 5
(SQ2), crude phenol scaffolds were reacted with 2-fluoroethyl
p-toluenesulfonate in N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) to give
4 and 5 after preparing the crude phenol scaffolds from a
mixture of bromo compounds using a method reported
previously.16 Compounds 4 (SQ1) and 5 (SQ2) could be
separated by column chromatography. Finally, the structures of
quinoxaline derivatives were determined by X-ray crystallography. The total yields from the materials were 6−16%.
Next, quinoline derivatives were synthesized acc (...truncated)