Interventions for myopia control in children: a living systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Cochrane Library Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Interventions for myopia control in children: a living systematic review and network meta-analysis (Review) Lawrenson JG, Shah R, Huntjens B, Downie LE, Virgili G, Dhakal R, Verkicharla PK, Li D, Mavi S, Kernohan A, Li T, Walline JJ Lawrenson JG, Shah R, Huntjens B, Downie LE, Virgili G, Dhakal R, Verkicharla PK, Li D, Mavi S, Kernohan A, Li T, Walline JJ. Interventions for myopia control in children: a living systematic review and network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2023, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD014758. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD014758.pub2. www.cochranelibrary.com Interventions for myopia control in children: a living systematic review and network meta-analysis (Review) Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. on behalf of The Cochrane Collaboration. Cochrane Library Trusted evidence. Informed decisions. Better health. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT..................................................................................................................................................................................................... PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY....................................................................................................................................................................... SUMMARY OF FINDINGS.............................................................................................................................................................................. BACKGROUND.............................................................................................................................................................................................. OBJECTIVES.................................................................................................................................................................................................. METHODS..................................................................................................................................................................................................... RESULTS........................................................................................................................................................................................................ Figure 1.................................................................................................................................................................................................. Figure 2.................................................................................................................................................................................................. Figure 3.................................................................................................................................................................................................. DISCUSSION.................................................................................................................................................................................................. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS........................................................................................................................................................................... ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS................................................................................................................................................................................ REFERENCES................................................................................................................................................................................................ CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDIES.................................................................................................................................................................. RISK OF BIAS................................................................................................................................................................................................ DATA AND ANALYSES.................................................................................................................................................................................... Analysis 1.1. Comparison 1: Undercorrection vs full correction spectacles, Outcome 1: Change in refractive error from baseline... Analysis 1.2. Comparison 1: Undercorrection vs full correction spectacles, Outcome 2: Change in axial length from baseline...... Analysis 2.1. Comparison 2: Multifocal spectacle lenses vs single vision spectacle lenses, Outcome 1: Change in refractive error from baseline......................................................................................................................................................................................... Analysis 2.2. Comparison 2: Multifocal spectacle lenses vs single vision spectacle lenses, Outcome 2: Change in axial length from baseline ....................................................................................................................................................................................... Analysis 2.3. Comparison 2: Multifocal spectacle lenses vs single vision spectacle lenses, Outcome 3: Change in refractive error following cessation of treatment (1 year)........................................................................................................................................... Analysis 3.1. Comparison 3: Peripheral plus spectacles vs single vision spectacle lenses, Outcome 1: Change in refractive error from baseline ....................................................................................................................................................................................... Analysis 3.2. Comparison 3: Peripheral plus spectacles vs single vision spectacle lenses, Outcome 2: Change in axial length from baseline.................................................................................................................................................................................................. Analysis 4.1. Comparison 4: Multifocal soft contact lenses vs single vision soft contact lenses, Outcome 1: Change in refractive error from baseline............................................................................................................................................................................... Analysis 4.2. Comparison 4: Multifocal soft contact lenses vs single vision soft contact lenses, Outcome 2: Change in axial length from baseline......................................................................................................................................................................................... Analysis 4.3. Compa (...truncated)