Proton NMR study of the [d(ACGTATACGT)]2-2echinomycin complex: conformational changes between echinomycin binding sites
Nucleic Acids Research, Vol. 20, No. 10
2411-2420
Proton NMR study of the [d(ACGTATACGT)]2-2echinomycin
complex: conformational changes between echinomycin
binding sites
Dara E.Gilbert+ and Juli Feigon*
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry and the Molecular Biology Institute, University of California
at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA
Received April 18, 1992; Accepted April 21, 1992
The interactions of echinomycin and the DNA decamer
[d(ACGTATACGT)]2 were studied by proton NMR.
Echinomycin binds cooperatively as a bisintercalator
at the CpG steps. The terminal A-T base pairs are
Hoogsteen base paired, but none of the four central
A-T base pairs are Hoogsteen base paired. However,
binding of the drug induces unwinding of the DNA
which is propagated to the central ApT step. All four
central A • T base pairs are destabilized relative to those
in the free DNA. Furthermore, based on these and other
results from our laboratory, we conclude that the
formation of stable Hoogsteen base pairs may not be
the relevant structural change in vivo. The structural
changes propagated between adjacent ACGT binding
sites are the unwinding of the duplex and
destabilization of the base pairing between binding
sites.
INTRODUCTION
Echinomycin is a naturally occurring antibiotic comprised of an
octadepsipeptide ring with a thioacetal cross bridge between
opposing cysteines and quinoxaline rings attached via peptide
linkages to the two D-serine residues (Chart I). It exhibits potent
anti-viral and anti-tumor activity (1). Echinomycin is currently
in phase two clinical trials as a chemotherapeutic agent (2).
Footprinting experiments established the preference for binding
of echinomycin at CpG steps (3,4) and showed that echinomycin
binding altered the structure of the DNA adjacent to the
echinomycin binding sites, rendering it more reactive with DNase
I and other DNA cleavage reagents (3, 5). This hyperreactivity
to cleavage reagents is also observed several base pairs away
from the nearest binding site. Mendel and Dervan (5) and Fox
and Kentebe (6) showed that binding of echinomycin to DNA
causes hyperreactivity to DNase I or DEPC up to 12 base pairs
from the nearest binding site. The structural basis for the
enhanced reactivity of DNA distal to the binding sites is not well
understood. McClean and co-workers showed that DNA
fragments in which the adenines were modified at the N7 position
such that they could not Hoogsteen base pair remained
hypersensitive to cleavage by OsO4 (7). Based on these results,
they proposed that this structural change was the unwinding of
the DNA duplex induced by the intercalative binding of
echinomycin rather than the formation of Hoogsteen base pairs
(7).
None of the structural studies to date have addressed the issue
of what structural changes are propagated between binding sites
several base pairs apart. No structural information, either in
solution or the crystalline state, has been obtained for DNAechinomycin complexes in which two CpG binding sites are
separated by more than two A • T base pairs. In order to address
questions regarding the structure of the DNA between two
echinomycin binding sites, the complex formed between
echinomycin and [d(ACGTATACGT)]2, in which the CpG
binding sites are separated by four base pairs, was studied by
'H NMR. The goals of this study were to determine: (1) if
Hoogsteen base pairs form; (2) if so, are Hoogsteen base pairs
propagated one base pair away from the binding site; and (3)
if not, what other structural changes occur that account for the
observed hyperreactivity to DNA cleavage reagents of DNA distal
to the binding site.
Many of the results obtained in this study are consistent with
those obtained on the [d(ACGTACGT)]2-2echinomycin
* To whom correspondence should be addressed
+
Present address: Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, NL-3584 CH, Utrecht, The Netherlands
ABSTRACT
2412 Nucleic Acids Research, Vol. 20, No. 10
complex. Two drugs bind cooperatively per duplex, one at each
of the CpG steps. The terminal A T base pairs are Hoogsteen
base paired. All four central A T base pairs are destabilized
relative to the free DNA. However, in contrast to the results
obtained for the [d(ACGTACGT)]2-2echinomycin complex,
there is no direct evidence for the formation of Hoogsteen base
pairs between the binding sites at any temperature. There is
evidence that the helix is unwound through the four central A • T
base pairs. Two structural changes, destabilization of base pairing
and unwinding of the duplex, are propagated through all four
A-T base pairs between the two echinomycin intercalation sites.
NMR Spectroscopy
All NMR experiments were done on a General Electric GN500
(500.119 MHz, 'H) spectrometer (GE NMR, Fremont, CA).
Chemical shifts were referenced to the chemical shift of water,
which had been previously calibrated relative to
2,2-dimethyl-2-silapentane-5-sulfonate (DSS). Phase sensitive
nuclear Overhauser effect (NOESY) spectra in D2O were
obtained using the method of States et al. (15) and the standard
RESULTS
Complex Formation
Figure 1 shows the aromatic region of the spectrum of
[d(ACGTATACGT)]2-echinomycin as a function of increasing
drug:DNA ratio. Upon addition of 0.5 equivalents of drug, a
second set of resonances appears. As the drug:DNA ratio is
raised, the intensity of the second set of lines increases and the
resonances from the free DNA decrease in intensity until, at a
drug:DNA ratio of 2:1, only the resonances from the fully
saturated complex are observed. The appearance of two sets of
resonances indicates that the free and drug complexed DNA are
>DRUG
1-2
I 5
Figure 1. Proton NMR spectra of the aromatic region of [d(ACGTATACGT)]2-echinomycin as a function of added drug concentration at 30°C in D2O.
DNA:echinomycin ratios of (A) 1:0, (B) 1:0.5, (C)l:l, and (D) 1:2 are shown.
Solid lines connect the free DNA resonances to the free DNA resonances in the
spectra of the 1:0 and 1:0.5 complexes; dashed lines connect the resonances of
the fully saturated complex with the resonances of the fully saturated complex
in the spectrum of the 1:1 complex. 0.5 equivalents of echinomycin in methanol
were added to the DNA (1.9 mM duplex, 104 mM NaCl, pH 6.6) in the NMR
tube. After each addition, the sample was dried under a stream of N2 gas and
redissolved in 99.996% D2O. The spectra were acquired with a sweep width
of 5000 Hz in 8K complex points. Data were Gaussian broadened by 3Hz prior
to Fourier transformation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Sample Preparation
The DNA decamer d(A|C2G3T 4 A 5 T 6 A 7 C 8 G 9 T 10 ) was
synthesized on the 10 /oriole scale on an Applied Biosystems
381A DNA synthesizer using phosphoramidite chemistry. The
decamer was purified by gel filtration as previously described
(13). Two DNA samples were prepared by dissolving the DNA
in 50 mM NaCl and adjusting the pH to 6.5 (uncorrected meter
reading) with 0.1 M NaOH. No additional (...truncated)