Microstructure evolution accounting for crystal plasticity in the context of the multiphase-field method
Computational Mechanics
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-023-02423-7
ORIGINAL PAPER
Microstructure evolution accounting for crystal plasticity in the
context of the multiphase-field method
Thea Kannenberg1,2
· Lukas Schöller1,2 · Andreas Prahs1 · Daniel Schneider2,3 · Britta Nestler1,2,3
Received: 29 August 2023 / Accepted: 13 November 2023
© The Author(s) 2023
Abstract
The role of grain boundaries (GBs) and especially the migration of GBs is of utmost importance in regard of the overall
mechanical behavior of polycrystals. By implementing a crystal plasticity (CP) theory in a multiphase-field method, where
GBs are considered as diffuse interfaces of finite thickness, numerically costly tracking of migrating GBs, present during phase
transformation processes, can be avoided. In this work, the implementation of the constitutive material behavior within the
diffuse interface region, considers phase-specific plastic fields and the jump condition approach accounting for CP. Moreover,
a coupling is considered in which the phase-field evolution and the balance of linear momentum are solved in each time
step. The application of the model is extended to evolving phases and moving interfaces and approaches to strain inheritance
are proposed. The impact of driving forces on the phase-field evolution arising from plastic deformation is discussed. To
this end, the shape evolution of an inclusion is investigated. The resulting equilibrium shapes depend on the anisotropic
plastic deformation and are illustrated and examined. Subsequently, evolving phases are studied in the context of static
recrystallization (SRX). The GB migration involved in the growth of nuclei, which are placed in a previously deformed grain
structure, is investigated. For this purpose, three approaches to strain inheritance are compared and, subsequently, different
grain structures and distributions of nuclei are considered. It is shown, how the revisited method contributes to a simulation
of SRX.
Keywords Crystal plasticity theory · Multiphase-field method · Grain boundary migration · Strain inheritance
B Thea Kannenberg
Lukas Schöller
Andreas Prahs
Daniel Schneider
Britta Nestler
1
Institute for Applied Materials - Microstructure Modelling
and Simulation (IAM-MMS), Karlsruhe Institute of
Technology (KIT), Straße am Forum 7, 76131 Karlsruhe,
Germany
2
Institute of Digital Materials Science (IDM), Karlsruhe
University of Applied Sciences, Moltkestraße 30, 76133
Karlsruhe, Germany
3
Institute of Nanotechnology - Microstructure Simulations
(INT-MSS), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT),
Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1, 76344
Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany
1 Introduction
Motivation
The investigation of microstructural mechanisms in materials science and associated phenomena is fundamental for
developing and improving materials regarding their effective
properties such as strength and ductility. Furthermore, the
prediction of the material behavior under certain conditions is
essential for various applications. Microstructural evolution
involves a large diversity of often complex processes. In order
to manipulate microstructural evolution and thereby tailor
the effective material properties, a thorough understanding
of the phenomena occurring on a microscopic scale is essential. Modeling and simulation of material behavior, help to
gain insights into microstructural transformation processes.
In contrast to experiments, specific phenomena can be modeled and investigated, separately. Regarding the simulation
123
Computational Mechanics
of microstructure evolution during recrystallization the modeling of migrating grain boundaries (GBs) is required. In this
context, plastic deformation energy provides a driving force
on GBs, amongst other sources of energy, cf., e.g., [1]. The
plastic behavior of polycrystalline materials can be directly
related to the evolution of lattice defects such as dislocations and experimental investigations are commonly based on
the exploitation of dislocation density measurements. In the
present work, the plastic deformation is considered in terms
of classical crystal plasticity (CP) theory, cf., e.g., [2]. In this
context, the plastic deformation is described by so-called
plastic slips acting on specific slip systems characteristic
for each crystal symmetry. Thus, the CP constitutes a phenomenological model that takes into account the underlying
microstructure such as the characteristic slip systems. Based
on Orowan’s law, cf., e.g., [3, Eq. (6.31b)], the plastic slips
can be related to the dislocation densities in an approximative sense and the considered model is applied to describe
the microstructural evolution during load as well as morphological changes of the microstructure after loading.
Multiphase-field method
The tracking of GBs in the sharp interface context is
numerically challenging and costly. It can be circumvented
by the use of a multiphase-field method (MPFM). Instead
of modeling GBs as material singular surfaces, cf., e.g., [4],
as commonly done in classical continuum mechanics, GBs
are modeled as diffuse interfaces within the MPFM, cf.,
e.g., [5–9]. The position of interfaces is implicitly given
by the contour of the field of order parameters, thus, no
explicit tracking is needed, cf., e.g., Chen [9]. The MPFM
is widely established for simulating microstructural evolution. Applications include solidification [10, 11], solid-solid
phase transformations, cf., e.g., [12, 13], and more recently
crack propagation [14–16]. In the work at hand, the MPFM
is based on the work by Steinbach et al. [17], Steinbach and
Pezzolla [18] and Nestler et al. [19].
Crystal plasticity in the context of the multiphase-field
method
To implement CP in an MPFM, an approach is required
to account for the mechanical fields in the diffuse interface.
In literature, three approaches are discussed: the interpolation approach, the homogenization approach, cf., e.g., [20,
21], and, more recently, the jump condition approach, cf.,
e.g., [22–25]. Regarding the interpolation approach, all
material points follow the same set of mechanical constitutive equations. The material parameters, however, may
differ and are interpolated within the diffuse interface, cf.,
e.g., [20]. More possibilities are offered by homogenization approaches, where different constitutive equations may
apply in different phases. The behavior of the diffuse interface is significantly influenced by the chosen homogenization
scheme, cf., e.g., [20]. The inheritance of plastic strains
123
during phase transitions is an important topic of an ongoing discussion. Within interpolation and homogenization
approaches the transformation behavior is significantly different, as discussed, e.g., by Ammar et al. [26]. The jump
condition approach can be seen as an addition to the homogenization approach. Schneider et al. [24] introduced a method
for the calculation of stresses in a multiphase system, which
satisfies the mechan (...truncated)