Modelling bodyweight to avoid anthelmintic underdosing of goats in resources-limited settings
Tropical Animal Health and Production
(2023) 55:72
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-023-03479-6
REGULAR ARTICLES
Modelling bodyweight to avoid anthelmintic underdosing of goats
in resources‑limited settings
M. J. Evans1 · C. L. Kaona2,3 · A. K. Barros4 · J. L. Burdon Bailey3 · P. Chikungwa5 · L. M. Costa‑Junior4 · L. Gamble3 ·
A. M. Hopker1 · R. F. Kelly1 · F. Lohr3 · R. Silva4 · N. D. Sargison1
Received: 1 August 2022 / Accepted: 23 January 2023
© The Author(s) 2023
Abstract
Improved management of livestock in resource-limited settings can provide a means towards improved human nutrition and
livelihoods. However, gastrointestinal nematodes (GIN) are a significant production-limiting factor. Anthelmintics play a
role in GIN management; however, few anthelmintic classes are available in many low-middle-income countries. Utilising
a limited range of classes may increase selection for anthelmintic resistance; therefore, strategies to reduce other selective
pressures are of heightened importance. Avoiding anthelmintic underdosing is one such strategy, but it can be challenging
without access to accurate bodyweight measurement. Many previous studies have used thoracic girth as a practical proxy
for bodyweight in goats; however, they have rarely considered the potential impact of natural variation on therapeutic doses.
Here, the relationship between bodyweight and thoracic girth was modelled using data from 820 goats from three Malawian
biomes in two seasons, with the specific aim of avoiding underestimation of bodyweight. The internally cross-validated linear
regression (∛Weight ~ 0.053 + 0.040*Girth, R2 = 0.92, rounded up to the nearest 5 kg) was validated against data from an
additional 352 Malawian goats (1.4% of goats allocated an underdose and 10.2% allocated a dose > 200% of bodyweight).
The equation was further externally validated using an historical dataset of 150 goats from Assam, India (2.7% of goats
were allocated to an underdose and 24.8% allocated to a > 200% of bodyweight). These results suggest that a more globally
generalisable approach may be feasible, provided the accuracy of the estimate is considered alongside the therapeutic index
of the pharmaceutical.
Keywords Goat · Bodyweight · Anthelmintic · Sustainable development
Introduction
Small ruminant production has been identified as a potentially sustainable, climate-resilient route towards improving livelihoods in many resources-limited settings (Sargison
M.J. Evans and C.L. Kaona are joint first authors.
* M. J. Evans
1
Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University
of Edinburgh, Roslin, UK
2
Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources,
Lilongwe, Malawi
3
Worldwide Veterinary Services, Cranborne, UK
4
Universidade Federal Do Maranhão, São Luís, Brazil
5
Department of Animal Health and Livestock Development,
Lilongwe, Malawi
et al. 2020). Malawi is one such example, remaining one
of the world’s economically poorest nations, with approximately 50% of the population living in poverty despite recent
economic growth (World Bank 2020). Approximately 80%
of the population of Malawi are employed in agriculture, and
this sector has been identified as particularly vulnerable to
climatic shocks (World Bank 2020; Ignaciuk et al. 2021).
Small ruminants (principally goats) are the most numerous
mammalian livestock species in Malawi (Food and Agriculture Organization 2005). Whilst there is little research quantifying the economic impact of endemic livestock diseases
in lower- and middle-income countries (LMICs) (Perry and
Grace 2009), haemonchosis is a well-recognised problem
across sub-Saharan Africa (Emery et al. 2016); therefore,
sustainable control of this gastrointestinal nematode (GIN)
infection is vital, if small ruminant production is to function
as a route towards poverty alleviation (Bessell et al. 2018).
13
Vol.:(0123456789)
72
Page 2 of 8
Sargison et al. (2021) demonstrated that FAMACHA
scoring and faecal egg counting can be an effective way to
engage Malawian smallholders with the concept of animal
health management; however, that study also identified a
potential lack of efficacy with albendazole treatments. In
order to improve animal health and production, and to maintain farmer engagement, it is essential that the efficacy of
advocated treatments is maximised. At the same time, for
interventions to be sustainable longer term, it is key that
the development and spread of anthelmintic resistance are
minimised. This is particularly important given that benzimidazoles and ivermectin are the only anthelmintics commonly available in Malawi (author observation). Utilising a
limited range of anthelmintic classes may increase selection
for anthelmintic resistance, as well as reducing mitigation
strategies once resistance establishes. There are very few
studies investigating the presence and scale of anthelmintic resistance in LMICs and efficacy may currently be high
(Seyoum et al. 2017); however, genetic analysis of Haemonchus spp. in Pakistan revealed evidence of multiple rapid
emergences of benzimidazole resistance (Ali et al. 2019)
similar to the progression previously observed in intensive
production systems situated in high-income countries (Kotze
et al. 2020). Affordable strategies aimed at reducing other
selective pressures for anthelmintic resistance may therefore
be very valuable in resource-limited settings.
One such strategy is to avoid the administration of subtherapeutic doses of anthelmintics (Smith et al. 1999). However,
it is unusual for Malawian farmers to have access to weigh
scales; therefore, it is necessary to develop proxy measurements that can be used to estimate goats’ bodyweight accurately. The relationships between goat bodyweight and morphometrics (particularly thoracic girth at the level of the heart)
have been extensively studied with 42 worldwide examples
found during a literature search for this study (Supplementary
Tab.S1). However, there have been no studies utilising goats
in Malawi, and Chinchilla-Vargas et al. (2018) demonstrated
variation in the relationship between chest girth and bodyweight between local breed goats in neighbouring east African
countries. Furthermore, the majority of studies have focussed
on defining the relationships as a selective index; only four
studies discuss the variation around the line of best fit (Mayaka et al. 1996; Mahieu et al. 2011; Eyduran et al. 2017; Hopker et al. 2019); and only one of these discusses the impact
that this variation would have on dose rates if the relationship
was used to inform dose calculations (Hopker et al. 2019).
Machila et al. (2008) investigated the impact of weight estimation on dose rates in Zebu cattle; however, they optimised
their weigh tape to estimate ± 20% of true bodyweight, as they
were considering medicines with narrow therapeutic indices.
In contrast, ivermectin and benzimidazoles have much wider
therapeutic indices (Abdou and Sharkawy 2004; Foreyt 1988;
Mohsen et (...truncated)